Listen clown i'm not getting into a back and forth with you because tha'ts the negative bullshyt you thrive in. I could give a flying fukk on your opinion of me. What you've been exposed for is being an unapologetic homo democratic shill here to cofunse and deflect the attention of the forum.
I know you're not because what could you possibly say? You couldn't possibly deny the veracity of what I said. It's already established that you have a serious credibility problem because of your lengthy history of contradictory, nonsensical statements (i.e. simultaneously stanning Ron Paul and Fidel Castro and calling anyone who doesn't support both men "c00ns" and "idiots" to name just one example).
The problem is you're always getting mad and trying to get at other people when you have not a leg to stand on. You have NO credibility to insult ANYBODY'S views on anything involving politics in the ad hominem manner you do, period. Unless maybe you offer a mea culpa for your lengthy history of idiotic, contradicting statements and vow that you're going to try and be a better and more learned poster.
WHAT THE fukk DOES IS THIS THREAD trying to accomplish? To redicule a retired politician? To ridicule other posters and create more forum drama and division?
Uh, it's a news article about a (once) prominent politician on a forum called Higher Learning, of which politics is the most popular topic?
Guess what, i don't GIVE A fukk who Ron Paul is speaking to right now as he is not even in government right now. If your some how trying to imply that Ron is a racist, I would likely agree with you because MOST white people are. Your not breaking any new ground buddy.
So why bother responding with that much venom? Are you ashamed of your years of shellacking his scrotum?
Meanwhile, as you focus on this trivial bullshyt your boy OBAMA is right now trying to start WW3! And like a good little democrat you simply ignore that issue and instead the only discussion you'd rather have is how i apparent suck as a poster, or what old retired senator Ron Paul is up too. Your an intellectual p*ssy and I'm not discussing shyt with you until you DEFEND the recent actions of your HOUSE nikka PRESIDENT that you insisted every intelligent person should relect in 2012.
I'll be waiting.
lol@you switching the subject to Obama. I'll play along. I think it's hard for you understand the positions of someone like me when it comes to Obama, or any other politician. The reason being you dwell in a binary universe of only dikkriding and hating with no space in between.
Regarding Syria, I do not support the decision for military action there. But it's funny that you would ask me to defend Obama's actions. Why? Because I voted for him? If I vote for him I have to support and defend every decisions he makes? I don't support a lot of things Obama has done (or didn't do). That's kinda the way adults are. We try to assess things from a detached perspective, and balance all the nuances, contradictions, and moving parts of public policy and the politics that go along with it in our heads and form conclusions that usually don't fall into absolutist trappings.
What's weird is on the podcast, you seem to be able to see nuance and different perspectives, and speak in a reasonable, detached manner. At this point, I almost think that wasn't even really you on the podcast and you

us by putting on one of your friends and had him pretend it was you. That guy seems like an entirely different person who gets on the board and does nothing but type these autistic, tourette's-like "Obamabot fukk you liberals c00ns house negros Cornel West is God Democrat plantation MSNBC fakkit idiot big government homosexual agenda" diatribes of pure intellectual diarrhea.