Yeah, but scientists and science has already studied them over. Their DNA (phenotype) is closest to Asians (which Asians in particular I forgot). Just because their dark skinned doesn't make them black. That's like saying those dark ass Indians are black
silly rabbit
Australian Aborigines descend from the same lineage as the first modern humans to migrate from Africa, DNA analysis has confirmed. The find is a further blow to the idea that the evolution of indigenous Australians was marked by many migrations from Asia.
http://www.cosmosmagazine.com/news/dna-confirms-aboriginal-australian-origins/
Published and new samples of Aboriginal Australians and Melanesians were analyzed for mtDNA (n = 172) and Y variation (n = 522), and the resulting profiles were compared with the branches known so far within the global mtDNA and the Y chromosome tree. (i) All Australian lineages are confirmed to fall within the mitochondrial founder branches M and N and the Y chromosomal founders C and F, which are associated with the exodus of modern humans from Africa ≈50–70,000 years ago. The analysis reveals no evidence for any archaic maternal or paternal lineages in Australians, despite some suggestively robust features in the Australian fossil record, thus weakening the argument for continuity with any earlier Homo erectuspopulations in Southeast Asia. (ii) The tree of complete mtDNA sequences shows that Aboriginal Australians are most closely related to the autochthonous populations of New Guinea/Melanesia, indicating that prehistoric Australia and New Guinea were occupied initially by one and the same Palaeolithic colonization event ≈50,000 years ago, in agreement with current archaeological evidence.
http://www.pnas.org/content/104/21/8726
reference: http://www-personal.une.edu.au/~pbrown3/AusOrigins.html
maybe next time my "brother"