Don Cheadle To marveL Stans; “You fakkits need to watch more films outside the mcu”

[HellRell804]

You're missing my point. I'm not condoning addiction to any vices. But I can understand why people get hooked on them, because they are offering a somewhat new experience every time. Banging your sidechick in the back of your car is gonna be a diff experience from banging your wife on your honeymoon. Smoking an L in the park is gonna be a different experience than rolling on molly in the club.

Seeing Avengers 130 times is always going to be damn near the same experience. Ok maybe the first couple times you'll get some new things out of it, but 130? Sorry, that's insanity.

You know what? Now that I think about it, yes, I am recommending getting p*ssy over watching Avengers: Endgame. thecoli.com, the only place where watching Avengers 130 times is more normal than getting p*ssy.



I mean he's already showed his support. At a certain point there's such a thing as showing too much support. When even one of the stars of the movie is like "Whoa, take it easy, man", you know you got a problem.

We can def agree on the autism part.

Again, you're projecting your own values on other people. I've been smoking weed for almost 20 years now, never even thought about popping molly in the club or anywhere else. Other than switching from blunts to raw papers and the weed getting stronger, it's the same experience as when I was 14 and I'm cool with that.

Some people cheat, some stay faithful. Some are disgusted at the idea of free casual sex, some revel in it.

And lastly, if it's my job to sell my movies to fans, regardless of how I feel, I shouldn't disparage the customers.

What I really think is that Don is bitter of the fact that, of all his critically acclaimed movies, most people only know him as war machine.

 

[ThirdAct]

It's not about normal it's about least harm. Getting p*ssy can lead to a lot of unnecessary negative consequences. Seeing a movie 130 times not so much.

Of course watching the same movie 130 times in a row can lead to negative consequences. Tunnel vision? Motion sickness? A depleted bank account? Delusional fantasies? Homie prolly thinks he's Captain America in real life. Prolly leaving the theater talking about "Call me Steve Rogers from now on" and shyt.

Again, you're projecting your own values on other people. I've been smoking weed for almost 20 years now, never even thought about popping molly in the club or anywhere else. Other than switching from blunts to raw papers and the weed getting stronger, it's the same experience as when I was 14 and I'm cool with that.

Some people cheat, some stay faithful. Some are disgusted at the idea of free casual sex, some revel in it.

And lastly, if it's my job to sell my movies to fans, regardless of how I feel, I shouldn't disparage the customers.

What I really think is that Don is bitter of the fact that, of all his critically acclaimed movies, most people only know him as war machine.

I'm projecting my values on the guy cuz maybe he needs some values? He's watching the same movie over and over. I love movies, consider myself a cinephile and all that, but sorry, that's bizarre. Like get a new thing man. Avengers is over.

And I don't think Don's bitter. He's just telling dude to expand his horizons (and prolly a little concerned with dude's behavior). Nothing wrong with that.

 

[STAN JONES]

What type of loser do you have to be to go see the same movie 130 times

 

[HellRell804]

Of course watching the same movie 130 times in a row can lead to negative consequences. Tunnel vision? Motion sickness? Delusional fantasies? Homie prolly thinks he's Captain America in real life. Prolly leaving the theater talking about "Call me Steve Rogers from now on" and shyt.



I'm projecting my values on the guy cuz maybe he needs some values? He's watching the same movie over and over. I love movies, consider myself a cinephile and all that, but sorry, that's bizarre. Like get a new thing man. Avengers is over.

And I don't think Don's bitter. He's just telling dude to expand his horizons (and prolly a little concerned with dude's behavio). Nothing wrong with that.

Take a step back and realize how self righteous you're coming off as. Like who made you the authority on how people should spend their free time.

You just suggested that dude should start having random sex, exposing him to all kinds of health issues and diseases.

You, that's suggesting popping molly when you get bored of smoking blunts.

Like what works for you works for you, to me it sounds like you have dopamine addiction and escalation issues. But if it works for you so be it. Don't act like your way is the only acceptable way. Let that man watch avengers in peace.

 

[obarth]

nikkas really be taking @Still FloW seriously? Dude cracks me up by taking the Marvel stan formula and cranking that shyt up to 100. Perfect parody

I'm sorry, but this shyt is hilarious. When an actor in a film you decided to see 130 times tells you to chill, you know you've got problems

And @comparing wanting to see the original version of a film whose director's vision you were a fan of, being compared to seeing a movie 130 times in the span of a couple months. I'd call that Reed Richard's levels of stretching but stans would take that as a compliment now that Marvel got the rights backPeople still talk about wanting to see what Kubrick's final version of Eye's Wide Shut would be like and that came out in 1999. No, before one of you simple nikkas says it, I'm not comparing Kubrick and Snyder as directorsPopular opinion is that the director's cuts of both Watchmen and Batman vs. Superman are superior to what was shown in theaters, so someone wanting to see what Snyder's version of Justice League would have looked like is not outlandish.

These comic book movie roles can definitely be a blessing and a curse. Chris Evans and Chris Hemsworth were middling actors at best who now have iconic(I guess) roles under their belts. They also will more than likely never see a fraction of this success ever again. I won't relegate them to Hayden Christensen levels but Hollywood isn't going to be knocking down the door to cast these guys as leading men. This series revived RDJ's career, but he made Ironman popular, not the other way around. He was a respected actor long before these films and will stay that way after. shyt, Zodiac(which Mark Ruffalo happened to also be in) is better than anything the MCU ever made. He managed to star in another franchise in the midst of the MCU (Sherlock Holmes) while being the best part in a classic comedy (Tropic Thunder). The MCU helped his pockets, but RDJ was always gonna be a star. Inversely, his run as Superman may very well have already seriously hampered Henry Cavill's career. These films are a crapshoot as far as what they can do to your reputation.

 

[Saysumthinfunnymike]

Breh got the time and disposable income to go to see a 3 hour movie 130 times in 3 months at 10 to 15 bucks a pop. I think he's doing something right.

Whether or not he could be using that time and money more productively is completely subjective

Nah breh... I can go spend $200 on Js and some will be like what the fukk for? But this is an unhealthy way to live life, being a stan like this of anything is unhealthy it displays obsessive compulsive disorder

 

[Still FloW]

nikkas really be taking @Still FloW seriously? Dude cracks me up by taking the Marvel stan formula and cranking that shyt up to 100. Perfect parody

I'm sorry, but this shyt is hilarious. When an actor in a film you decided to see 130 times tells you to chill, you know you've got problems

And @comparing wanting to see the original version of a film whose director's vision you were a fan of, being compared to seeing a movie 130 times in the span of a couple months. I'd call that Reed Richard's levels of stretching but stans would take that as a compliment now that Marvel got the rights backPeople still talk about wanting to see what Kubrick's final version of Eye's Wide Shut would be like and that came out in 1999. No, before one of you simple nikkas says it, I'm not comparing Kubrick and Snyder as directorsPopular opinion is that the director's cuts of both Watchmen and Batman vs. Superman are superior to what was shown in theaters, so someone wanting to see what Snyder's version of Justice League would have looked like is not outlandish.

These comic book movie roles can definitely be a blessing and a curse. Chris Evans and Chris Hemsworth were middling actors at best who now have iconic(I guess) roles under their belts. They also will more than likely never see a fraction of this success ever again. I won't relegate them to Hayden Christensen levels but Hollywood isn't going to be knocking down the door to cast these guys as leading men. This series revived RDJ's career, but he made Ironman popular, not the other way around. He was a respected actor long before these films and will stay that way after. shyt, Zodiac(which Mark Ruffalo happened to also be in) is better than anything the MCU ever made. He managed to star in another franchise in the midst of the MCU (Sherlock Holmes) while being the best part in a classic comedy (Tropic Thunder). The MCU helped his pockets, but RDJ was always gonna be a star. Inversely, his run as Superman may very well have already seriously hampered Henry Cavill's career. These films are a crapshoot as far as what they can do to your reputation.

someone gets it

these stans revel in their own shyt but when its put on display they start copping pleas

got nikkas comparing a full directors vision to watching some bullshyt 130 times.. lmaoooooooooooooooo

the fuccery

 

[Triggamatic]

Marvelites are serious boy

 

[MenacingMonk]

He may be a loser, but at least he’s not a fukkboy loser going on a mass shooting spree.

 

[AnonymityX1000]

Of course watching the same movie 130 times in a row can lead to negative consequences. Tunnel vision? Motion sickness? A depleted bank account? Delusional fantasies? Homie prolly thinks he's Captain America in real life. Prolly leaving the theater talking about "Call me Steve Rogers from now on" and shyt.



I'm projecting my values on the guy cuz maybe he needs some values? He's watching the same movie over and over. I love movies, consider myself a cinephile and all that, but sorry, that's bizarre. Like get a new thing man. Avengers is over.

And I don't think Don's bitter. He's just telling dude to expand his horizons (and prolly a little concerned with dude's behavior). Nothing wrong with that.

Compared those to an unwanted child, herpes, an unwanted child, HIV? Just stop, you're not making any sense.

 

[HDiron]

Does the “round/view 130” mean that person has watched the movie 130 times?

 

[AnonymityX1000]

nikkas really be taking @Still FloW seriously? Dude cracks me up by taking the Marvel stan formula and cranking that shyt up to 100. Perfect parody

I'm sorry, but this shyt is hilarious. When an actor in a film you decided to see 130 times tells you to chill, you know you've got problems

And @comparing wanting to see the original version of a film whose director's vision you were a fan of, being compared to seeing a movie 130 times in the span of a couple months. I'd call that Reed Richard's levels of stretching but stans would take that as a compliment now that Marvel got the rights backPeople still talk about wanting to see what Kubrick's final version of Eye's Wide Shut would be like and that came out in 1999. No, before one of you simple nikkas says it, I'm not comparing Kubrick and Snyder as directorsPopular opinion is that the director's cuts of both Watchmen and Batman vs. Superman are superior to what was shown in theaters, so someone wanting to see what Snyder's version of Justice League would have looked like is not outlandish.

These comic book movie roles can definitely be a blessing and a curse. Chris Evans and Chris Hemsworth were middling actors at best who now have iconic(I guess) roles under their belts. They also will more than likely never see a fraction of this success ever again. I won't relegate them to Hayden Christensen levels but Hollywood isn't going to be knocking down the door to cast these guys as leading men. This series revived RDJ's career, but he made Ironman popular, not the other way around. He was a respected actor long before these films and will stay that way after. shyt, Zodiac(which Mark Ruffalo happened to also be in) is better than anything the MCU ever made. He managed to star in another franchise in the midst of the MCU (Sherlock Holmes) while being the best part in a classic comedy (Tropic Thunder). The MCU helped his pockets, but RDJ was always gonna be a star. Inversely, his run as Superman may very well have already seriously hampered Henry Cavill's career. These films are a crapshoot as far as what they can do to your reputation.

He is nowhere near the Marvel Stan formula, he's dead serious. Go check his meltdown in the BvS thread when the reviews came out. Marvel Stan's really don't go the insulting people/family members route for laughs. That is wholly a DC Stan thing. DC Stans have gotten banned for that while the Marvel massive is all present and accounted for.
And wanting to see the directors cut is one thing but cursing executives and asking them to forget profits for art uh when profits is their main job is how do I say . . . not too bright seeing where the DC movie brand is now.

 

[Kiyoshi-Dono]

You found @Bryan Danielson ’s twitter?

 

[Still FloW]

He may be a loser, but at least he’s not a fukkboy loser going on a mass shooting spree.

he's a cracca... could be both

 

[OmegaK2099]