Economists Say Inflation Would Be Worse Under Trump Than Biden

bnew

Veteran
Joined
Nov 1, 2015
Messages
51,642
Reputation
7,896
Daps
148,364

Economists Say Inflation Would Be Worse Under Trump Than Biden​


In a Wall Street Journal survey, economists see Trump’s plans to raise tariffs and crack down on illegal immigration as putting upward pressure on prices​


By
Paul Kiernan
and
Anthony DeBarros

July 11, 2024 9:00 pm ET

01b4b45ddf60438140451b7c3c957ab7cc24f170.jpg
Former President Donald Trump has promised the largest deportation of unauthorized immigrants in history.

Donald Trump loves to remind voters that President Biden has overseen the highest inflation in 40 years.

But don’t count on Trump, the presumptive Republican nominee for president, to bring inflation down faster than Biden if he wins the presidential election in November.

Most economists believe inflation, deficits and interest rates would be higher during a second Trump administration than if Biden remains in the White House, according to a quarterly survey of forecasters by The Wall Street Journal.
“I think there is a real risk that inflation will reaccelerate under a Trump presidency,” said Bernard Baumohl, chief global economist at the Economic Outlook Group. That would likely lead the Federal Reserve to set interest rates higher than if inflation continues its downward trajectory, he added.
The Journal’s survey, conducted July 5-9, received responses from 68 professional forecasters from business, Wall Street and academia. Of the 50 who answered questions about Trump and Biden, 56% said inflation would be higher under another Trump term than a Biden term, versus 16% who said the opposite. The remainder saw no material difference.

2db3c665bb73dd41b4680396c081690791c32c0f.png


Biden is under growing pressure to step aside as the Democratic presidential nominee. But economists’ views of inflation and interest rates appear mostly driven by Trump’s policy preferences, in particular on trade and immigration. It is unlikely those assessments would change substantially with a different Democratic candidate.

Trump has proposed a 10% across-the-board tariff on imports and a 60% or higher tariff on imports from China. He has also promised the largest deportation of unauthorized immigrants in history, which might reduce the supply of labor in some industries.

Biden has taken several steps to allow unauthorized immigrants to stay in the U.S. He has also issued executive actions aimed at reducing illegal crossings.

It also depends on Congress and courts​


It is impossible to know which of Trump’s or Biden’s policies will be implemented. That will depend on the makeup of Congress and other considerations, such as litigation. Trump’s plan to deport asylum seekers, for instance, would likely be challenged in court.
“It is hard to know, he says so many things that are so extreme,” said Joel Naroff, head of the consulting firm Naroff Economics, who sees higher inflation under Biden but higher deficits and interest rates under Trump.

Moreover, presidents generally have much less influence on the economy and inflation than the business cycle, external shocks such as to the price of oil and the Federal Reserve’s interest-rate policies.

97c1a2912a3196b0bd1e710384defce6ab8a1b29.png


Consumer prices have risen 19% since Biden took office in January 2021, fueled by a rush of government spending, some of it enacted under Trump; shortages of goods and labor; and supply-chain disruption in the wake of the pandemic. During Trump’s four years as president, prices increased 7.8%.

On Thursday, the Labor Department reported that year-over-year inflation as measured by the consumer-price index fell to 3% in June from 3.3% in May. Economists surveyed by the Journal expect it to ease to 2.8% by December and 2.3% by the end of next year.

On average, economists expect U.S. gross domestic product to expand 1.7% this year after inflation, down from 3.1% in 2023 (based on the fourth quarter compared with a year earlier); unemployment to remain slightly above 4% through 2026; and payrolls to expand by roughly 131,000 jobs a month over the next year. On average, they put the probability of recession in the coming 12 months at 28%. Forecasts changed little from the Journal’s last survey, in April, when economists saw 1.7% GDP growth this year and a 29% probability of recession.

860ee59dc98521b6cfcd3ae32a1d5521856e7e79.png


Differing tax plans drive deficit risks​


Fifty-one percent of economists anticipate larger federal budget deficits under a Trump presidency, compared with 22% under Biden. Early in his term in the White House, Trump and congressional Republicans cut individual, corporate and estate taxes. Some of those cuts expire at the end of 2025. Trump wants to extend all of them, whereas Biden would allow tax cuts for the wealthiest Americans to expire. He would also raise the corporate tax rate and increase several other taxes.

Larger deficits tend to put upward pressure on inflation and interest rates; 59% of economists think rates would be higher under Trump, versus 16% under Biden. But several economists stressed that neither candidate has shown much interest in reining in deficits, particularly when his party controlled Congress.
“I think we are very likely to be running large deficits regardless of who the next president is,” said Matthew Luzzetti, chief U.S. economist at Deutsche Bank Securities. “The bigger inflation difference is probably going to come from policies like trade.”

1004dfd34521d45ef75200b9520eeecce2d76190.jpg
Inflation as measured by the consumer-price index slowed in June.

Deutsche Bank estimates a universal tariff of the sort Trump has outlined would increase overall prices by 1% to 2%. By contrast, high immigration in recent years might have reduced inflation by up to 0.5 percentage point by easing labor shortages after the pandemic, Luzzetti said.

Some economists cited the risk that Trump will attempt to curb the Fed’s independence. During his first presidency, Trump often voiced frustration with Fed Chair Jerome Powell, who resisted his calls to reduce interest rates. A group of Trump’s allies are drawing up plans to give the president more say over monetary policy, the Journal has reported.

A few economists think another Biden term would bring higher inflation, deficits and interest rates—mainly because of Democrats’ penchant for government spending. Biden’s spending plans include an expanded child tax credit.

Stephen Stanley, chief U.S. economist at Santander, sees less daylight between Democrats and Republicans on trade and immigration than four years ago. He noted that Trump failed to install loyalists to the Fed in 2019 because of objections in the Senate. Trump’s last two confirmed Fed nominees, Michelle Bowman and Christopher Waller, have generally been more inclined to raise interest rates than Biden’s picks.
“I take a lot of the more extreme things that I’ve seen with a grain of salt,” Stanley said. “The Trump policies move in the direction of higher inflation, all else equal, but I don’t think the difference is going to be stark.”

4feece7bb97e38b14cd55bcfe99bb46045957139.png
Cheap Chinese goods helped keep inflation low in the early 2000s, but at the cost of U.S. manufacturing. As those imports surge again, here is what has changed and what it means for American jobs. Photo: Waldo Swiegers/Bloomberg News
 

bnew

Veteran
Joined
Nov 1, 2015
Messages
51,642
Reputation
7,896
Daps
148,364

A second Trump term could actually make inflation worse​

by Nicholas Sargen, opinion contributor - 05/24/24 11:30 AM ET

With the presidential election less than six months away and Donald Trump leading in key swing states, investors and the public are fixated on high inflation.

The prevalent view is that inflation was low during Trump’s presidency, and Biden’s economic policies are to blame for the substantial price increases during the past three years. Consequently, many people presume inflation will be lower if Trump wins the presidency than if Bidenis reelected.

This assessment may not pan out, however, for two reasons.

One consideration is that global inflation was much lower during Trump’s presidency than today. For example, from 2017 to 2020, consumer price inflation averaged only 1.5 percent per annum in the advanced economies (versus 1.8 percent in the U.S.) according to International Monetary Fund data.

Moreover, both the Bank of Japan and the European Central Bank were concerned about the threat of price deflation then, and they pursued negative interest-rate policies, while U.S. interest rates were low but positive.

During the fallout from the COVID-19 pandemic, inflation subsequently spiked in the U.S. and abroad due to supply chain shortages and policies to counter higher unemployment. While the pace eased considerably last year, U.S. inflation has proved sticky of late and is running at about 3-3.5 percent. If it stays elevated and Trump wins the election, he would have to contend with inflation that is above the Fed’s 2 percent target for the first time.

The second consideration is that the economic policies Trump and his advisors are considering could exacerbate inflation.

In a recent Project Syndicate commentary, Maurice Obstfeld, former chief economist of the IMF, contends that several policy proposals that Trump’s advisors have floated would revive 1970s-style inflation. One proposal would increase presidential influence over Fed interest-rate decisions and rulemaking, while another calls for weakening the U.S. dollar to reduce the U.S. trade deficit.

The proposal relating to the Fed’s independence was cited in a Wall Street Journal story. It claimed a group of Trump allies produced a secret document that outlined a way for Trump to be consulted on interest rate decisions while Fed regulations would be subject to White House review.

Although the story has not been corroborated, Trump has long favored low-interest rate policies to spur the economy. During his presidency, he criticized the Fed openly for not pursuing negative interest rate policies as Japan and the European Union had done. However, Trump stopped short of challenging the independence of the Fed in order not to roil financial markets.

The proposal on international trade and the dollar has been linked to Robert Lighthizer, who served as special trade representative in Trump’s administration and is a potential candidate for Treasury secretary. He was also the architect of the decision to increase tariffs on China and other trading partners that Trump pursued.

More recently, Lighthizer wrote a book that foresees taking an even bolder stance in which the goal would be to eliminate global trade imbalances altogether. He would do so by devaluing the dollar and increasing tariffs across the board.

Obstfeld counters that with the U.S. economy already at full employment and the Fed seeking to contain inflation, policies designed to weaken the dollar and/or to increase tariffs would drive up import prices and boost inflation. They would also pose a risk to the bond market and stock market in my view.

Nor is massive currency market intervention a viable way to depreciate the dollar. The last attempt to do so was the Plaza Accord of 1985. Since then, thedaily turnover in foreign exchange markets has soared close to $8 trillion, which makes coordinated intervention impractical today.

This leaves changes in monetary policies as the most effective way to impact the dollar. However, if the Fed were to ease monetary policy prematurely it could backfire and cause investors to sell dollar-denominated bonds, which would boost yields on them.

As Obstfeld observes, the principal reason inflation has receded from its highs is the Federal Reserve raised interest rates aggressively and has kept them at elevated levels.

He concludes: “These positive developments would have been impossible in a world where monetary policy was politicized, under presidential control and focused on the dollar’s external value than its far more crucial internal value.”

The clearest example of White House interference in monetary policy occurred ahead of the 1972 election when President Nixon pressured Fed Chair Arthur Burns to keep interest rates low as money supply growth and the economy accelerated. When wage and price controls were eliminated in 1973, inflation spiked to nearly 10 percent. It contributed to the breakdown of the Bretton Woods system of fixed exchange rates and was followed by a decade of financial market turbulence.

Weighing these considerations, investors should assess how committed Donald Trump would be to rein in inflation if he is elected president. While Trump was the beneficiary of a benign inflation environment globally during his presidency, there is little to indicate his policies contributed to low U.S. inflation: Witness the$8.4 trillion increase in federal debt that occurred, his jawboning of the Federal Reserve to lower interest rates and the increase in tariffs that raised import prices.

Looking ahead, the key risks are that the Fed could face political pressure to lower interest rates and global investors could lose confidence in the dollar if the proposals of Trump’s advisors are implemented.

Nicholas Sargen, Ph.D. is an economic consultant and is affiliated with the University of Virginia’s Darden School of Business. He has written three books including “Investing in the Trump Era: How Economic Policies Impact Financial Markets.”
Tags 2024 presidential election Donald Trump Donald Trump Inflation Joe Biden https://thehill.com/social-tags/politics-of-the-united-states/
 

bnew

Veteran
Joined
Nov 1, 2015
Messages
51,642
Reputation
7,896
Daps
148,364


Trump would make America’s inflation crisis worse, 16 Nobel economists warn​



Matt Egan


By Matt Egan, CNN

4 minute read

Updated 9:06 AM EDT, Wed June 26, 2024

A shopper peruses the refrigerated cheese offerings in a Target store in October 2023, in Sheridan, Colorado.


A shopper peruses the refrigerated cheese offerings in a Target store in October 2023, in Sheridan, Colorado.

David Zalubowski/AP/File

CNN —

Inflation remains public enemy No. 1 in today’s economy. Americans are fed up with the cost of living and former President Donald Trump says he will help.

Yet 16 Nobel Prize-winning economists are warning that Trump’s proposals wouldn’t just fail to fix inflation — they would make matters worse.

“We the undersigned are deeply concerned about the risks of a second Trump administration for the US economy,” the economists wrote in the Tuesday letter, which was first reported by Axios.

The letter, organized by famed economist Joseph Stiglitz, argued there are valid reasons to worry the Trump agenda will “reignite” inflation.

In particular, the economists point to Trump’s “fiscally irresponsible budgets” and nonpartisan research from the likes of the Peterson Institute, Oxford Economics and Allianz that finds the Trump agenda — if successfully enacted — would increase inflation.

Republican presidential candidate former President Donald Trump speaks at the Road to Majority conference in Washington, DC, on June 22.


Republican presidential candidate former President Donald Trump speaks at the Road to Majority conference in Washington, DC, on June 22.

Manuel Balce Ceneta/AP

Trump approved $8.4 trillion of new 10-year borrowing during his term — nearly twice as much as President Joe Biden has so far in office, according to fiscal watchdog group the Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget.

Not only does Trump want to extend his 2017 tax cuts — a move that the Congressional Budget Office warns would cost nearly $5 trillion — but the former president recently told CEOs during a closed-door meeting that he’d like to cut the corporate tax rate even further.

However, cutting taxes would risk accelerating an economy at a time when the Federal Reserve is working hard to slow it down to fight inflation.

“The outcome of this election will have economic repercussions for years, and possibly decades, to come,” the economists wrote in the letter. “We believe that a second Trump term would have a negative impact on the US’s economic standing in the world and a destabilizing effect on the US’s domestic economy.”

The Stiglitz-led letter did not directly mention Trump’s trade and immigration policies, but some mainstream economists warn they would be inflationary, too.

Trump has called for raising tariffs on China and all other trading partners — a move that Moody’s Analytics predicted would kill jobs and worsen inflation. Trump argues the tariffs would save jobs and punish China for trade practices that both parties are fed up with.

Biden has kept in place the vast majority of the Trump-era tariffs and recently lifted some tariffs on China, albeit in a more targeted way.

Some economists are also concerned Trump’s plans to launch an immigration crackdown and unprecedented deportations will overheat the jobs market and boost consumer prices.

A vehicle drives along the U.S. side of the US-Mexico border wall in Nogales, Ariz. on Tuesday, June 25, 2024.


A vehicle drives along the U.S. side of the US-Mexico border wall in Nogales, Ariz. on Tuesday, June 25, 2024.

Jae C. Hong/Pool/AP

In the letter, the 16 Nobel economists expressed concern about the rule of law and stability if Trump wins the White House again.

“Among the most important determinants of economics success are the rule of law and economic and policy certainty,” the letter said. “Donald Trump and the vagaries of his action and policies threaten this stability and the US’s standing in the world.”

Beyond Stiglitz, the letter was signed by Robert Shiller, who famously called the mid-2000s housing bubble, former World Bank chief economist Paul Romer, and George Akerlof, the husband of US Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen.

By contrast, the economists praised Biden’s work on the economy, arguing his major investments in infrastructure, manufacturing and climate will lower long-term inflationary pressure and ease the clean energy transition.

“While each of us has different views on the particulars of various economic policies,” the economists wrote in the letter, “we all agree that Joe Biden’s economic agenda is vastly superior to Donald Trump’s.”

In response, the Trump campaign blasted the economists and blamed Biden for high inflation.

“The American people don’t need worthless out of touch Nobel prize winners to tell them which president put more money in their pockets,” Karoline Leavitt, the Trump campaign’s national press secretary, said in a statement to CNN. “Americans know we cannot afford four more years of Bidenomics, and when President Trump is back in the White House, he will reimplement his pro-growth, pro-energy, pro-jobs agenda to bring down the cost of living and uplift all Americans.”

To be sure, economists don’t have a crystal ball, not even Nobel Prize winners.

And voters do give Trump higher marks on the economy.

As CNN’s Harry Enten has reported, an average of polls gives Trump an 18-point lead over Biden on inflation and 13 points on the economy.

In an ABC News/Ipsos poll in May, more than 80% of respondents said the economy and inflation were important in determining their vote — and on both issues Trump scored a 14-point lead over Biden.

Voters have made clear their concerns about Biden on the economy. Just 34% of Americans approved of Biden’s economic policies in a late April CNN poll and even fewer (29%) approve of Biden on inflation.

And yet some experts are concerned about what Trump’s policies would mean for the economy.

Last week, Moody’s Analytics cautioned that if Republicans sweep into power in November, a toxic mix of higher tariffs, fewer immigrants and tax cut-fueled stimulus would cause inflation to reaccelerate, unemployment to climb above 5% and the US economy to stumble into a recession.

By contrast, Moody’s found that if Biden wins and there is a divided Congress, the Fed will start cutting interest rates, inflation will go back to normal and the US economy will avoid a recession.
 

bnew

Veteran
Joined
Nov 1, 2015
Messages
51,642
Reputation
7,896
Daps
148,364
No way to prove this at all

he's literally proposing increased tariffs on products americans buy. :gucci:

Trump is proposing a 10% tariff. Economists say that amounts to a $1,700 tax on Americans.​

Trump’s new trade war would cost middle-class families at least $1,700 a year, report warns​

 

⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐

All Star
Joined
Jan 29, 2014
Messages
7,289
Reputation
-179
Daps
12,232
This is facts, trump supports billion dollar tax cuts for the wealthy and the rich, that will increase deficit and inflation and worsen the economy.
Nahh that's the surface level assumption of economically illiterate people

Lowering tax rates increases receipts by disincentiving offshore banking
 

⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐

All Star
Joined
Jan 29, 2014
Messages
7,289
Reputation
-179
Daps
12,232
how does cracking down on illegal immigration effect inflation ? Inflation is always a monetary phenomenon illegals have nothing to do with it :yeshrug:



i think inflation would be just as bad with either party IMO :manny:
This notion factors in reduced labor costs associated with the hiring of undocumented workers

he's literally proposing increased tariffs on products americans buy. :gucci:

Trump is proposing a 10% tariff. Economists say that amounts to a $1,700 tax on Americans.​

Trump’s new trade war would cost middle-class families at least $1,700 a year, report warns​


As such was the precursor for dollar stores becoming dollar-twenty five stores
 

⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐

All Star
Joined
Jan 29, 2014
Messages
7,289
Reputation
-179
Daps
12,232
This is what I hate about politics, they say this shyt like inflation isn't worse now than it was 20 years ago, the economy has done nothing but inflate for over 100 years and stageflate for the latter half of that.
*Cue Spider-Man meme*
 

Seoul Gleou

Veteran
Joined
Feb 11, 2017
Messages
10,421
Reputation
4,870
Daps
72,352
"It is impossible to know which of Trump’s or Biden’s policies will be implemented. That will depend on the makeup of Congress and other considerations, such as litigation. Trump’s [plan to deport asylum seekers](https://www.wsj.com/politics/elections/trump-immigration-plans-deportation-e91b1bc4?mod=article_inline), for instance, would likely be challenged in court.

“It is hard to know, he says so many things that are so extreme,” said Joel Naroff, head of the consulting firm Naroff Economics, who sees higher inflation under Biden but higher deficits and interest rates under Trump.

Moreover, presidents generally have much less influence on the economy and inflation than the business cycle, external shocks such as to the price of oil and the [Federal Reserve’s interest-rate policies](https://www.wsj.com/economy/central-banking/jerome-powell-senate-testimony-july-b7805d54?mod=article_inline). "
 
Top