Does this story prove where white people come from?

[Blackking]

You are the same person who said that this broad looks black :

Funny shyt about it is she aint even 100% Indian, she's half white. This is proof that some people will just stretch the physical definitions of "blackness" to suit whatever agenda it is they are trying to push. It's delusional.

And we are talking about India, so why would you bring up other parts of Asia? It doesn't even matter because Afro-Asiatic languages are based mainly around the horn of Africa and the M.E. Asian languages are completely different.

As far as what ancient Indians looked like, it depends how far back you want to go. If you go back far enough everybody on the planet looked similar, which makes these debates pointless since we are all human beings.

If you are going to sit there and insist that all Indians used to look like the Andamanese negritos before "mixing" then you are going to have to tell us when this mixing occured, who they mixed with, and how India came to be a land of a BILLION people who have straight/wavy hair and light-dark brown skin and "caucasoid" features. You can't post garbage and then tell me to go to a "library" to qualify your bullshyt

lol, 10 post and you haven't made any points... then occasionally tried to take cheap shots.

I haven't returned your cheap shots because I know I'm correct.. It's not like I'm making this shyt up...

Instead of counterpointing, u ask me to further explain a point. Also, I never said that chick was black. I said I didn't even know she was Indian, but I thought she was mixed w black or Asian or something. But you don't understand that it is irrelevant what I think or what you think someone 'looks' like... point is.. 6k year ago all Indians were darker and more african than both me and you... To make the case that indians weren't black you will have to be speaking on very recent history.

i say go to a library so that you can take look at migration patterns.. and then so that you can not be ignorant on these 'asian' features and where they originated.

 

[Blackking]

who gives a fukk about any of this shyt? this is one of the dumbest threads I've ever seen in HL.

get in the truck. He reps higher caste so you know how that is when speak on all this... his soul can't help it.

 

[Sensitive Blake Griffin]

Serious question, why do you consider this dumb, and why shouldn't anybody care about where people potentially come from? Does modern science not cosign some of these points? Or would you say its up for interpretation?

No one is using science in this thread... we have people in here who clearly have no idea what the fukk albinism is, nor do they have any knowledge of how the evolution of skin color is related to early homo-sapiens migrating away from the tropics to the north where there is less sunlight. Now people are just arguing whether ancient indian peoples were "black". We know where "people" come from. The human race started in modern day africa and migrated from there. And we also know why skin color changes.

 

[Blackking]

No one is using science in this thread... we have people in here who clearly have no idea what the fukk albinism is, nor do they have any knowledge of how the evolution of skin color is related to early homo-sapiens migrating away from the tropics to the north where there is less sunlight. Now people are just arguing whether ancient indian peoples were "black". We know where "people" come from. The human race started in modern day africa and migrated from there. And we also know why skin color changes.

Everyone knows what albinism is. Plus the research is there on that.

and the evolution of skin color didn't happen because of a move away from the tropics.

and do you have science to say ancient indian people were black ... some posters will listen to you more readily because your Caucasian.

 

[Sensitive Blake Griffin]

Everyone knows what albinism is. Plus the research is there on that.

and the evolution of skin color didn't happen because of a move away from the tropics.

and do you have science to say ancient indian people were black ... some posters will listen to you more readily because your Caucasian.

this is the leading scientific hypothesis

1. From about 1.2 million years ago to less than 100,000 years ago, archaic humans, including archaic Homo sapiens, were dark-skinned.
2. As Homo sapiens populations began to migrate, the evolutionary constraint keeping skin dark decreased proportionally to the distance north a population migrated, resulting in a range of skin tones within northern populations.
3. At some point, some northern populations experienced positive selection for lighter skin due to the increased production of vitamin D from sunlight and the genes for darker skin disappeared from these populations.
4. Subsequent migrations into different UV environments and admixture between populations has resulted in the varied range of skin pigmentations we see today.

Sounds COMPLETELY LOGICAL. No one else in this thread has offered any other explanation to why skin color changed.​

 

[observe]

The original people of India were black..here's the oldest figurine from the Indus Valley civilization

Clearly a black woman

 

[observe]

Here goes some people of India

 

[NvrCMyNut]

Original man/woman talk just reeks of desperation, like a NY hip hop head telling everyone hiphop started in NY. White's turned up last, were the spawn of the devil, never had an original thought or invention etc etc...and still took over the whole planet.

 

[observe]

this is the leading scientific hypothesis

1. From about 1.2 million years ago to less than 100,000 years ago, archaic humans, including archaic Homo sapiens, were dark-skinned.
2. As Homo sapiens populations began to migrate, the evolutionary constraint keeping skin dark decreased proportionally to the distance north a population migrated, resulting in a range of skin tones within northern populations.
3. At some point, some northern populations experienced positive selection for lighter skin due to the increased production of vitamin D from sunlight and the genes for darker skin disappeared from these populations.
4. Subsequent migrations into different UV environments and admixture between populations has resulted in the varied range of skin pigmentations we see today.

Sounds COMPLETELY LOGICAL. No one else in this thread has offered any other explanation to why skin color changed.​

The original Black settlers of Europe TURNED WHITE because they became FARMERS, who ate only farm produce devoid of Vitamin D. And, the lessened solar duration and intensity in the Northern regions REQUIRED a Whiting of the skin for faster absorption of UV radiation and production of Vitamin D. So then, White skin absorbs Sunlight FASTER? Lets see.

1) Modern Whites in Europe are Germanics, Slavs, and Turks. They have nothing to do with ancient ANYBODY in Europe. They are migrants from Central Asia in the CURRENT era. Any encyclopedia will document their entry into Europe.

2) These Whites in Central Asia were Nomads - NOT FARMERS! Their diet was rich in Meats and FISH! Plus they had plenty of Sunshine - in Kazakhstan-south, for eight months of the year, the average UV intensity is level 8 out of a maximum 11. Thus there was no reason to turn White there!

3) Whites did NOT bring agriculture to Europe, Blacks from the South did, and they did NOT turn White.

4) European Whites in the early current era were NOT farmers - Farming is very RECENT to European Whites!.

5) The Whitest of the Whites in Europe - the Germans, inhabited Costal WESTERN Europe and Scotland - regions rich in fish and game animals - ancient Germany and modern Germany are different areas.

The Roman historian Cornelius Tacitus (56-118 A.D.) said this about them: For my own part, I agree with those who think that the tribes of Germany are free from all taint of intermarriages with foreign nations, and that they appear as a distinct, unmixed race, like none but themselves. Hence, too, the same physical peculiarities throughout so vast a population. All have fierce blue eyes, red hair, huge frames, fit only for a sudden exertion. They are less able to bear laborious work. Heat and thirst they cannot in the least endure; to cold and hunger their climate and their soil inure them. Does THAT sound like FARMERS?

During the time of Tacitus, Germans inhabited Caledonia (Scotland), the rest of Britain was inhabited by Blacks, they were the original settlers of Britain, and STILL BLACK! Tacitus describes them thusly: "The DARK complexion of the Silures, their usually curly hair, and the fact that Spain is the opposite shore to them, are an evidence that Iberians of a former date crossed over and occupied these parts. Those who are nearest to the Gauls are also like them, either from the permanent influence of original descent, or, because in countries which run out so far to meet each other, climate has produced similar physical qualities."

See more on Britain and the Germans here: Click >>>
6) A Human being requires ONLY 15 minutes of Sunshine, on face or hands, TWICE a week, for good health! Thus no reason for Black people to turn White.

But for the sake of argument, lets accept this bit of White myth, that Blacks TURNED White because of Vitamin D deficiency - Lets test it. Think of the absurdity of this: Black humans survived in Europe for about 35,000 years, then all of a sudden, their bodies were not getting enough vitamin "D": forcing them to lighten their skin. The problem is: logically, BEFORE there could be any evolutionary movement toward lighter skin - the population would have DIED OUT from Rickets!

Rickets

Rickets is a softening of bones in children due to deficiency or impaired metabolism of vitamin D, phosphorus or calcium, potentially leading to fractures and deformity. The Roman physician Soranus reported deformation of the bones in infants as early as the first and second centuries AD. He attributed these deformities as resulting from the failure of Roman mothers to properly nurture and clean their children, but didn't directly implicate poor diet in the condition. Rickets wasn't defined as a specific medical condition until 1645, when an Englishman named Daniel Whistler gave the earliest known description of the disease while still studying medicine.

Rickets was very common in industrialized cities around the turn of the twentieth century, both in the United States and in Europe. It was most common among the poorer, less privileged people and often affected infants. Still, there was not a complete understanding that the condition was caused by poor nutrition, although it was considered a potential cause, along with lack of fresh air and sunshine. In the late nineteenth century, strides had been made toward finding a cure for rickets. At the London Zoo in 1889, lion cubs were fed a diet of boneless lean meat. When some cubs developed florid rickets, they were treated by the addition of cod liver oil and crushed bones to their meals, and made a full recovery.

What causes rickets? Regardless of the type of rickets, the cause is always either due to a deficiency of vitamin D, calcium, or phosphate. Three common causes of rickets include nutritional rickets, hypophosphatemic rickets, and renal rickets.

So to carry the absurdity to it's logical conclusion: supposing that these Black people turning White, survived thousands of years of Rickets - in a non-deformed state, and then appeared as modern Whites. Then why would MODERN Whites STILL get Rickets? Wasn't the whole point of this MYTHICAL Evolution to develop White skin, just for the "SUPPOSED" reason that Sunlight could be quickly and efficiently absorbed by the White skin, just to AVOID such things?

One more laugh:

MONTREAL -- Rickets, a bone-wrenching childhood condition that virtually disappeared from Canada more than a generation ago, is making an alarming comeback, warns the Canadian Paediatric Society. At least 84 children - a number described as the "tip of the iceberg" - have been diagnosed in the past two years with rickets, according to data released yesterday. Ironically, the upsurge in cases is due principally to two health-promoting measures: breastfeeding; and sun screen, which interferes with the formation of vitamin D. Rickets is caused by vitamin D deficiency and breast milk is rich in many nutrients, but not vitamin D. This report goes on to mention Black children - Black children use SUN SCREEN?

 

[Blackking]

 

[GetInTheTruck]

lol, 10 post and you haven't made any points... then occasionally tried to take cheap shots.

I haven't returned your cheap shots because I know I'm correct.. It's not like I'm making this shyt up...

Instead of counterpointing, u ask me to further explain a point. Also, I never said that chick was black. I said I didn't even know she was Indian, but I thought she was mixed w black or Asian or something. But you don't understand that it is irrelevant what I think or what you think someone 'looks' like... point is.. 6k year ago all Indians were darker and more african than both me and you... To make the case that indians weren't black you will have to be speaking on very recent history.

i say go to a library so that you can take look at migration patterns.. and then so that you can not be ignorant on these 'asian' features and where they originated.

The fact that you thought that chick looks more black than she does Indian speaks volumes about the quality of your perception, and that was my point.

You brought up the Andamanese, I said that they are a group of people who have existed separate from the rest of the Indian population for years and speak an entirely different language. You say that 6k years ago all Indians looked like that, I ask you to back up your claim, and you tell me to go to a library. LOL, right.

 

[Blackking]

We have one side arguing COMPLETELY OUTDATED AND DISPROVED ideas about skin evolution, human migration, agriculture, culture, and biology..... then saying you "black muthafucaks don't know what the hell you're talking about."

i just can't anymore.. I'm glad a couple of yall came in.

 

[Blackking]

The fact that you thought that chick looks more black than she does Indian speaks volumes about the quality of your perception, and that was my point.

You brought up the Andamanese, I said that they are a group of people who have existed separate from the rest of the Indian population for years and speak an entirely different language. You say that 6k years ago all Indians looked like that, I ask you to back up your claim, and you tell me to go to a library. LOL, right.

Andamanese were brought up because this is what the nation of India would look like today if it weren't for a few interactions.

I didn't say this queen looked More black than indian.. i just figured she was some mix, but i did think she had some black in her just because she resembles my BM and people i know..
basically identical to my first bm whos is clearly black n hispanic - so u can't blame my perception if i've nutted up in a few hispanic chicks that resembled her..... But really it's irrelevant to the real discussion. She looks and acts sexy to me.

 

[Uncle Kingpin]

The caucazoidial mountain man , commonly nomenclatured as Cracker, Whitey, or as i-self-lord and master proclivate to referentiate- White Devil, came from their father Satan. The noble asiatic black man-god's geneticous supremacy was grafted into these recessivist neanderthalic White Devils on the island of Patmos by Yakub the big headed scientist.

 

[GetInTheTruck]

Andamanese were brought up because this is what the nation of India would look like today if it weren't for a few interactions.

What few interactions? be specific. How did the Andamanese turn into the 1 billion Indians we see today? At appox. what time period in human history did this happen?