Dr Umar Johnson defends Diddy “Where’s the evidence for sex trafficking”

Why-Fi

gnap
Supporter
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
19,145
Reputation
2,694
Daps
26,678
Reppin
smurf village
not a dr umar hater but i dont understand what hes getting at. why does he need evidence, what is he going to do
 
Joined
Sep 15, 2015
Messages
24,653
Reputation
10,953
Daps
106,233
Reppin
Detroit
They dont care Umar,they think trumped up charges will never happen to them or people they know. I tried to tell the peanut gallery the same thing the other day. Quietly the European creates laws that can get a conviction on weak evidence,and the word of sketchy witnesses. All for the sole purposes to take down powerful people and fill their prisons. Meanwhile you got these crybabies yapping about Project 2025,not realizing what theyve been fear mongering about Project 2025,has already been taking place:mjlol:


But oh well enjoy the zoo within the zoo. Keep your nose clean and dont give them rope:respect:
No, just stop. We're not doing this in defense of Diddy. Yes, the system is rigged against Black men, particularly the ones who don’t have the wealth or resources to defend themselves. And that’s why we need to be careful about who we are defending and why. The criminal justice system disproportionately harms everyday Black men, not multimillionaires like Diddy who can afford top-tier legal teams. If we try to exploit that reality to argue that someone with the power and resources of someone like Diddy is a victim of it, then we weaken the real conversations that need to be had about everyday Black men getting locked up on flimsy evidence and minor charges. That's not to say that money shields you from some of those harms, but at least in the legal system, you can leverage those resources for a top-tier defense.

As for Project 2025, you're wrong. What's being proposed for the future hasn't taken place yet. Project 2025 is a whole different beast designed to reshape federal power in ways that could dismantle hard-fought protections for civil rights and voting rights, making things even worse. It's time to stop dismissing those concerns as just fearmongering.
 

Animal House

Superstar
Joined
May 28, 2012
Messages
16,949
Reputation
2,601
Daps
39,981
Reppin
NULL
Just asking, where is the evidence though? I understand y’all are answering “well it’s fukk diddy”, but how strong is that evidence
 
Joined
Aug 3, 2012
Messages
44,189
Reputation
-35,266
Daps
244,282
The Honorable Minister of Code Tariq Nasheed is also on his side.
full





Tariq too???? Diddy for sure coming home :blessed:
 

desjardins

Veteran
Joined
Nov 3, 2015
Messages
17,421
Reputation
1,297
Daps
64,925
Reppin
Mustard Island
Puffy and his legal team probably don't even know all the evidence the Feds have yet
Isn't that the purpose of discovery plus the fact the Feds continually bring in witnesses obtaining new evidence during this stage of a rico
Umar better be careful before they look into his donations grift and make that into a rico, that was across multiple states lines since he's based in Philadelphia, building the school in Delaware, and touring in multiple states :sas1:
 

CouldntBeMeTho

Chairman Meow
Supporter
Joined
Jul 14, 2012
Messages
48,771
Reputation
22,655
Daps
276,151
Reppin
Dog Shooting Squad Of Islamabad
That's what a trial is for umar lol. i tentatively agree tho. The indictment was almost all accusatuons with no actual evidence given, other than reference to cassie incident. It will be interesting to see who comes forward. Like if some male hookers come forward to testify
 

bl2k8

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
29,518
Reputation
3,908
Daps
104,714
Reppin
Northern California
If they were able to dig up the Cassie video you know damn well they got way more stuff :unimpressed: that was only released because it was “safe” for the public to see. Dude sound like a dumbass
 

Nigerianwonder

Superstar
Joined
May 20, 2012
Messages
7,050
Reputation
2,023
Daps
31,222
Reppin
NULL
fukk Diddy but it’s not a dumb question. If we're being honest here, everyone is wondering what exactly the charges are about.

I keep seeing diddy got arrested for guns, drugs, and whatever is on the tapes. Why we lee arguing with people who ignore that part and pretend he got arrested for freakoffs

This is the real issue. Everyone is talking about everything except what hew is actually being charged with. He has 3 charges. All 3 related to prostitution. Racketeering conspiracy, sex trafficking, and transportation of prostitutes. For the RICO they are saying diddy ran a criminal organization for sole the purposes of prostitution and distributing narcotics.

People mention arson, kidnapping, guns etc which are mentioned in the indictment.. But Diddy himself is not actually being charged with those things. They are saying he ran an organization that may have committed those acts to further the cause of prostitution and distributing narcotics. There is a reason why its worded that way. Cause diddy himself likely didnt do any of those things or they dont have evidence to tie him directly to it. If they did he would be charged for those things directly. But he only has 3 charges all related to sex tracking.

And there are not 100 of victims. Read the indictment. Page 11 explains count 2 which is the sex trafficking charge. It literally only references 1 victim who is making this accusation that they were trafficked. I'm not big on Dr Umar and this is not a defense of diddy. But if we are going to talk about it lets do it with facts and what the legal charges actually are and not emotions and gossip.
 

Savvir

Veteran
Joined
Oct 8, 2014
Messages
21,090
Reputation
3,556
Daps
109,284
Why do these people think the justice department has to submit evidence to them?

The case files will eventually become public. It's not in the interest of anybody for case files on an ongoing case to be made public before a fair trial is had
 

King_Kamala61

TheColi's Big Black Areolae Supremicist
Joined
Mar 11, 2022
Messages
18,813
Reputation
15,210
Daps
46,447
Reppin
Port City Louisiana Cooper Road
swear I keep seeing they have his tapes. I don’t know how this works but don’t they save all the hard hitting details for court?

It’s not like we found out Vince McMahon was shytting on people the first day of his problems. Details started to come out as time went on.

I keep seeing diddy got arrested for guns, drugs, and whatever is on the tapes. Why we lee arguing with people who ignore that part and pretend he got arrested for freakoffs
They told his Lawyers what they have on him. If his lawyers bail or he gets new lawyers...then that smell in Denmark is true
 

Bolzmark

Superstar
Joined
May 23, 2012
Messages
8,589
Reputation
1,352
Daps
28,306
Reppin
ATL
That's what a trial is for umar lol. i tentatively agree tho. The indictment was almost all accusatuons with no actual evidence given, other than reference to cassie incident. It will be interesting to see who comes forward. Like if some male hookers come forward to testify
The indictment is not for providing evidence. The purpose of the indictment is to apprise the defendant of what he is accused of. Puffs attorney will receive the evidence during the discovery process later on. Umar’s lack of understanding how the criminal justice system works is very apparent here.
 
Top