Draymond Green Fires Back At Charles Barkley

The Devil's Advocate

Call me Dad
Joined
Jun 1, 2012
Messages
35,538
Reputation
7,664
Daps
98,593
Reppin
Better to reign in Hell than serve in Heaven
People rarely say that shyt about Marino because he's not a cocksucker.
they don't say it TO him.... but the FIRST thing that is brought up when you mention great qb's


"marino's one of the greatest, but he never won a ring, so we gotta knock him down"


being on all these nfl shows... talking about the games... sitting with shyttier players wearing the rings on tv with you.... and bringing up OTHER players who ain't got them... knowing they just being nice and not saying your name.... it's gotta sting
 

Gravity

Banned
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
18,826
Reputation
2,195
Daps
56,258
Forget his basketball opinions, it's telling that Gabriel Union is the only one I've heard call Barkley out for being a c00n.
 

L. Deezy

Veteran
Joined
May 25, 2012
Messages
37,636
Reputation
4,500
Daps
83,506
Green has done jack shyt in the NBA.. sometimes you just gotta listen and either ignore or prove yourself. Im saying this for these young dudes
 

Walt

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
May 2, 2012
Messages
11,162
Reputation
11,823
Daps
68,211
It's almost impossible to imagine the fukking stantastic gall (for Barkley or for your favorite team and therefore against anything Warrior-related) and obstinance is has to take for anyone to have an issue with Green here. He's having what almost any sane person affiliated with basketball would acknowledge as a personally great season, and he's on a team that has exceeded lofty expectations and evolved into the best team in the league so far in the season, and he's supposed to suffer lazy, personal attacks from Charles Barkley because in the 90s The Round c00n of Rebound was a better player than Green?

Charles Barkley is - and this is not hyperbole in my mind - one of the most worthless human beings on Earth relative to his prominence and platform. He is absolutely terrible at his job in every single imaginable way except being entertaining (and even in that regard, his entertainment is tied less to a dynamic, compelling personality than it is bottom-of-the-barrel minstrelsy). There is one thing in life he had a true talent for, and somehow he still can't produce any insights for his audience about the game of basketball. He recycles the same lazy, empty talking points about jumpshooting teams and size ad nauseam. He is often drunk while doing his job. He rarely seems to have paid close attention to the games he subsequently "analyzes," substituting "bold" opinions that run a very limited gamut from ad hominem attacks to jokes about cities and people who are ugly or fat or stupid. His opinions on players, strategies, and contenders betray a complete and utter lack of research, understanding, or even care for the topics. He is unprepared and ineffective at discussing basketball in any way that enlightens viewers. His only value is in generating "buzz" by feuding with current players, being "edgy" by speaking buffoonishly on social issues, or being an obese hybrid of Homer Simpson and an Amos 'n' Andy sketch who elicits guffaws from white Americans by virtue of being "so colorful."

He was my favorite player for most of my life, and it has been painful to have the cover peeled back to betray the Wizard of my personal basketball Oz is really just a jackass and degenerate who is so far removed from reality and decency that he might as well be a literal cartoon character, some morbid and horrific sort of outtake from Fat Albert who was lifted off the cutting room floor by a gust of wind and landed in hell, where Satan made him 3-dimensional and gave him a human's ability to speak, but a Cow's brain to process thought.

Not a single fukking player in the league should have any respect for Charles' opinions, work ethic (which was notoriously lacking as a player, and might even be worse as an analyst), moralizing, and certainly not his direct (and almost always unprovoked) attacks. I don't give a fukk how old or how accomplished anyone is, once he devolves into a complete doofus, hyprocrite, degenerate, and minstrel there's not a soul on Earth who should respect a fukking thing that comes out of his mouth, especially when it's inflammatory or defamatory.

fukk Charles Barkley. He's as close to a piece of shyt as a human can get. And his wife looks like a gigantic, crusty gym sock that was left balled up in a funky locker for 50 years. That he still has a job and is considered "entertaining" speaks to truths about this society that confirm my worst suspicions of it.
 

Brozay

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
62,793
Reputation
7,086
Daps
180,064
It's almost impossible to imagine the fukking stantastic gall (for Barkley or for your favorite team and therefore against anything Warrior-related) and obstinance is has to take for anyone to have an issue with Green here. He's having what almost any sane person affiliated with basketball would acknowledge as a personally great season, and he's on a team that has exceeded lofty expectations and evolved into the best team in the league so far in the season, and he's supposed to suffer lazy, personal attacks from Charles Barkley because in the 90s The Round c00n of Rebound was a better player than Green?

Charles Barkley is - and this is not hyperbole in my mind - one of the most worthless human beings on Earth relative to his prominence and platform. He is absolutely terrible at his job in every single imaginable way except being entertaining (and even in that regard, his entertainment is tied less to a dynamic, compelling personality than it is bottom-of-the-barrel minstrelsy). There is one thing in life he had a true talent for, and somehow he still can't produce any insights for his audience about the game of basketball. He recycles the same lazy, empty talking points about jumpshooting teams and size ad nauseam. He is often drunk while doing his job. He rarely seems to have paid close attention to the games he subsequently "analyzes," substituting "bold" opinions that run a very limited gamut from ad hominem attacks to jokes about cities and people who are ugly or fat or stupid. His opinions on players, strategies, and contenders betray a complete and utter lack of research, understanding, or even care for the topics. He is unprepared and ineffective at discussing basketball in any way that enlightens viewers. His only value is in generating "buzz" by feuding with current players, being "edgy" by speaking buffoonishly on social issues, or being an obese hybrid of Homer Simpson and an Amos 'n' Andy sketch who elicits guffaws from white Americans by virtue of being "so colorful."

He was my favorite player for most of my life, and it has been painful to have the cover peeled back to betray the Wizard of my personal basketball Oz is really just a jackass and degenerate who is so far removed from reality and decency that he might as well be a literal cartoon character, some morbid and horrific sort of outtake from Fat Albert who was lifted off the cutting room floor by a gust of wind and landed in hell. where Satan made him 3-dimensional and gave him a human's ability to speak, but a Cow's brain to process thought.

Not a single fukking player in the league should have any respect for Charles' opinions, work ethic (which was notoriously lacking as a player, and might even be worse as an analyst), moralizing, and certainly not his direct (and almost always unprovoked) attacks. I don't give a fukk how old or how accomplished anyone is, once he/she devolves into a complete doofus, hyprocrite, degenerate, and minstrel there's not a soul on Earth who should respect a fukking thing that comes out of his mouth, especially when it's inflammatory or defamatory.

fukk Charles Barkley. He's as close to a piece of shyt as a human can get. And his wife looks like a gigantic, crusty gym sock that was left balled up in a funky locker for 50 years. That he still has a job and is considered "entertaining" speak to truths about this society that confirm my worst suspicions about it.
Very well said, couldn't agree more across the board
 

Danie84

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
71,915
Reputation
13,156
Daps
130,712
I applaud the players who reminds the ringless bumpkin about his subpar contribution to the game:mjlol:
 

G.O.A.T Squad Spokesman

Logic Is Absent Wherever Hate Is Present
Joined
May 12, 2012
Messages
79,940
Reputation
5,705
Daps
234,981
It's almost impossible to imagine the fukking stantastic gall (for Barkley or for your favorite team and therefore against anything Warrior-related) and obstinance is has to take for anyone to have an issue with Green here. He's having what almost any sane person affiliated with basketball would acknowledge as a personally great season, and he's on a team that has exceeded lofty expectations and evolved into the best team in the league so far in the season, and he's supposed to suffer lazy, personal attacks from Charles Barkley because in the 90s The Round c00n of Rebound was a better player than Green?

Charles Barkley is - and this is not hyperbole in my mind - one of the most worthless human beings on Earth relative to his prominence and platform. He is absolutely terrible at his job in every single imaginable way except being entertaining (and even in that regard, his entertainment is tied less to a dynamic, compelling personality than it is bottom-of-the-barrel minstrelsy). There is one thing in life he had a true talent for, and somehow he still can't produce any insights for his audience about the game of basketball. He recycles the same lazy, empty talking points about jumpshooting teams and size ad nauseam. He is often drunk while doing his job. He rarely seems to have paid close attention to the games he subsequently "analyzes," substituting "bold" opinions that run a very limited gamut from ad hominem attacks to jokes about cities and people who are ugly or fat or stupid. His opinions on players, strategies, and contenders betray a complete and utter lack of research, understanding, or even care for the topics. He is unprepared and ineffective at discussing basketball in any way that enlightens viewers. His only value is in generating "buzz" by feuding with current players, being "edgy" by speaking bufoonishly on social issues, or being an obese hybrid of Homer Simpson and an Amos 'n' Andy sketch who elicits guffaws from white Americans by virtue of being "so colorful."

He was my favorite player for most of my life, and it has been painful to have the cover peeled back to betray the Wizard of my personal basketball Oz is really just a jackass and degenerate who is so far removed from reality and decency that he might as well be a literal cartoon character, some morbid and horrific sort of outtake from Fat Albert who was lifted off the cutting room floor by a gust of wind and landed in hell. where Satan made him 3-dimensional and gave him a human's ability to speak, but a Cow's brain to process thought.

Not a single fukking player in the league should have any respect for Charles' opinions, work ethic (which was notoriously lacking as a player, and might even be worse as an analyst), moralizing, and certainly not his direct (and almost always unprovoked) attacks. I don't give a fukk how old or how accomplished anyone is, once he devolves into a complete doofus, hyprocrite, degenerate, and minstrel there's not a soul on Earth who should respect a fukking thing that comes out of his mouth, especially when it's inflammatory or defamatory.

fukk Charles Barkley. He's as close to a piece of shyt as a human can get. And his wife looks like a gigantic, crusty gym sock that was left balled up in a funky locker for 50 years. That he still has a job and is considered "entertaining" speaks to truths about this society that confirm my worst suspicions of it.
:merchant::whew:
 

TheSpook

Banned
Joined
Sep 1, 2014
Messages
2,637
Reputation
-1,465
Daps
4,513
It's almost impossible to imagine the fukking stantastic gall (for Barkley or for your favorite team and therefore against anything Warrior-related) and obstinance is has to take for anyone to have an issue with Green here. He's having what almost any sane person affiliated with basketball would acknowledge as a personally great season, and he's on a team that has exceeded lofty expectations and evolved into the best team in the league so far in the season, and he's supposed to suffer lazy, personal attacks from Charles Barkley because in the 90s The Round c00n of Rebound was a better player than Green?

Charles Barkley is - and this is not hyperbole in my mind - one of the most worthless human beings on Earth relative to his prominence and platform. He is absolutely terrible at his job in every single imaginable way except being entertaining (and even in that regard, his entertainment is tied less to a dynamic, compelling personality than it is bottom-of-the-barrel minstrelsy). There is one thing in life he had a true talent for, and somehow he still can't produce any insights for his audience about the game of basketball. He recycles the same lazy, empty talking points about jumpshooting teams and size ad nauseam. He is often drunk while doing his job. He rarely seems to have paid close attention to the games he subsequently "analyzes," substituting "bold" opinions that run a very limited gamut from ad hominem attacks to jokes about cities and people who are ugly or fat or stupid. His opinions on players, strategies, and contenders betray a complete and utter lack of research, understanding, or even care for the topics. He is unprepared and ineffective at discussing basketball in any way that enlightens viewers. His only value is in generating "buzz" by feuding with current players, being "edgy" by speaking bufoonishly on social issues, or being an obese hybrid of Homer Simpson and an Amos 'n' Andy sketch who elicits guffaws from white Americans by virtue of being "so colorful."

He was my favorite player for most of my life, and it has been painful to have the cover peeled back to betray the Wizard of my personal basketball Oz is really just a jackass and degenerate who is so far removed from reality and decency that he might as well be a literal cartoon character, some morbid and horrific sort of outtake from Fat Albert who was lifted off the cutting room floor by a gust of wind and landed in hell. where Satan made him 3-dimensional and gave him a human's ability to speak, but a Cow's brain to process thought.

Not a single fukking player in the league should have any respect for Charles' opinions, work ethic (which was notoriously lacking as a player, and might even be worse as an analyst), moralizing, and certainly not his direct (and almost always unprovoked) attacks. I don't give a fukk how old or how accomplished anyone is, once he devolves into a complete doofus, hyprocrite, degenerate, and minstrel there's not a soul on Earth who should respect a fukking thing that comes out of his mouth, especially when it's inflammatory or defamatory.

fukk Charles Barkley. He's as close to a piece of shyt as a human can get. And his wife looks like a gigantic, crusty gym sock that was left balled up in a funky locker for 50 years. That he still has a job and is considered "entertaining" speaks to truths about this society that confirm my worst suspicions of it.
I know cats ride your dikk on here but you doing too much homie. shyt isn't that serious.
 

Real N Quotes

East Is In The House OMG
Joined
Jun 10, 2012
Messages
8,997
Reputation
-1,286
Daps
15,600
full
 

ahomeplateslugger

Superstar
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
7,886
Reputation
841
Daps
16,385
:wow:

barkley has been throwing shade at the warriors for a long time so i :salute:draymond for shytting on him. we gotta do whatever it takes to resign him now
 
Top