EU, Congress, and Silicon Valley Caught Political/Ideological Fade, Now Censoring Alt/Indy Media

[Saiyajin]

infowars

 

[newworldafro]

infowars

Versus fake news that makes up Russian thots peeing on people or making up Russian hack of Vermont electricity grid, which the company said was some random malware on an unconnected laptop.

Or a joker on a green screeen boat on CNN....I like how yall ignore the shiit that slaps down your angle...I literally have a video of a CNN reporter a few posts up, on a "green screen boat following a ship in Europe" ^^^^^^. I've shown this video on multiple threads and jokers never respond, they act like they ain't see it.......but they'll continue spouting alt/indy media is the "fake news". If they'll fake a man on a boat for views or to get a POV across, what else will they do to get a "story" out.

So in case you missed it, here is upstanding CNN..not Infowars..with a "man on a boat"



Matterfact...lets keep it 100. CNN been "faking news" for 20+ years.

 

[Saiyajin]

Versus fake news that makes up Russian thots peeing on people or making up Russian hack of Vermont electricity grid.

Or a joker on a green screeen boat onCNN....I like how yall ignore the shiit that slaps down your angle...I literally have a video of a CNN reporter a few posts up, on a green screen post "following a ship in Europe" ^^^^^^. I've shown this video on multiple threads and jokers never respond, they act like they ain't see it.......but they'll continue spouting alt/indy media is the "fake news".

much better than



"hillary clinton and obama are literal demons"

or this riveting coverage

 

[ExodusNirvana]

much better than



"hillary clinton and obama are literal demons"

or this riveting coverage

Didn't Alex Jones say that the powers that be had already fixed it so that Hillary was going to be President? Did he mean 2020?

 

[newworldafro]

much better than



"hillary clinton and obama are literal demons"

or this riveting coverage

As usual...jokers leap frog away from the point at hand....CNN reporter on a green screen boat...you can't handle the truth...wake up..

If he wasn't influential then why would Hillary feel the need to talk about him? If he wasn't influential then why do the multitude of heavy hitting guests who have worked in different sectors come on his show. He's independent and his own producer and not reading off a teleprompter, so he doesn't have to behave like a drone.

When you are I.N.D.E.P.E.ND.E.N.T. you can show your quirks and your true unfiltered personality.....See Boyce Watkins; See Tariq Nasheed...are they acting? Are they not providing the truth as they see it?

The pickle gate exposed the small lies they'll do. If they'll fabricate something so miniscule, then what won't they lie about.......like a man on a green screen boat.

Bring up insignificant points, when the thread topic is about censoring of the 1st Amendment on the internet

 

[Saiyajin]

As usual...jokers leap frog away from the point at hand....CNN reporter on a green screen boat...you can't handle the truth...wake up..

If he wasn't influential then why would Hillary feel the need to talk about him? If he wasn't influential then why do the multitude of heavy hitting guests who have worked in different sectors come on his show. He's independent and his own producer and not reading off a teleprompter, so he doesn't have to behave like a drone.

When you are I.N.D.E.P.E.ND.E.N.T. you can show your quirks and your true unfiltered personality.....See Boyce Watkins; See Tariq Nasheed...are they acting? Are they not providing the truth as they see it?

The pickle gate exposed the small lies they'll do. If they'll fabricate something so miniscule, then what won't they lie about.......like a man on a green screen boat.

Bring up insignificant points, when the thread topic is about censoring of the 1st Amendment on the internet

 

[newworldafro]

@ADevilYouKhow negged me on the post with the CNN green screen man on a boat, but no explanation. Elaborate.

The thread is about censorship of the 1st Amendment on the internet which we all, theoretically, should have issue with.

 

[Pull Up the Roots]

What censorship of the 1st Amendment? That's not happening at all. Pushback against propaganda is not censorship. Stop fukking reading Zero Hedge.

US:
Overview

Despite substantial upheaval in the traditional media sector, the United States retains a diverse press landscape and some of the strongest legal protections in the world for freedom of expression. The most serious threats to press freedom stem from an increasingly challenging economic environment. The media have also faced problems related to the tension between the principle of openness on the one hand and the national security priorities of the government on the other. During 2015, however, there were fewer controversies than in previous years over government surveillance of journalists or attempts to compel reporters to reveal the sources of leaked information.

The United States has one of the world’s strongest systems of legal protection for media independence. The First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution provides the core guarantee of press freedom and freedom of speech. While those rights have come under pressure at various times in the country’s history, the independent court system has repeatedly issued rulings that uphold and expand the right of journalists to be free of state control. The courts have also given the press broad protection from libel and defamation suits that involve commentary on public figures, though libel formally remains a criminal offense in a number of states.

The real problem is we lack federal shield laws protecting journalist sources.

I also saw you in another thread recommending Rense and Whatreallyhappened, and I have to ask how in the hell do you consider them legitimate sources? They post some of the most outrageous conspiracies and they regularly promote David Duke.

 

[Leasy]

They speeding up that new world order process brehs

 

[Trece]

Yeah I don't care what the future repercussions are I want to put a lid on this white supremacy surge immediately.

I think this forum would actually give a shyt about this if someone like Obama told them he was outraged at this 1984 censorship bullshyt.. in other words we are waiting for a nod from our DNC massas.

 

[Trece]

infowars

All these cats Jordan memeing infowars were just proudly sporting Buzzfeed which had a fake story being dapped up about Russian prostitutes. This shouldnt be a partisan discussion Brehs. If fake news gets gobbled up and alt right blogs like Breitbart and Truth Revolt go away then so does Vox and Slate..
Basically you all are asking for censorship of 1 particular point of view only. America isnt supposed to work like that brehs. You kill white nationalists with ridicule and facts not censorship.. If anything censorship will just make these ideas more popular-people want what they cant have. This whole liberal ministry of truth idea could backfire.

 

[newworldafro]

What censorship of the 1st Amendment? That's not happening at all. Pushback against propaganda is not censorship. Stop fukking reading Zero Hedge.

The real problem is we lack federal shield laws protecting journalist sources.

I also saw you in another thread recommending Rense and Whatreallyhappened, and I have to ask how in the hell do you consider them legitimate sources? They post some of the most outrageous conspiracies and they regularly promote David Duke.

This is why I listen to alt/indy media because you are coming from the sheeplized MSM plantation POV, and you don't even know it. You think you are informed, because you listen to MSM, but they never connect the dots for you. l ain't tripping on you personally breh, cause it's all around.

Let me connect a dot for you breh. Here are the sources, but the ones you just discredited were talking about this as well. The irony of Buzzfeed back then and now:
1) http://www.businessinsider.com/ndaa-legalizes-propaganda-2012-5
2)Congressmen Seek To Lift Propaganda Ban

In December 2012, Congress and BHO passed the 2013 NDAA, which included an addendum that allowed U.S. citizens to get propagandized by our own government:

"An amendment that would legalize the use of propaganda on American audiences is being inserted into the latest defense authorization bill, BuzzFeed has learned.

The amendment would “strike the current ban on domestic dissemination” of propaganda material produced by the State Department and the independent Broadcasting Board of Governors, according to the summary of the law at the House Rules Committee's official website.

The tweak to the bill would essentially neutralize two previous acts—the Smith-Mundt Act of 1948 and Foreign Relations Authorization Act in 1987—that had been passed to protect U.S. audiences from our own government’s misinformation campaigns."

Let the bolded, sink in for a second.
.
.
.
.
.

Ok, now think about what you just wrote above, about "pushback against propaganda is not censorship".
..
.
.
.
Are you seeing the chess move breh?? Do you get it? As of 2012, thanks to fukkbois in Congress and BHO, they undid over 65 years of laws that prevented domestically targeted propaganda fukkery, "Smith-Mundt Act of 1948 and Foreign Relations Authorization Act in 1987—that had been passed to protect U.S. audiences from our own government’s misinformation campaigns."

So now a 2017 NDAA law is passed that censors media sites. So in theory.....not only will we be recieving misinformation (2013 NDAA) but they will censor alt/indy (2017 NDAA) on top of that.

Misinform - Censor Alt/Indy = Misinformation
.
.
.
.

I've said it many many times the truth doesn't always come from sources that you are going to agree with 100% of the time. I think we should be at the point where "conspiracy" no longer has this stigma. Saying something is "conspiracy site" does not have the stigma anymore.....since wikileaks just uncovered for 8 months so much of those actual "conspiracies" being discussed and acted out.

So what news organizations do you think will not be censored or flagged

 

[newworldafro]

All these cats Jordan memeing infowars were just proudly sporting Buzzfeed which had a fake story being dapped up about Russian prostitutes. This shouldnt be a partisan discussion Brehs. If fake news gets gobbled up and alt right blogs like Breitbart and Truth Revolt go away then so does Vox and Slate..
Basically you all are asking for censorship of 1 particular point of view only. America isnt supposed to work like that brehs. You kill white nationalists with ridicule and facts not censorship.. If anything censorship will just make these ideas more popular-people want what they cant have. This whole liberal ministry of truth idea could backfire.

Every thing stated is 100% spot on!

 

[Pull Up the Roots]

words

I'm not reading your bullshyt. Your brain has been poisoned by your indulging in Zero Hedge/infowars for too long. And I don't blindly follow the MSM. This is a strawman you like to build whenever someone tries to point out your following of disreputable sources - sources that happen to be hyper-partisan conservative. You fukk up by assuming that independent or alternative = truthful, and mainstream = wrong/misleading, instead of adopting a questioning attitude towards all sources of information.

 

[newworldafro]

I'm not reading your bullshyt. Your brain has been poisoned by your indulging Zero Hedge/infowars for too long. And I don't blindly follow the MSM. This is a strawman you like to build whenever someone tries to point out your following of disreputable sources - sources that happen to be hyper-partisan conservative. You fukk up by assuming that independent or alternative = truthful, and mainstream = wrong/misleading.

Obviously you read it.

If you didn't then you still wrong, cause I explained how what happened in the 2013 NDAA and 2017 NDAA are connected.