Hella fanned out nikkas in this post picking sides.Objectively speaking he has a case.
Both artists signed to the same label and Universal obviously put gas on Not Like Us. If you know anything about the music business, that means money is being spent. And if he removed a petition to actually sue so his team must feel he has evidence and a case.
To compare apples to apples, it wasn’t that long ago when Back to Back was a thing. Drake and Meek were on entirely different labels and the consensus was that Drake washed Meek. However, Back to Back was not being worked like a single in actual rotation. I’m not talking mixshow or satellite stations where B sides get played.
And to further prove when money is being spent and when it isn’t… look at how GNX came and went.
I get what your saying but If UMG does sue Kendrick like Drakes first petition stated they said they will do Kendrick should counter sue! fukk that. Also Kendrick can sue because that’s what a label is supposed to do. It’s their job to push a single for profit.
Now if they really pushed it in attempts to lower Drake stock because of contract negotiations that’s an issue but it’s a double edged sword
I’m starting to agree with what Andre3K said about this beef. Yes it was entertaining but toooo much money was involved between Drake, Kendrick, and UMG.
Idk man. This shyt is getting crazy and this will for sure be the last mainstream rap battle we might ever get