Elon Musk and Tucker Carlson Cracking Jokes About….I Can’t Even Say It…WTF

[buzzkill]

literally every major company in the US takes billions in government subsidies.

Subsidy Tracker

Subsidy Tracker, produced by the Corporate Research Project of Good Jobs First, is a wide-ranging database on misconduct by large and small corporations throughout the United States.

subsidytracker.goodjobsfirst.org

You have no idea what you are talking about.

The US has never once functioned with a limited government. No country in the world does. Well maybe Sudan. The limited government bullshyt was something rich republicans sold to low IQ individuals so you would vote to give them more tax breaks.

You can’t even define capitalism you illiterate buffoon c00n.

Let me guess everything good is capitalism and everything bad is socialism?

You haven’t read Adam Smith or Karl Marx and we are supposed to listen to an uneducated simpleton Bama treatise on economic philosophy

The American government is spending more than it makes? I didn’t realize America had a 9-5. Are you referring to taxes collected?

Also literally the economy has grown and performed better under democrats for almost 40 years. What the fukk are you talking about?

Same with debt, increases drastically under republicans vs democrats

National debt growth by president U.S. 2023 | Statista

Adding to national debt is an inevitable fact of being President of the United States.

www.statista.com

What do you mean spending power? Weakens who’s spending power? For what? You’re just saying shyt you heard and don’t even know what it means


Go sit down somewhere you uncultured, untraveled, uneducated wannabe peckerwood.

Ok comrade. Excuse me I meant purchasing power. Happy with your gotcha moment? I have read the communist manifesto actually and a few other books about economics. Comm. Manifesto was stupid. Just philosophy on why u need to enslave people and suck that govt titty.

You went through all that research to justify govt spending more than it makes and why u need govt titty and want to enslave other people. I'm not for reckless spending no matter who is in office. The only thing the right gets right is cutting taxes. We should keep the money we earn. Your ideology is slavery.

Tell me what entity can be healthy over time spending more than it makes and making money appears out of thin air. You don't understand spending more than it makes? Are u dumb? Do you not understand a govt has a budget and we've been at a deficit & printing money since bush lmao. You claim we perform better but in 2024 you need a pres to print 25k so a person can buy overinflated homes. Yeah ok buddy the Dems have done great.

Clinton benefitted from dotcom but we actually had a balanced budget so props for that the Dems should go back to sanity not socialism. Obama printed and spent his ass off to get out of the recession. Trump and Biden have the money printer going crazy.

Wanting the govt to stop spending and have a budget is c00ning, cutting taxes and cutting spending is c00ning and having financial health is for whites . Needing govt to print money means you're well traveled and literate. Lmao trolling the left is funny as hell.

 

[buzzkill]

Don't use words when you don't know what they mean. Actual marxists don't agree with white liberals at all, those are two completely different groups.


This is what a socialist looks like:

Successful movements for Black liberation have been dominated by socialists.

2024 majority of socialist are pink haired white women, blue haired fakkits and nikkas who think like white women. Socialism communism and Marxism = we are all broke and all die of starvation.

 

[Mister Terrific]

Ok comrade. Excuse me I meant purchasing power.

What do you mean purchasing power? Purchasing power parity? What the hell are you talking about?

I have read the communist manifesto actually and a few other books about economics. Comm. Manifesto was stupid just like communism

A few books about economics Go on tell us why the communist manifesto was stupid. Specifically.

You went through all that research to justify govt spending more than it makes

Took me 3 seconds to find that information because I don’t go through life retarded like you.

What do you mean justify government spending more than it makes? Again what the fukk are you talking about? Tax revenue?

and why u need govt titty and want to enslave other people. I'm not for reckless spending no matter who is in office. The only thing the right gets right is cutting taxes.

Taxes are not enslavement. Taxes are for the public good so that shyt functions, buffoons like you have a job, we have clean water, public utilities, and cheap goods.

For instance let’s go back to the Boer fakkit you worship. Tesla doesn’t make money on its own, it needs billions in government subsidies because that government is banking on EV technology one day being a necessary facet of human life.

Same thing recently where the government has begun financing Semiconductor research. These companies don’t create value on their own and the government helps because it will create jobs and produce results at a latter date.

As for republicans cutting taxes being a net good. Boy you are in the sunken place

Tax Cuts Are Primarily Responsible for the Increasing Debt Ratio​

Without the Bush and Trump tax cuts, debt as a percentage of the economy would be declining permanently.

Tax Cuts Are Primarily Responsible for the Increasing Debt Ratio

Without the Bush and Trump tax cuts, debt as a percentage of the economy would be declining permanently.

www.americanprogress.org

This is of course common sense. But we can’t expect a Bama to have any.

We should keep the money we earn. Your ideology is slavery.

If you don’t like paying taxes you can move to Sudan or Somalia. I’m sure you can keep all of your income there.

Tell me what entity can be healthy over time spending more than it makes and making money appears out of thin air.

This entity

The financial position of the United States includes assets of at least $269 trillion (1576% of GDP) and debts of $145.8 trillion (852% of GDP) to produce a net worth of at least $123.8 trillion (723% of GDP).



You have no idea how debt functions. Every country in the world has debt as it’s a necessary function of monetary spending.

Most of US debt is own by US citizens and the other portion of debt is owned by other country’s because US debt is viewed as a guarantee of repayment.

For instance let’s compare you an Elon musk. A bank isn’t going to finance you because you’re a broke bama with limited financial literacy and financial fluidity.

Howver a bank is going to give Elon Musk a blank check of financing because they know they will more than likely recoup any losses should Elon Musk default on his debt as his wealth of assets and connections will float whatever bill he has.

Same with the US. Complaining about the US spending money for the public good and somehow running up a bill against itself is hilarious as US liquidity is essentially infinite.


Again you have no idea what you are taking about because you are an uneducated low IQ individual who is preyed on by smarter men for their advancement.

Wanting the govt to stop spending and have a budget is c00ning, cutting taxes and cutting spending is c00ning

Cutting taxes is what raises the deficit you dumbass buffoon c00n.

Increasing Deficit Can Be Traced to GOP Tax Cuts - Americans For Tax Fairness

Giveaways to Rich & Corporations Under Bush & Trump Have Caused Over Half Of Budget Shortfalls This Century Today’s monthly budget report again demonstrates that the federal deficit has been largely driven by tax cuts for the rich and corporations enacted by Republican politicians over the past...

americansfortaxfairness.org

Cutting spending doesn’t exist and has never existed.

The US doesn’t function how your home life functions Bama.

 

[buzzkill]

What do you mean purchasing power? Purchasing power parity? What the hell are you talking about?




A few books about economics Go on tell us why the communist manifesto was stupid. Specifically.



Took me 3 seconds to find that information because I don’t go through life retarded like you.

What do you mean justify government spending more than it makes? Again what the fukk are you talking about? Tax revenue?



Taxes are not enslavement. Taxes are for the public good so that shyt functions, buffoons like you have a job, we have clean water, public utilities, and cheap goods.

For instance let’s go back to the Boer fakkit you worship. Tesla doesn’t make money on its own, it needs billions in government subsidies because that government is banking on EV technology one day being a necessary facet of human life.

Same thing recently where the government has begun financing Semiconductor research. These companies don’t create value on their own and the government helps because it will create jobs and produce results at a latter date.

As for republicans cutting taxes being a net good. Boy you are in the sunken place

Tax Cuts Are Primarily Responsible for the Increasing Debt Ratio​

Without the Bush and Trump tax cuts, debt as a percentage of the economy would be declining permanently.

Tax Cuts Are Primarily Responsible for the Increasing Debt Ratio

Without the Bush and Trump tax cuts, debt as a percentage of the economy would be declining permanently.

www.americanprogress.org

This is of course common sense. But we can’t expect a Bama to have any.





If you don’t like paying taxes you can move to Sudan or Somalia. I’m sure you can keep all of your income there.



This entity

The financial position of the United States includes assets of at least $269 trillion (1576% of GDP) and debts of $145.8 trillion (852% of GDP) to produce a net worth of at least $123.8 trillion (723% of GDP).



You have no idea how debt functions. Every country in the world has debt as it’s a necessary function of monetary spending.

Most of US debt is own by US citizens and the other portion of debt is owned by other country’s because US debt is viewed as a guarantee of repayment.

For instance let’s compare you an Elon musk. A bank isn’t going to finance you because you’re a broke bama with limited financial literacy and financial fluidity.

Howver a bank is going to give Elon Musk a blank check of financing because they know they will more than likely recoup any losses should Elon Musk default on his debt as his wealth of assets and connections will float whatever bill he has.

Same with the US. Complaining about the US spending money for the public good and somehow running up a bill against itself is hilarious as US liquidity is essentially infinite.


Again you have no idea what you are taking about because you are an uneducated low IQ individual who is preyed on by smarter men for their advancement.




Cutting taxes is what raises the deficit you dumbass buffoon c00n.

Increasing Deficit Can Be Traced to GOP Tax Cuts - Americans For Tax Fairness

Giveaways to Rich & Corporations Under Bush & Trump Have Caused Over Half Of Budget Shortfalls This Century Today’s monthly budget report again demonstrates that the federal deficit has been largely driven by tax cuts for the rich and corporations enacted by Republican politicians over the past...

americansfortaxfairness.org

Cutting spending doesn’t exist and has never existed.

The US doesn’t function how your home life functions Bama.

Skimming this babble..Cut taxes AND spending you're being disingenuous. We need to do both. Ah u don't know what purchase power is. You don't understand inflation. Sounds about right. Comm manifesto is stupid because communism is slavery. A bunch of research on why u need govt money...You're furious

Now look up what is the problem with the us racking up debt since you like research and how it's just another tax along with the problem with adding money to the money supply out of thin air. Wait u believe we can just keep spending and money can be infinitely injected into the economy with no issue. Holy inflation I'm done this is why I don't argue with communist. Enjoy pushing wheelbarrows of dollars and bread lines comrade.

 

[Professor Emeritus]

2024 majority of socialist are pink haired white women, blue haired fakkits and nikkas who think like white women. Socialism communism and Marxism = we are all broke and all die of starvation.

You're an idiot who watches Fox News and never goes outside if you believe that bullshyt. Clearly someone who doesn't live in a black neighborhood and has never met actual socialists in their life.

I mean, fukk, even an ignorant person like yourself can look at the socialists in the US House right now.

Majority of the socialists in the US House are Black and there's not a single white woman among them. "But but pink haired white women and blue haired fakkits!"

 

[buzzkill]

You're an idiot who watches Fox News and never goes outside if you believe that bullshyt. Clearly someone who doesn't live in a black neighborhood and has never met actual socialists in their life.

I mean, fukk, even an ignorant person like yourself can look at the socialists in the US House right now.

Majority of the socialists in the US House are Black and there's not a single white woman among them. "But but pink haired white women and blue haired fakkits!"

Ok bro. you don't think like a pink haired white woman.

 

[Professor Emeritus]

"I don't think like White women, I'm a CAPITALIST!" has got to be the most unintentionally funny political claim I've heard so far today.

Why do all the women on Fox News look and dress alike? Republicans prefer blondes

From pundits like Ann Coulter to Kellyanne Conway, American rightwingers are a uniform vision of don’t scare-the-horses dressing

www.theguardian.com

The rise of Tomi Lahren, the media star lampooned as 'white power Barbie'

The Blaze’s up-and-coming conservative TV pundit is seen by many as the new Ann Coulter – and, she says, she is #NeverHillary through and through

www.theguardian.com

“They Say We’re White Supremacists”: Inside the Strange World of Conservative College Women

Young Republican women are aggrieved, outnumbered, defiant. And they aren’t going to apologize for loving the guy in the White House.

www.vanityfair.com

Four GOP Women Brand Themselves as ‘Conservative Squad’

The four white women appeared on “Fox and Friends” Thursday morning to promote their fundraising website.

www.thedailybeast.com

 

[Mister Terrific]

Skimming this babble..Cut taxes AND spending you're being disingenuous. We need to do both.

We aren’t going to cut spending as running a country is expensive. Republicans aren’t cutting spending and democrats aren’t cutting spending.

Like I said the government isn’t your home Bama and if you don’t like government spending move to Burkina Faso. You won’t have to worry about it

Ah u don't know what purchase power is.

There multiple contexts and definitions of what “purchasing” (not purchase you moron) power could refer to.

Please explain what specifically you are referring to.

You don't understand inflation.

You understand inflation? You realize economists aren’t certain why inflation happens and usually attribute it to multitudes of factors. If you’ve figured out what causes inflation I would also like to see your Nobel prize.

Soundw about right. Comm manifesto is stupid because communism is slavery.

I said specifics Bama

A bunch of research on why u need govt money...You're furious

I’m fine. Your low IQ buffoonery is amusing to me.

Now look up what is the problem with the us racking up debt since you like research and how it's just another tax along with adding money to the money supply.

Explain it to us. What’s the problem with the US “racking up debt” and its effect on taxes and adding money to the money supply.

 

[RennisDeynolds]

Emerald kekeing about this while receiving fed subsidies in the 10s of billions with high level clearance as a government contractor


Boot this animal cac out and pull the contracts

 

[buzzkill]

We aren’t going to cut spending as running a country is expensive. Republicans aren’t cutting spending and democrats aren’t cutting spending.

Like I said the government isn’t your home Bama and if you don’t like government spending move to Burkina Faso. You won’t have to worry about it




There multiple contexts and definitions of what “purchasing” (not purchase you moron) power could refer to.

Please explain what specifically you are referring to.



You understand inflation? You realize economists aren’t certain why inflation happens and usually attribute it to multitudes of factors. If you’ve figured out what causes inflation I would also like to see your Nobel prize.



I said specifics Bama




I’m fine. Your low IQ buffoonery is amusing to me.


Explain it to us. What’s the problem with the US “racking up debt” and its effect on taxes and adding money to the money supply.

"It's purchasing power" lol got me bud. I'm on my phone. Yo you are hilarious. Ah so inflation isn't due to increasing money supply. Wow. We can just print and spend without care. Sounds right

 

[buzzkill]

"I don't think like White women, I'm a CAPITALIST!" has got to be the most unintentionally funny political claim I've heard so far today.

Why do all the women on Fox News look and dress alike? Republicans prefer blondes

From pundits like Ann Coulter to Kellyanne Conway, American rightwingers are a uniform vision of don’t scare-the-horses dressing

www.theguardian.com

The rise of Tomi Lahren, the media star lampooned as 'white power Barbie'

The Blaze’s up-and-coming conservative TV pundit is seen by many as the new Ann Coulter – and, she says, she is #NeverHillary through and through

www.theguardian.com

“They Say We’re White Supremacists”: Inside the Strange World of Conservative College Women

Young Republican women are aggrieved, outnumbered, defiant. And they aren’t going to apologize for loving the guy in the White House.

www.vanityfair.com

Four GOP Women Brand Themselves as ‘Conservative Squad’

The four white women appeared on “Fox and Friends” Thursday morning to promote their fundraising website.

www.thedailybeast.com

I can post articles and pics of black conservatives, business men and capitalist. The whole feminist movement was started by ww. Actually just look up what percentage of progressive Marxists that need the govt to fund their lives are women... What is your point goofy?

 

[im not you]

people still using communism as a boogieman in 2024

@buzzkill go ahead and tell us all the benefits of the tax cuts that went through in 2017

 

[Mister Terrific]

"It's purchasing power" lol got me bud. I'm on my phone. Yo you are hilarious. Ah so inflation isn't due to increasing money supply. Wow. We can just print and spend without care. Sounds right

Forget about that for now Bama, we don’t want you to hurt yourself.

Remember how you claimed we need to cut taxes and cut spending to balance the budget, let’s see exactly what that entails



The exact amount of savings needed for full budget balance is uncertain and will depend both on budget projections in the Congressional Budget Office's forthcoming ten-year baseline as well as the path of any proposed policies. In the recent CRFB Fiscal Blueprint for Reducing Debt and Inflation, we estimated achieving balance would require roughly $14.6 trillion of deficit reduction through 2032, including over $2 trillion of policy savings (and nearly $400 billion of interest savings) in 2032 alone.1

To achieve these savings without more revenue, we estimate all spending in 2032 would need to be cut by 26 percent; this figure rises to 33 percent if defense and veterans spending is exempted from the cuts. For a sense of magnitude, applying this cut across the board would mean reducing annual Social Security benefits for a typical new retiree by $10,000 to $13,000 in 2032. It would also mean laying off 1.1 to 1.4 million federal employees (more than two-thirds of the civilian workforce if the military were exempted) and removing 20 to 25 million people from Medicaid eligibility.

Excluding Social Security and Medicare from cuts would make the task of balance even more unrealistic. Without touching spending on defense, veterans, or Social Security, all other spending would need to be cut by 51 percent. Also excluding Medicare would mean that remaining spending would need to ultimately be cut by 85 percent.


The figures above do not include additional savings that might be necessary if policymakers choose to extend $3 trillion worth of tax cuts that have expired or are set to expire in the coming years.

To give a sense of just how challenging achieving balance in 2032 by controlling spending is, it would require doing one of the following:

• Eliminating virtually all defense and nondefense discretionary spending programs;
• Cutting Medicaid spending in half while eliminating all other mandatory spending outside of Social Security and Medicare;
• Eliminating all nondefense discretionary spending and ending the entire Medicaid program;
• Repealing Medicare, all income security programs, and all refundable tax credits; or
• Discontinuing all Social Security retirement and survivors' benefits.

What Would It Take to Balance the Budget? | Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget

2023-01-12-We have published an updated analysis "

www.crfb.org

Might as well take everyone over 60 and ship them into space.


Now explain what you mean by debt effecting purchasing power goof troop

 

[buzzkill]

Forget about that for now Bama, we don’t want you to hurt yourself.

Remember how you claimed we need to cut taxes and cut spending to balance the budget, let’s see exactly what that entails



The exact amount of savings needed for full budget balance is uncertain and will depend both on budget projections in the Congressional Budget Office's forthcoming ten-year baseline as well as the path of any proposed policies. In the recent CRFB Fiscal Blueprint for Reducing Debt and Inflation, we estimated achieving balance would require roughly $14.6 trillion of deficit reduction through 2032, including over $2 trillion of policy savings (and nearly $400 billion of interest savings) in 2032 alone.1

To achieve these savings without more revenue, we estimate all spending in 2032 would need to be cut by 26 percent; this figure rises to 33 percent if defense and veterans spending is exempted from the cuts. For a sense of magnitude, applying this cut across the board would mean reducing annual Social Security benefits for a typical new retiree by $10,000 to $13,000 in 2032. It would also mean laying off 1.1 to 1.4 million federal employees (more than two-thirds of the civilian workforce if the military were exempted) and removing 20 to 25 million people from Medicaid eligibility.

Excluding Social Security and Medicare from cuts would make the task of balance even more unrealistic. Without touching spending on defense, veterans, or Social Security, all other spending would need to be cut by 51 percent. Also excluding Medicare would mean that remaining spending would need to ultimately be cut by 85 percent.


The figures above do not include additional savings that might be necessary if policymakers choose to extend $3 trillion worth of tax cuts that have expired or are set to expire in the coming years.

To give a sense of just how challenging achieving balance in 2032 by controlling spending is, it would require doing one of the following:

• Eliminating virtually all defense and nondefense discretionary spending programs;
• Cutting Medicaid spending in half while eliminating all other mandatory spending outside of Social Security and Medicare;
• Eliminating all nondefense discretionary spending and ending the entire Medicaid program;
• Repealing Medicare, all income security programs, and all refundable tax credits; or
• Discontinuing all Social Security retirement and survivors' benefits.

What Would It Take to Balance the Budget? | Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget

2023-01-12-We have published an updated analysis "

www.crfb.org

Might as well take everyone over 60 and ship them into space.


Now explain what you mean by debt effecting purchasing power goof troop

Gotta ween folks off of govt titty. I mean we will run out of social security and govt money no matter if u believe in Fed being able to print and the govt being able to spend without care. It's not sustainable and I'm young enough that I will never see SSI...Unfortunately we can't just spend and print money, money doesn't grow on trees. In the real world there are consequences. Good luck comrade.

 

[Mister Terrific]

Gotta ween folks off of govt titty.

By self destructing society? Did you even read the analysis or is that too much strain for your brain? I’d rather not follow the economic advice of a low IQ Bama who couldn’t balance a target gift card

I mean we will run out of social security and govt money no matter

Myth No. 1: Social Security is going broke​

Reality: Social Security is facing an ongoing shortfall and needs shoring up, but it’s not going bankrupt.

Social Security is complicated for many reasons, not the least of which is the way it’s funded. Most of Social Security’s income comes from a dedicated 12.4% payroll tax that’s evenly split by employees and employers, with the workers’ part deducted from each paycheck. If you’re self-employed, you pay the full amount, less a deduction for paying self-employment tax.

Revenue also comes from investment income and taxes paid by retirees (and others) on their benefits.

That revenue flows into the two main Social Security trust funds:

• Old-Age and Survivors Insurance (OASI), which pays retirement, spousal, and survivor benefits
• Disability Insurance (DI), which pays disability benefits

Surplus vs. shortfall​

Since the 1980s, the money coming in had been more than enough to cover Social Security’s expenses. That changed in 2021, when a long-predicted event occurred: The tide turned, and Social Security expenses exceeded income by about $41 billion. To close the gap, the trustees began tapping the pool of reserve funds (which is finite).

Myth No. 3: With no obvious solutions, Social Security could be eliminated or privatized​

Reality: Not likely. Policymakers have been debating a range of interventions, and many people are confident that Congresswill act in time.

Social Security isn’t popular with everyone, but the program enjoys strong bipartisan support from enough voters and lawmakers that it’s unlikely to fail soon, if ever. And although it may seem that nothing much is happening to avert the Social Security crisis, policymakers are developing and debating a range of potential solutions, including:

• Raising the full retirement age (currently 67 for those born in 1960 or later) to 68 or 69. Boosting the age would lessen the demand on the system, but it might strain some workers, such as manual laborers, who could find it difficult to work longer.
• Increasing the Social Security payroll tax, which could bring in revenue to cover the shortfall.
• Eliminating the maximum taxable wage cap, allowing a wider swath of wages to be taxed, which could also shore up the program. Wages now are taxed up to only the first $168,600 earned.

Although Americans notoriously resist tax increases, in this case, the majority say they’d rather secure Social Security’s future with higher taxes than by reducing benefits, according to a Gallup poll.

The more pressing question is: When will lawmakers and advocates arrive at an intervention that makes sense and take action?

The bottom line​

Despite the rumors that Social Security could be on its last legs, the nearly 90-year-old program is not going anywhere, according to the trustees who oversee it.
That said, Social Security has been running a shortfall since 2021. The gap between income and expenses is being covered by withdrawals from a pool of surplus funds—but that pool is finite, and without intervention, it will be depleted by 2034. At that point, if nothing is done, retirees can expect to get about three-quarters of their anticipated benefit amounts.
But that’s not likely to happen. Policymakers are working on feasible solutions, one (or a combination) of which would ensure full benefits for everyone, even if the surplus does run out. It’s just a matter of when.

Britannica Money

Social Security faces a gap between income and expenses. If Congress doesn’t find a remedy for the shortfall, Social Security benefits could be reduced by about 25%.

www.britannica.com

if u believe in Fed being able to print and the govt being able to spend without care. It's not sustainable

Why isn’t it sustainable? Explain what will happen.

Come on c00n buffoon. Explain what purchasing power is. Explain what debt is. Explain what happens if the “fed” prints money?

Don’t just fear monger because you heard some cac tell you these things. Explain in detail what these terms mean.

and I'm young enough that I will never see SSI...

God willing