Does the coli still believe planes brought down the towers on 9/11?

Dafunkdoc_Unlimited

Theological Noncognitivist Since Birth
Joined
Jul 25, 2012
Messages
44,624
Reputation
8,084
Daps
121,485
Reppin
The Wrong Side of the Tracks
Jahbarri said:
LOL your definitely an agent.

Meaningless assertion.
Jahbarri said:
therefore it’s impossible for building 7 to fall completely in 7 seconds.

I never said building 7 fell completely in 7 seconds.......are you being sarcastic?

Also, funny thing about Newton's Law, it applies to explosive forces and pretty-much rules out any form of explosive demolition scenario since any explosive powerful enough to break/shatter steel columns would also produce a resulting sound of about 130-150 decibels up to a mile away.

No such sound was recorded.​
 

Jahbarri

Banned
Joined
Mar 3, 2015
Messages
8,086
Reputation
-1,752
Daps
15,348
Reppin
MONTREAL
Meaningless assertion.


I never said building 7 fell completely in 7 seconds.......are you being sarcastic?

Also, funny thing about Newton's Law, it applies to explosive forces and pretty-much rules out any form of explosive demolition scenario since any explosive powerful enough to break/shatter steel columns would also produce a resulting sound of about 130-150 decibels up to a mile away.

No such sound was recorded.​
Blocked agent
 

Dafunkdoc_Unlimited

Theological Noncognitivist Since Birth
Joined
Jul 25, 2012
Messages
44,624
Reputation
8,084
Daps
121,485
Reppin
The Wrong Side of the Tracks
Jahbarri said:
LOL u do know u can have steel beams engulfed to 700 degrees (hotter then jetfuel burning) FOREVER and it still won’t bend a steel beam whatsoever.. stop talking out your ass

Absolutely false.........​



**TIME-STAMPED 7:50**

Video shows a bunch of dudes heating a section of railroad track over an open fire then bending it around a tree.​
 

Box Factory

hater
Joined
May 14, 2014
Messages
20,926
Reputation
-424
Daps
53,136
Reppin
#byrdgang
LOL u do know u can have steel beams engulfed to 700 degrees (hotter then jetfuel burning) FOREVER and it still won’t bend a steel beam whatsoever.. stop talking out your ass
Jet fuel burns at 800 to 1500 degrees

What are you talking about?

Honestly, judging by your spelling and continued misinterpretation of everything you read, you come off as either retarded or one of those surprising levels of stupid you don't see too often
 

Jahbarri

Banned
Joined
Mar 3, 2015
Messages
8,086
Reputation
-1,752
Daps
15,348
Reppin
MONTREAL
Jet fuel burns at 800 to 1500 degrees

What are you talking about?

Honestly, judging by your spelling and continued misinterpretation of everything you read, you come off as either retarded or one of those surprising levels of stupid you don't see too often
Shut up fool regardless how it comes out I’m speaking facts eat a dikk weirdo
 

Dafunkdoc_Unlimited

Theological Noncognitivist Since Birth
Joined
Jul 25, 2012
Messages
44,624
Reputation
8,084
Daps
121,485
Reppin
The Wrong Side of the Tracks
Always funny to me when a so-called "Truther" gets caught in a bold-faced LIE......

https://www.thecoli.com/posts/31012906/
Dafunkdoc_Unlimited said:
Due to the thermal elongations coupled with reductions in steel strength and stiffness that occur at elevated temperatures, even minor member end restraint, imperfections, crookedness, or force eccentricity can initiate visible local flange and/or web buckling, or overall member buckling, above about 600 °F (315 °C). With complete restrain from thermal expansion, these may occur at temperatures as low as 250 °F (120 °C). Buckling is very likely to occur at temperatures in the 1,200 to 1,400 °F (650 to 760 °C) range, when the strength and stiffness are less than 50 percent of their nominal ambient values. Past experience from flame curving and straightening indicates that local buckling often can occur quite suddenly at, and above, this temperature range.

In addition to these buckling distortions of the member, the steel will experience increasing end rotation and vertical deflections during the fire from the existing dead and live loads. Under fire conditions, both for uncontrolled natural exposures and in standard tests, the temperature-induced deflections of fire-resistive steel beam/concrete floor systems can be large. Actual fires have produced deflections ranging from several inches up to, in extreme cases, 3 to 4 ft, which are an order of magnitude greater than the normal serviceability limits that are anticipated for buildings. In this sense, it must be remembered that the intended structural outcome of fire safety design is to maintain building integrity and prevent (or delay) catastrophic collapse, despite suffering potentially extensive structural and nonstructural damage. Thus, even rated fire-resistive construction will often experience major structural and nonstructural damage during a severe fire.

You ever notice all they do is ask questions but NEVER answer them?​
 
Top