If ainge gives up fultz for Danny granger 2.0 + a future pick, that would be a horrendous dealThat's the big question
Or ainge just takes Tatum? But DSJ at 3 would be dumb
If ainge gives up fultz for Danny granger 2.0 + a future pick, that would be a horrendous dealThat's the big question
Or ainge just takes Tatum? But DSJ at 3 would be dumb
Do you nikkaz actually listen to what's going on?There aren't any guards in either the 2018 or 2019 draft projected to be as good as Fultz, they need a lead guard.
That's the big question
Or ainge just takes Tatum? But DSJ at 3 would be dumb
- Brett BrownI’m talking about a point guard. And so I intend on trying this. You always get into conversations, “well that’s fine, who does he guard?” I don’t see him guarding the opposition’s point guard.
He's proven that he can score and rebound at an official rate. And he's good in transition, which perfect for the pace we are trying to play.You say this shyt as if Randle's a proven player. Give it up. The writing was on the wall long ago.
He's proven that he can score and rebound at an official rate. And he's good in transition, which perfect for the pace we are trying to play.
Where did this myth that lonzo is not athletic come from...he's a GREAT athlete
Ehh I disagree breh. There would be too many young guys needing the ball (Embiid, Simmons, Fultz, Saric) and then add Lowry. They should just focus on the young guys getting their reps for another season or two. Lowry at 31 doesn't fit their timeline either.How would Lowry "limit" Fultz's development? It's actually quite the opposite.
notice that a certain someone is not in the picture
And 2 white guys are. Damn, Boston.
This gives us insurance in case Ben isn't an effective perimeter option. We can just use him like a more effective Blake and run bunch of PnR with one of the most advanced PnR freshmen in recent memory. If Ben is legit though than all bets are off yall niccas in trouble.