Kill Dat Noize
Banned
Capitalism is great for *creating* a middle class but not *maintaining* it without socialism
That's because socialism lends itself to both opportunity and fairness.
Capitalism lends itself to opportunity and exploitation.
Capitalism is great for *creating* a middle class but not *maintaining* it without socialism
What I'm saying is look what capitalism is done for Detroit! I mean maybe things will turn around now that they've run all the downtrodden out. Detroit was a powerhouse that was raped by Capitalist and "Republican" core values. Someone made money but it wasn't the people that "should have", imo.
I don't know your exact situation, but I can speak for myself and say that "capitalism" has had adverse effects on my life and I'm relatively doing alright.
That's because socialism lends itself to bot
h opportunity and fairness.
Capitalism lends itself to opportunity and exploitation.
Detroit is in the state it's in because of negligence and incompetence, and down right thievery of elected officials, and nothing else
Why the fukk are you still posting here, you lame racist cac?
You're basically saying that race is the reason people are poor, even though the Chinese are the same race as most South East Asians.Your posts alternate between insulting blacks and insulting other non whites'. In this post you say that SE Asians will never succeed without latching onto Chinese because SE Asians are inferior to Chinese, which is the same argument white supremacists make for blacks and whites. In fact I've heard this very same argument with the words "Chinese" replaced with "white" and "SE Asian" replaced with black. You switched them in order to avoid censure here. What a coincidence.You're worst than @Anti Hero, @Brown Ant, and the rest. They were all banned. @Brooklynzson , when will this tried-and-true st0rmfr0nt troll be banned? @concise , do you have banning powers breh?
And by the way, the Chinese were once riddled with poverty. It's only since they started feteing with capitalism that they've experienced real material growth.
this post is irrelevant, for most of the 20th century china was a third world country and in a lot of ways it still is, the only reason it turned around was because china abandoned communism and embraced capitalism
doesn't work with 300 million people.A well managed mixed socialism/capitalism system seems to work very well for Norway.
Thriving Norway Provides an Economics Lesson
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/05/14/business/global/14frugal.html
One government CAN spend wisely: Everyone in Norway becomes a millionaire as parliament's cash stockpiles reach 1,000,000 kroner for each person
- Sovereign wealth fund ballooned due to high oil and gas prices
- Set up in 1990, the fund owns around 1 percent of the world's stocks
- Money is equivalent to £100,000 in sterling per person
- Norwegians will not be able to access or spend the money
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2536424/Everyone-Norway-millionaire.html#ixzz2vBF9po5O
doesn't work with 300 million people.
apples and oranges
depends on how much the managers/stake holders of 300 million piss away down the rabbit hole of debt and corruption.
9/10/2001: Rumsfeld says $2.3 TRILLION Missing fro
CBS Reports Pentagon Cannot Track $2.3 Trillion - WantToKnow.info
According to some estimates we cannot track $2.3 trillion in transactions
Black Budget: US govt clueless about missing Pentagon $trillions
Once you accept that you can't save everyone, the answer becomes invariably, yes.