You are forgetting that there's two separate lawsuits. The second one is strictly about UMG allowing Kendrick to release a diss song to Drake with 'lies' on it, while neglecting that they let him do the exact same thing. It's like walking up to a man, punching him, he knocks you out and you call the police
I mean conflict of interest would always be a problem when two artists on the same label are beefing. Can Kendrick say the same shyt? That UMG devalued Kendricks brand by allowing damaging lyrics by Drake to him and pushing it.
Also, why would UMG want to damage one of their most prized assets? They make money when he does, if he generates less they generate less.
Even if Kendrick won the beef, Drake is still a bigger cash cow and bigger artist. He might have less stans, but more casuals.
Exactly I'm not pro label but UMG let both Drake and Kendrick say nasty things to each other without stepping in.
They let both rappers go to war
Last edited: