Elizabeth Warren's Aggressive Questioning Prompts Anger From Wall Street

[Bboystyle]

Let me know how all that "female leadership" is working out in India.......
I'm sorry was their a retort to that? But hey I'm not hating on you. When that female president comes in 2016(Warren or Clinton) keep banking on them to be the most progressive in history.......

We aint India breh.

So u say we continue to nominate these rich old white men (aside from Obama) as presidents? fukk the facts that Hilary has been one of the best political figures in the past decade?


Yeah but lets look to India as our future if we ever nominate a female

 

[CASHAPP]

We aint India breh.

So u say we continue to nominate these rich old white men (aside from Obama) as presidents? fukk the facts that Hilary has been one of the bets political figures in the past decade?


Yeah but lets look to India as our future if we ever nominate a female

Breh I never said I am against a woman being a president. I have no issue with it at all. The only slight thing is that in terms of health reasons I would prefer Warren over Clinton.

I know women are genetically known to do better in social work(teaching, nursing,etc ) and this also includes politics.

I just quoted you beacuse of the "greedy" comment because no offense but although like everyone I am curious about a female president and I am also looking for change always, I think folks have been going too far with the whole mindset of how a female president would be definitely different than all the male presidents

We have no idea what the future holds. If you google "political positions" between Obama,Warren,and Clinton there are not that much differences honestly accept for slight things.

Hell....Warren opposes marijuana even more than Obama does.

Once again I have no issue with a female President I am just saying we have to be very wary of the whole Honeymoon period as with Obama from years ago

 

[Hiphoplives4eva]

yes im sure u idiot.


Sometime i wonder if you nikkas just quote to use smiley's

No, your the idiot if you think simply "electing a female" is the answer the worlds problems. Especially Hillary...

 

[Bboystyle]

No, your the idiot if you think simply "electing a female" is the answer the worlds problems. Especially Hillary...

its not just a female in general u moron. These two females have been putting these corrupted rich white men on blast. That's what we need

 

[NZA]

hillary is not someone you vote for if you want to clean up corruption and greed. hillary is someone you vote for if you want a slightly left of center, competent, reasonable, and rational manager of the status quo. hillary is obama with less nuance.

not saying that is a bad thing, either. she's the person most likely to get my vote in 2016, but i know it's not going to be kumbaya and throwing bankers in jail all day, err day.

 

[Dusty Bake Activate]

Breh I never said I am against a woman being a president. I have no issue with it at all. The only slight thing is that in terms of health reasons I would prefer Warren over Clinton.

I know women are genetically known to do better in social work(teaching, nursing,etc ) and this also includes politics.

I just quoted you beacuse of the "greedy" comment because no offense but although like everyone I am curious about a female president and I am also looking for change always, I think folks have been going too far with the whole mindset of how a female president would be definitely different than all the male presidents

We have no idea what the future holds. If you google "political positions" between Obama,Warren,and Clinton there are not that much differences honestly accept for slight things.

Hell....Warren opposes marijuana even more than Obama does.

Once again I have no issue with a female President I am just saying we have to be very wary of the whole Honeymoon period as with Obama from years ago

In recent history, it has been women who have been the only people in government that have been sounding the alarm bells and trying to hold these Wall street crooks feet to the fire. That is a fact that is undeniable. Brooksley Born, Sheila Bair, Elizabeth Warren, a couple more people I'm forgetting. Read Ron Suskind's book Confidence Men. When greedy pompous a$$holes like Rubin and Summers were telling us to repeal Glas-Steagall and shadow markets of massive unregulated derivatives were all fine and dandy, it was women in government saying and losing their jobs over it. Based on that, I'd say yes we do need more women in watchdog positions over Wall Street in government.

 

[Julius Skrrvin]

 

[CBSkyline]

Elizabeth Warren Asks The Most Obvious Question Ever And Stumps A Bunch Of Bank Regulators

Someone drank too much coffee this morning before a Senate Banking Committee hearing and decided to "do the job we hired her for" and ask the question the rest of us have been "asking for years."

...

•At 1:20, she asks the question we've all been wanting someone to ask FOREVER. Then a government lawyer stumbles over his words.
•At 2:20, she rattles off another one. Then a government lawyer stumbles over his words.
•At 2:55, she asks another lawyer the same question. Said lawyer then tries to not stumble over her words.
•At 3:25, she asks the same question again. That lawyer asks for some time.
•At 3:45, she gets our back and goes for the knockout punch.


"Too Big to Fail has become Too Big for Trial" - YouTube

I like how polite she is even when putting cats on notice. She doesn't have to raise her voice loudly to get her point across. No grandstanding or trying to posture like some politicians do. She just gets right down to business and ask the questions we've been wanting to ask for years.

 

[Melt_Man]

That's my senator

Only reason why I voted last election.

 

[mastermind]

I love this old white woman. I really do

 

[Pistolvania Prince]

I love this old white woman. I really do

 

[Julius Skrrvin]

i remember the first time i heard about this woman i saw this:

love at first sight