E.Warren - Minimum wage would be ~22 if it kept up with productivity

Starman

Superstar
Supporter
Joined
May 3, 2012
Messages
15,602
Reputation
-2,945
Daps
34,026
How many companies are there without a workforce?
That would be none, but the workforce is the means to the end- profit.
If it looks stupid and sounds stupid it must be a conservative talking point.
Nope, just facts. Companies are started to make money- you don't employ people who don't help make that happen.
Why does the market exist, according to you?

The market exists as a result of numerous transactions between consumers, producers, and retailers. I probably didn't answer this question though...Could you rephrase it? Thanks.
 

The Real

Anti-Ignorance
Joined
May 8, 2012
Messages
6,353
Reputation
725
Daps
10,724
Reppin
NYC
The market exists as a result of numerous transactions between consumers, producers, and retailers. I probably didn't answer this question though...Could you rephrase it? Thanks.

You're right, I was asking for a justification as opposed to a causal history. Sorry for the vagueness.
 

Rarely-Wrong Liggins

Name another Liggins hot I'm just honest.
Staff member
Supporter
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
35,848
Reputation
12,538
Daps
137,667
Reppin
Staff
Companies exist to provide goods and/or services you nitwit. Profit is the reward for performing well. What you're thinking of is a Ponzi scheme.
 

Starman

Superstar
Supporter
Joined
May 3, 2012
Messages
15,602
Reputation
-2,945
Daps
34,026
Companies exist to provide goods and/or services you nitwit. Profit is the reward for performing well. What you're thinking of is a Ponzi scheme.

:russ:

Starting a business to make money = a Ponzi scheme?...You're not serious.

Edit:

You're right, I was asking for a justification as opposed to a causal history. Sorry for the vagueness.

I'm still not clear...Do you want benefits of the market? If so: Built in price control of goods and services, rewarding of efficiency/punishing of inefficiency, rewarding of responsiveness to customers...I'm sure I'm leaving stuff out. Is that what you're looking for?
 

MikelArteta

Moderator
Staff member
Supporter
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
249,476
Reputation
30,863
Daps
763,010
Reppin
Top 4
IT'S ALREADY HAPPENING. MORE AND MORE PEOPLE ARE MOVING IN TOGETHER. SINGLE PERSON HOUSEHOLDS ARE SHRINKING DAY BY DAY. COLLEGE KIDS ARE HAVING HARDER TIMES FINDING APARTMENTS BECAUSE NON COLLEGE KIDS ARE TAKING UP ALL THE ROOMS THAT HAVE NORMALLY BEEN RENTED OUT TO STUDENTS.

go to school they say check
get a good degree check
100k in debt and only place that will hire you is starbucks paying you min wage check
have to live at home in your moms basement check
go to school for something else waste thousands more check
 

Dank Hill

Superstar
Supporter
Joined
May 25, 2012
Messages
6,711
Reputation
1,465
Daps
23,232
I know someone who fits that exact profile except they work at checkers
 

Starman

Superstar
Supporter
Joined
May 3, 2012
Messages
15,602
Reputation
-2,945
Daps
34,026
Yes, if you're not providing goods and/or services. That's the purpose of a business.

Goods and services are a means to the end, Liggy. Profit is the end. Profit is the why. Goods and services is the how. Not the other way around.

You're a fool if you think the maker of, oh I don't know, the chair you're sitting in did it for any other reason than profit. It was created because there was something to be gained. If not, why did it cost a cent more than it was to make?
 

Rarely-Wrong Liggins

Name another Liggins hot I'm just honest.
Staff member
Supporter
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
35,848
Reputation
12,538
Daps
137,667
Reppin
Staff
Goods and services are a means to the end, Liggy. Profit is the end. Profit is the why. Goods and services is the how. Not the other way around.

You're a fool if you think the maker of, oh I don't know, the chair you're sitting in did it for any other reason than profit. It was created because there was something to be gained. If not, why did it cost a cent more than it was to make?

Can you name one legitimate business that does not provide a good and/or service? :leostare:
 
Joined
Jul 26, 2012
Messages
43,424
Reputation
2,552
Daps
105,996
Reppin
NULL
Goods and services are a means to the end, Liggy. Profit is the end. Profit is the why. Goods and services is the how. Not the other way around.

You're a fool if you think the maker of, oh I don't know, the chair you're sitting in did it for any other reason than profit. It was created because there was something to be gained. If not, why did it cost a cent more than it was to make?

I totally understand what you're saying when you stress that profit is the main objective of corporations, however, don't most corporations have some type of social responsibility or obligations to the community that they have written in their charter....

My point is, the workforce and the consumer(the people) or the main catalyst for all corporations and in essence, if unified, we can dictate their hiring practices and how they do business....
 

Rarely-Wrong Liggins

Name another Liggins hot I'm just honest.
Staff member
Supporter
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
35,848
Reputation
12,538
Daps
137,667
Reppin
Staff
:snoop:

This is the last time. No because providing goods and services is how businesses achieve their goal (hint: it's profit).

You're confusing motivation and incentive with purpose. The Bayer Corporation's purpose is to make pharmaceuticals and other chemicals. Through providing those goods and services they make money. To make money they must have and fulfill a purpose. Otherwise you just have a Ponzi Scheme.
 

Starman

Superstar
Supporter
Joined
May 3, 2012
Messages
15,602
Reputation
-2,945
Daps
34,026
I totally understand what you're saying when you stress that profit is the main objective of corporations, however, don't most corporations have some type of social responsibility or obligations to the community that they have written in their charter....

My point is, the workforce and the consumer(the people) or the main catalyst for all corporations and in essence, if unified, we can dictate their hiring practices and how they do business....

I honestly am not familiar with corporate charters or anything like that. And I don't feel like corporations owe me anything. We as a society should regulate corporations when necessary- and that's the point where we disagree. There are times when you see government involvement as necessary, and I probably wont.
 

No1

Retired.
Supporter
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
30,083
Reputation
4,736
Daps
67,030
I totally understand what you're saying when you stress that profit is the main objective of corporations, however, don't most corporations have some type of social responsibility or obligations to the community that they have written in their charter....

My point is, the workforce and the consumer(the people) or the main catalyst for all corporations and in essence, if unified, we can dictate their hiring practices and how they do business....

You're talking about corporate social responsibility and there are debates about whether a corporation whose sole goal is to maximize profit of the shareholders is the proper tool to bring about social objectives. Dodge's CEO once tried to invest more of the company's money into new technologies in order to create more fuel efficient vehicles and so that he could hire more people as well and be a benefit to the community. The shareholders didn't like it and filed a derivative suit against the board and it was ruled that maximizing profit was the main objective and one could not limit that at the expense of profit outside of shareholder approval.

So you're reading far too much into those charters. A corporation's goal is to make money, everything else is ancillary by a considerable margin.
 
Top