Educated Brother Gives White Nationalist A Lesson on European History. (Update: Cacs are trying to get him swatted)

Ty Daniels

Superstar
Joined
Dec 13, 2019
Messages
1,945
Reputation
3,017
Daps
13,499
You gotta link to that essay, breh?

Benjamin Franklin essay America as a land of opportunity

BENJAMIN FRANKLIN
Which leads me to add one Remark: That the Number of purely white People in the World is proportionably very small. All Africa is black or tawny. Asia chiefly tawny. America (exclusive of the new Comers) wholly so. And in Europe, the Spaniards, Italians, French, Russians and Swedes, are generally of what we call a swarthy Complexion; as are the Germans also, the Saxons only excepted, who with the English, make the principal Body of White People on the Face of the Earth. I could wish their Numbers were increased. And while we are, as I may call it, Scouring our Planet, by clearing America of Woods, and so making this Side of our Globe reflect a brighter Light to the Eyes of Inhabitants in mars or Venus, why should we in the Sight of Superior Beings, darken its People? why increase the Sons of Africa, by Planting them in America, where we have so fair an Opportunity, by excluding all Blacks and Tawneys, of increasing the lovely White and Red? But perhaps I am partial to the complexion of my Country, for such Kind of Partiality is natural to Mankind.
 

GrindtooFilthy

World Class SuperVillain
Supporter
Joined
Feb 22, 2014
Messages
16,024
Reputation
3,052
Daps
43,041
Reppin
MA, CT, NH
This is a stretch. There's no doubt some if the Bible's authors were of African descent, given the time period and region of the world were Christianity and Judaism developed, but it doesn't make sense so Africans wrong the bible.

Paul spread Jesus' teaching across the Med and West Asia. But nothing was being put to parchment or table or whatever until decades after Paul, Peter and Jesus was dead. The bible, as we know it with the 4 gosphels, wasn't a thing until like 200 AD. They were most likely written by followers of the apostles or people who heard the stories Jesus, first hand. Each was written in distinct styles, nonw of which hint of an African authorship. They were written for Hebrew, Hellenistic and Aramaic audiences.

Now some of the most preserved Bible books are African... namely the Dead Sea Scrolls and the books in the Ethiopian Bible that were omitted from the Catholic Bible. But I wouldn't say Africans wrote the Bible.
Yeah that’s what’s blowing me, people say Africa but really it’s just east Africa and on top of that it’s a small minority of people within east Africa. I have no Idea how that applies to the whole continent especially when we have no blood ties to these people outside of it just being cultural or by proximity.

If you understood west African, Central African, South African, history at its core we are mostly like not the groups they are talking about. It’s mainly the horners they are referencing.
 

CW_1991

Banned
Joined
Oct 3, 2014
Messages
7,382
Reputation
1,358
Daps
24,279
You gotta link to that essay, breh?
Paragraph 24




Did not want to risk planting the "sons of Africa" into their new found home and be bred out.
 

Secure Da Bag

Veteran
Joined
Dec 20, 2017
Messages
40,704
Reputation
20,835
Daps
127,546
Paragraph 24



In that essay, they said the French, Germans, Russians, and Italians were swarthy. All that could mean is that those white people didn't look like ghosts.
 

NO-BadAzz

Superstar
Joined
Sep 11, 2015
Messages
10,847
Reputation
1,871
Daps
31,925
To continue the "Christian crusades" this was how Europeans/England start to come out of its "dark age" I posted that the Vikings came with some of civilization, they were still savages and fukked up white folks. I must add that on these crusades many knights took their favorite boys with them to be their sexual partner. dogs, pigs, and goats were used in bestiality in Europe and on these voyages.

Christian ships of the 11th century were unable to navigate the Red Sea, nor did Europeans of that time have time or enough knowledge of geography to travel overland to the Indies or East. The Europeans understood that they could gain more by "trading" than fighting with the Africans/Black folks (Muslims who they would soon look as an enemy and use to team up to cause these so call "holy wars") This trading gave them exposure and access to superior culture of the Near and Middle East which stimulated a spirit of inquiry which during the 14 and 15th century caused Europe to heightened their intellect a little bit.

One interested thing that I learned was the "Magna Carta" which was a English constitutional oligarchy (the few ruling the many) which was very different from the Afrikan constitutional system which was largely ruled by democratic republic.
The rural land legally belonged to the King, who had their Earls overseeing the land, the "Magna Carta" reversed this order in a little, yet in still feudal law bore down heavily on England's majoirty serf population.
 

Secure Da Bag

Veteran
Joined
Dec 20, 2017
Messages
40,704
Reputation
20,835
Daps
127,546
Swarthy means black

Which leads me to add one Remark: That the Number of purely white People in the World is proportionably very small. All Africa is black or tawny. Asia chiefly tawny. America (exclusive of the new Comers) wholly so. And in Europe, the Spaniards, Italians, French, Russians and Swedes, are generally of what we call a swarthy Complexion; as are the Germans also, the Saxons only excepted, who with the English, make the principal Body of White People on the Face of the Earth. I could wish their Numbers were increased. And while we are, as I may call it, Scouring our Planet, by clearing America of Woods, and so making this Side of our Globe reflect a brighter Light to the Eyes of Inhabitants in mars or Venus, why should we in the Sight of Superior Beings, darken its People? why increase the Sons of Africa, by Planting them in America, where we have so fair an Opportunity, by excluding all Blacks and Tawneys, of increasing the lovely White and Red? But perhaps I am partial to the complexion of my Country, for such Kind of Partiality is natural to Mankind.
 

NO-BadAzz

Superstar
Joined
Sep 11, 2015
Messages
10,847
Reputation
1,871
Daps
31,925
In that essay, they said the French, Germans, Russians, and Italians were swarthy. All that could mean is that those white people didn't look like ghosts.

Between 1347 and 1550, the bubonic plague killed off 1/3 of Europe's population, except in those areas that were controlled by the advanced medical science of the Moorish Empire. The backward medical profession in western Europe at the time was no match for the pestilence and its usual treatments of syphoning blood and attaching leeches to the body.

The 100 years of War between England and France (1337-1453), the battle at Crecy killed off 30,000 men (that's a lot of men in one battle alone)
The War of Roses (1454) were after the 100 years wars, this war was between the Lancasters and York families, which killed off more folks. This war went on for more than 30 years
Syphilis was running huge, wiping off the women, many of them and men.

The kids were being sold to slavery or more common, killed, a law had to put in place for the men to stop killing their own children lol.
 

CW_1991

Banned
Joined
Oct 3, 2014
Messages
7,382
Reputation
1,358
Daps
24,279
Here's something else; John Macky a relatively unknown historical figure (has a place in the dictionary of national biography)


Dictionary of National Biography Dictionary of National Biography - Google Search


Made a publication in the 1700s of all of the nobilities physical descriptions that he was spying on.

Few examples






There's plenty more. Go on Wikipedia to look these people up and you're going to see a full-blown pasty cac in a wig.
 

NO-BadAzz

Superstar
Joined
Sep 11, 2015
Messages
10,847
Reputation
1,871
Daps
31,925
@Secure Da Bag

That's what "he" referred to them the German tribe confiscated and adopted the name Saxon so I'm not sure why he's using that term in reference to Germans, There were Jutes, Saxons, Angles, Nordics, Scythians, Celts (before they combined and other Germanic tribes and these group of white men were not referred as Swarthy

There were many terms referred Niger black folks, is another term, which meant black.
 

NO-BadAzz

Superstar
Joined
Sep 11, 2015
Messages
10,847
Reputation
1,871
Daps
31,925
Julius Ceaser when he landed in Britain the tribe he saw ruling over the Celti-Iberians were called "Silures" Tacitus, a Roman writer of the period, describes them as "swarthy" (The German word for Black) with curly hair. Julius Ceaser called them Britons a term later adapted by the English as a designation for the United Kingdom of Great Britain.
 

CW_1991

Banned
Joined
Oct 3, 2014
Messages
7,382
Reputation
1,358
Daps
24,279
So swarthy don't mean black. It means non-pasty/not a ghost.
Bro this honestly sounds like cope


@Secure Da Bag

That's what "he" referred to them the German tribe confiscated and adopted the name Saxon so I'm not sure why he's using that term in reference to Germans, There were Jutes, Saxons, Angles, Nordics, Scythians, Celts (before they combined and other Germanic tribes and these group of white men were not referred as Swarthy

There were many terms referred Niger black folks, is another term, which meant black.


Yep
 
Top