Donovan McNabb vs Michael Vick

Who would you pick as the better overall QB in their primes?

  • McNabb

    Votes: 69 78.4%
  • Vick

    Votes: 19 21.6%

  • Total voters
    88

GR13

Superstar
Joined
May 6, 2012
Messages
3,944
Reputation
2,329
Daps
28,689
Reppin
NULL
Mc5 for me obviously he's not as athletically gifted as Vick but Donovan is still a very athletically gifted in his on right and even though McNabb has flaws in his game he is still a
more skilled/polished QB then Vick

people forget how fast and how elusive a runner young Donovan was








amazing pocket escapability and great instinctual play making ability to find/locate receiver on the run/scramble







 
Last edited:

Voice of Reason

Veteran
Joined
Jan 7, 2016
Messages
44,053
Reputation
253
Daps
124,738
Mc5 for me obviously he's not as athletically gifted as Vick but Donovan is still a very athletically gifted in his on right and even though McNabb has flaws in his game he is still a
more skilled/polished QB then Vick

people forget how fast and how elusive a runner young Donovan was





amazing pocket escapability and great instinctual play making ability to find/locate receiver on the run/scramble





Now put up some Vick videos :mjgrin:
 

010101

C L O N E*0690//////
Joined
Jul 18, 2014
Messages
81,821
Reputation
18,638
Daps
220,509
Reppin
uptXwn***///***///
Now put up some Vick videos :mjgrin:
1JPqZmS.gif

this alone is enough

:mjgrin:

it'll never be done again

*
 

broller

Veteran
Joined
Jan 25, 2016
Messages
25,573
Reputation
2,415
Daps
73,293
Mc5 for me obviously he's not as athletically gifted as Vick but Donovan is still a very athletically gifted in his on right and even though McNabb has flaws in his game he is still a
more skilled/polished QB then Vick

people forget how fast and how elusive a runner young Donovan was





amazing pocket escapability and great instinctual play making ability to find/locate receiver on the run/scramble




:whew:

I remember this play on MNF



:wow:
 

broller

Veteran
Joined
Jan 25, 2016
Messages
25,573
Reputation
2,415
Daps
73,293
McNabb was the better passer and quarterback and was better for much longer.

In my mind, Vick had two good years (2002 and 2010). His 2010 was excellent though. I wish Vick had studied more, as well as played in this era where coaches are more open to building around talent rather than fitting talent around their rigid scheme. Maybe we'll see what Vick could have been with Lamar in Baltimore :wow:
 
Top