F*ck the Undertaker.

Momentum

Banned
Supporter
Joined
Nov 27, 2012
Messages
25,830
Reputation
856
Daps
60,084
Reppin
NULL
He looked like he could barely walk out the ring after that half choke slam :hhh:
Roman sold it well and gave him a good jump, but the question is can they wrestle a regular Roman type of match for longer than a few minutes?

If they try all that punching shyt Taker did with Shane they are getting booed out the building.
 

stro

Superstar
Joined
May 18, 2015
Messages
10,027
Reputation
1,185
Daps
29,235
Reppin
Indiana
I agree with fukk Taker. Just because he's retiring means we're supposed to forget that he was in damn near all of the worst angles and matches of the 90s, consistently had bad/boring matches with Hart/Austin/Rock, was the laziest piece of shyt possible in 2000, was the most unprofessional piece of shyt who went out of his way to make every Alliance dude look like utter dog shyt (Summerslam 2001 is about as unprofessional of a burial as you can get), had a great year and a half, then went back to the Deadman shyt and ended up being in in a lot of the worst angles of the 2000s as well.

Dude hadn't worked a full time schedule in like 15 years because even if he wasn't hurt he'd take 4-6 months off a year and come back to the top spot regardless of the angles or pushes going on at the time. The only guy he ever truly put over was Brock. To have one guy elevated in a nearly 30 year career is pretty pathetic. Especially for such a "legendary" performer.

We're also all acting like he should have tapped out 7 years ago and went out on the biggest stage embarrassing himself in front of 70K people. Good riddance. These mother fukkers trying to do the HBK/Flair shyt. GTFO. :camby:
 

Silkk

Thats My Quarterback :to:
Joined
May 2, 2012
Messages
193,513
Reputation
19,694
Daps
488,600
I agree with fukk Taker. Just because he's retiring means we're supposed to forget that he was in damn near all of the worst angles and matches of the 90s, consistently had bad/boring matches with Hart/Austin/Rock, was the laziest piece of shyt possible in 2000, was the most unprofessional piece of shyt who went out of his way to make every Alliance dude look like utter dog shyt (Summerslam 2001 is about as unprofessional of a burial as you can get), had a great year and a half, then went back to the Deadman shyt and ended up being in in a lot of the worst angles of the 2000s as well.

Dude hadn't worked a full time schedule in like 15 years because even if he wasn't hurt he'd take 4-6 months off a year and come back to the top spot regardless of the angles or pushes going on at the time. The only guy he ever truly put over was Brock. To have one guy elevated in a nearly 30 year career is pretty pathetic. Especially for such a "legendary" performer.

We're also all acting like he should have tapped out 7 years ago and went out on the biggest stage embarrassing himself in front of 70K people. Good riddance. These mother fukkers trying to do the HBK/Flair shyt. GTFO. :camby:
Man fukk You. You're the same fool who says that Jay Lethal can't wrestle and that Shawn Michaels only had four good matches from 96-98.
 

stro

Superstar
Joined
May 18, 2015
Messages
10,027
Reputation
1,185
Daps
29,235
Reppin
Indiana
Okay, keep pretending those Taker vs Yoko/Mabel/Giant Gonzalez matches were classics and deserving of legendary status. Keep pretending that anyone but Brock and Foley (through his bump, not from Taker) came out better after a feud with Taker.
 

Eddie Brock

All Star
Joined
Aug 24, 2015
Messages
2,218
Reputation
335
Daps
5,666
Just came hear to let y'all know y'all sound stupid as hell right now with this fukk Taker nonsense.
 

Kidd Dibiase

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
Nov 23, 2013
Messages
71,390
Reputation
9,357
Daps
196,212
Okay, keep pretending those Taker vs Yoko/Mabel/Giant Gonzalez matches were classics and deserving of legendary status. Keep pretending that anyone but Brock and Foley (through his bump, not from Taker) came out better after a feud with Taker.
So every single feud needs to be classic and legendary? A lot of people would be thrown out of this legendary category if this is the case
 

stro

Superstar
Joined
May 18, 2015
Messages
10,027
Reputation
1,185
Daps
29,235
Reppin
Indiana
So every single feud needs to be classic and legendary? A lot of people would be thrown out of this legendary category if this is the case

When the vast majority of your feuds were shyt, and you're the only person in all of those feuds....

Having one good-great match a year doesn't make someone legendary. And if we're being honest, at least half the streak matches sucked, too.
 
Top