Does the coli still believe planes brought down the towers on 9/11?

[xCivicx]

okay my point is

the people who made those calls are dead
. its document that their families are now living without the person allegedly made the calls. how do u explain that. flight 93 especially

The story that makes the most sense to me is that they were taken to a military base and forced to make the calls from there

If you look at the flight paths of the planes on that day, 2 of the planes actually "crossed paths" over(aka landed at) a military base.

I'll post some info on that when I get home of I can still find it

 

[OJ Simpsom]

 

[Hannibal Fox]

@Hannibal Fox also, I'm not sure what you mean when you say "some of it sounds plausible"?

None of those videos pose any hypotheticals about anything at all

They just explain what government officials were doing on 9/11 and how they moved after

Like I said before, I'd respect your opinion more if you just said you dont wanna watch them because facts and truth arent that important to your personal world view

Ok, so let's just say it was an inside job, you have all this evidence, and your gonna do what with it?

Are any of you gonna go to the families that lost relatives in the tragedy and present the evidence or nah?

You gonna use the justice system or are you gonna just gaffle, and claim you can't because of the powers that be?

Hold up is any of this information yours?

Sidenote:

Miss me with the teacher spiel, my teachers were Van Sertima, Barashango, Obenga etc

Who are you exactly, and is the information

 

[chineebai]

Through most bs was that the wtc7 just collapsed for no apparent reason

 

[Exit9NJturnpike]

WTC 7 can't be explained

 

[chineebai]

Can someone explain how the terrorist were Saudi and Osama is Afghani but we went after Iraq?

 

[OJ Simpsom]

WTC 7 can't be explained

You never seen a controlled demolition before?

 

[AlainLocke]

Can someone explain how the terrorist were Saudi and Osama is Afghani but we went after Iraq?

Because the USA wants to surround Iran...

So you take out Iraq and Afghanistan, you have Egypt as a non aggressor, Saudi Arabia an ally, Kuwait and etc are out

The USA was taking out Iraq regardless

 

[OJ Simpsom]

Can someone explain how the terrorist were Saudi and Osama is Afghani but we went after Iraq?

This documentary explains EVERYTHING.

 

[Lord Bison]

So y'all honestly believe the WTC is armed with bombs on each floor ready to be detonated at anytime for an emergency.

Yes. Any nikka who watched Die Hard back in the day will tell you that

 

[Dafunkdoc_Unlimited]

still though im watching these fukkin towers come down....exactly the same way...WHY did they fall? the jet fuel burned up in 5 seconds, and its just a hole in the top. the towers were designed to withstand this

the fact that they were filled with 400 tons of asbestos, and were a huge liability, and that piece of fukking shyt larry silverstein and his whole family weren't at the towers that day

It wasn't 'just a hole in the top'. When those planes crashed into the buildings, they severed several of the supports that held the exterior walls as well as crashing into the central support columns and destroying several inches of flame retardant insulation around each of them. That was followed by the buildings burning, uncontrolled, for nearly an hour, which further weakened the supports that were already under more stress than they were designed to withstand since a portion of the support system (the exterior walls) had been destroyed. A CONVENTIONALLY built skyscraper would probably not have collapsed, but since the towers were built differently, comparing the stresses that wouldn't cause this to a conventional building is an invalid argument. The jet fuel also didn't burn up in 5 seconds. It flooded down chases like stairwells and elevator shafts and allowed fires to spread from the initial point of impact to other combustible materials throughout the buildings.....which is the cause of the sounds of 'explosions' people reported in interviews after the events.

The buildings did not fall in the 'exact same way' as a controlled demolition. Nor did they fall 'into their own footprint'. Nor did they fall at 'free-fall speed'. All those claims have been debunked by Popular Mechanics as well as structural/Civil/mechanical & explosives engineers worldwide. Sure, some doubt the 'official' story, but that doesn't mean that the 'official' story is false. Also, those who doubt it have much less evidence to support their version of events. Matter of fact, the vast majority of their arguments stem from conjecture rather than evidence.

Larry Silverstein is a 'red herring' for conspiracy theorists as well as certain offices located in the buildings. Lots of people weren't in the buildings that day. Does that mean they, too, were part of the conspiracy?

Bottom-line: Claiming the event was orchestrated by our own government assumes those who dislike our country aren't resourceful or intelligent enough to pull it off under their own power.
​

 

[Mike Nasty]

Can someone explain how the terrorist were Saudi and Osama is Afghani but we went after Iraq?

Not know where Osama Bin Laden is from but know the whole thing is staged brehs.

 

[xCivicx]

Ok, so let's just say it was an inside job, you have all this evidence, and your gonna do what with it?

Are any of you gonna go to the families that lost relatives in the tragedy and present the evidence or nah?

You gonna use the justice system or are you gonna just gaffle, and claim you can't because of the powers that be?

Hold up is any of this information yours?

Sidenote:

Miss me with the teacher spiel, my teachers were Van Sertima, Barashango, Obenga etc

Who are you exactly, and is the information

Please stop quoting me until you at least watch that 1 clip I asked you to watch

I think I've been pretty cordial so far, do me that 1 favor

 

[xCivicx]

The WTC towers were specifically built to withstand plane impacts

They had a mesh steel beam support system on the outer walls of the both towers, which distributed the weight of said towers evenly and pretty much eliminated points of complete failure in both structures

And if you look at the original fraudulent NIST model of the collapse, you'll see that the official video is cut short before the buildings collapse.

The video was cut because in the extended video of the model of the building collapse, the mesh steel beam support structure actually STAYS IN TACT, as the floors fall downward, meaning according to their own model, complete structural failure should not have occurred

The buildings exploded and disintegrated so completely that many first responders got cancer and died with almost evenly-distributed amounts of the building materials in their lungs

A building collapsing due to structural failure wouldn't obliterate said building materials so completely that the particles are small enough for one to breathe in

Anyone that tells you otherwise is deliberately trying to keep you stupid

 

[DPresidential]

It wasn't 'just a hole in the top'. When those planes crashed into the buildings, they severed several of the supports that held the exterior walls as well as crashing into the central support columns and destroying several inches of flame retardant insulation around each of them. That was followed by the buildings burning, uncontrolled, for nearly an hour, which further weakened the supports that were already under more stress than they were designed to withstand since a portion of the support system (the exterior walls) had been destroyed. A CONVENTIONALLY built skyscraper would probably not have collapsed, but since the towers were built differently, comparing the stresses that wouldn't cause this to a conventional building is an invalid argument. The jet fuel also didn't burn up in 5 seconds. It flooded down chases like stairwells and elevator shafts and allowed fires to spread from the initial point of impact to other combustible materials throughout the buildings.....which is the cause of the sounds of 'explosions' people reported in interviews after the events.

The buildings did not fall in the 'exact same way' as a controlled demolition. Nor did they fall 'into their own footprint'. Nor did they fall at 'free-fall speed'. All those claims have been debunked by Popular Mechanics as well as structural/Civil/mechanical & explosives engineers worldwide. Sure, some doubt the 'official' story, but that doesn't mean that the 'official' story is false. Also, those who doubt it have much less evidence to support their version of events. Matter of fact, the vast majority of their arguments stem from conjecture rather than evidence.

Larry Silverstein is a 'red herring' for conspiracy theorists as well as certain offices located in the buildings. Lots of people weren't in the buildings that day. Does that mean they, too, were part of the conspiracy?

Bottom-line: Claiming the event was orchestrated by our own government assumes those who dislike our country aren't resourceful or intelligent enough to pull it off under their own power.
​

Thank you.