Doesn’t even look at the rim he’s fone
It’s more to it than raw numbers though as Ant had better numbers than Melo and he still didn’t win ROY. You have to look at the entire season of work instead of certain segments and both Mobley and Barnes deserved it over him.Up to the All Star Break, Cade was averaging more points, assists and steals than Scottie. He had a better 3 point and FT % too. And all this despite coming off an ankle injury to start the season.
The only reason why Melo won over Ant and why Mobley and Barnes won over Cade is because of team success, that's it.It’s more to it than raw numbers though as Ant had better numbers than Melo and he still didn’t win ROY. You have to look at the entire season of work instead of certain segments and both Mobley and Barnes deserved it over him.
That boy is just another Frank Ntilikina. The sooner Pistons fans come to terms with how bad he is instead of trying to lie and cope about how "good" he is defensively, the better.
The only reason why Melo won over Ant and why Mobley and Barnes won over Cade is because of team success, that's it.
They biased against Michigan as a whole if we're being honest, but that's a convo for a whole nother day....The media has its own bias towards Detroit. I remember Cade being considered a generational talent and next in line until the Pistons won the lottery, then the discourse changed
You do know that the Hornets didn't make the playoffs the year Melo won MVP right? If Ant was even average the first half of his rookie season then he would have won ROY over Lamelo. Dudes efficiency that first half of the season was straight ass.The only reason why Melo won over Ant and why Mobley and Barnes won over Cade is because of team success, that's it.
We all came to conclusion Killian was trash a while ago. We wish he was as good as Ntilikina. He is atleast an NBA role player. Killian does not belong in NBA periodThat boy is just another Frank Ntilikina. The sooner Pistons fans come to terms with how bad he is instead of trying to lie and cope about how "good" he is defensively, the better.
I disagree. The only reason the Hornets didn't make it was because they lost in the play-in tournament to the Pacers. The Timberwolves were never in the conversation for a playoff or a play-in that year. They finished near dead-last in the Western Conference standings. And Barnes and Mobley tend to play closer to the basket than Cade does, and have less responsibility when it comes to directing the offense, playmaking, etc. Of course they would have better efficiency ratings. The fact that they were as close as they were despite that fact is a testament to Cade.You do know that the Hornets didn't make the playoffs the year Melo won MVP right? If Ant was even average the first half of his rookie season then he would have won ROY over Lamelo. Dudes efficiency that first half of the season was straight ass.
Mobley and Barnes were more consistent their rookie season over Cade. Posters gotta stop being fooled over raw numbers as everyone is putting them up these days.
Ant was literally the worst defender at his position his rookie year and his assist to turnover ratio was laughable even with his 2nd half of the season performance. It’s those type of things that work against a player even with putting up good numbers. It’s exacrI disagree. The only reason the Hornets didn't make it was because they lost in the play-in tournament to the Pacers. The Timberwolves were never in the conversation for a playoff or a play-in that year. They finished near dead-last in the Western Conference standings. And Barnes and Mobley tend to play closer to the basket than Cade does, and have less responsibility when it comes to directing the offense, playmaking, etc. Of course they would have better efficiency ratings. The fact that they were as close as they were despite that fact is a testament to Cade.