Eric Holder: Drone Strike To Kill U.S. Citizen On American Soil Legal, Hypothetically

Type Username Here

Not a new member
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
16,368
Reputation
2,385
Daps
32,641
Reppin
humans
WASHINGTON -- The Obama administration believes it could technically use military force to kill an American on U.S. soil in an "extraordinary circumstance" but has "no intention of doing so," U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder said in a letter disclosed Tuesday.

Holder's March 4 letter was disclosed by Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.), who had asked whether the Justice Department believed President Barack Obama had the legal authority to order a targeted strike against an American citizen located within the United States.

The Obama administration, Holder said, rejected the use of military force where "well-established law enforcement authorities in this country provide the best means for incapacitating a terrorist threat." But in theory, it'd be legal for the president to order such an attack under certain circumstances, Holder said.

"The question you have posed is therefore entirely hypothetical, unlikely to occur, and one we hope no president will ever have to confront. It is possible, I suppose, to imagine an extraordinary circumstance in which it would be necessary and appropriate under the Constitution and applicable laws of the United States for the President to authorize the military to use lethal force within the territory of the United States," Holder wrote.

"For example, the president could conceivably have no choice but to authorize the military to use such force if necessary to protect the homeland in the circumstances like a catastrophic attack like the ones suffered on December 7, 1941, and September 11, 2001," Holder continued, referring to the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor and the terrorist attacks on the World Trade Center and Pentagon. Holder said he would "examine the particular facts and circumstances" if such an emergency were to arise.

Paul, who had threatened to filibuster the nomination of John Brennan as CIA director over secrecy about the U.S. drone program, said in a statement that Holder's "refusal to rule out the possibility of drone strikes on American citizens and on American soil is more than frightening -- it is an affront the Constitutional due process rights of all Americans." Holder's letter was first reported by Adam Serwer of Mother Jones.

Holder is scheduled to appear before the Senate Judiciary Committee for a Justice Department oversight hearing on Wednesday morning. Earlier in the day, members of the Senate Intelligence Committee said the administration had agreed to allow members of the committee to see all of the Office of Legal Counsel memos relating to the targeted killing of American citizens.

Eric Holder: Drone Strike To Kill U.S. Citizen On American Soil Legal, Hypothetically
 

the mechanic

Greasy philosophy
Joined
Feb 8, 2013
Messages
1,472
Reputation
-20
Daps
1,916
History repeats itself...nothing is ever new

caesarcrossingrubicon.jpg
 

Melt_Man

The Power to MELT!
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
948
Reputation
20
Daps
864
Watch the MSM totally ignore this.

Why's due process so important anyway.
 

A.R.$

Superstar
Supporter
Joined
Jun 3, 2012
Messages
8,121
Reputation
630
Daps
20,854
Watch the MSM totally ignore this.

Why's due process so important anyway.

I seen it on briefly on CNN as a quick headline. It wasn't any real discussion on it. Even if they do discuss it they will move on quickly. When is the last time the MSN mention the NDAA?
 

Jello Biafra

A true friend stabs you in the front
Supporter
Joined
May 16, 2012
Messages
46,184
Reputation
4,913
Daps
120,878
Reppin
Behind You
It amazes me that Eric Holder makes me look back fondly on this a$$hole:
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Mr210

Banned
Joined
Jun 2, 2012
Messages
23,215
Reputation
-7,878
Daps
18,420
Reppin
NULL
if Bush did this he would be hanged but not Obama, i cant stand his groupies that are so hypocritical and defend everything this man does
 

bzb

Superstar
Supporter
Joined
Feb 15, 2013
Messages
3,910
Reputation
2,524
Daps
21,796
their examples (pearl harbor, 9/11) are terrible. unless they're saying us citizens had a hand in those attacks.

either way it's a moot point, they already played their hand when they sent the drones for dorner. it's also well established that the alphabet boys and us marshalls have no issue capturing and/or killing us citizens when convenient or needed. ruby ridge, waco, etc.
 
Top