Disney loses famous Mickey Mouse copyright in 2024, along with many others

[David_TheMan]

Explain that last bit. Copyrights and patents are a registration system and still owned by the creator.

Copyright is literally the government stating they have and you the copyright holder have power over private property that I own. I buy paper, I pay for printing, I pay for publishing and distribution but you can now claim ownership over my property and what I do with it because you soneo how have a right to an idea, ue something intangible. This is no different than a patent, you claim you have ownership of a idea which allows you under the guide of government intrusion to steal my physical private property and take ownership of it away from me

There has never been a legal basis for that that satisfies the basic concepts of the common law that created our legal system

You simply can not own a idea as it's not possible to, and the only thing you can own is your owned, physically, execution of said idea, the actual product

This never existed until the British made it to curry favor from the elites to grant themselves government privilege and artificial profit and protection from competition.

 

[T’Challa’s Heir]

Copyright is literally the government stating they have and you the copyright holder have power over private property that I own. I buy paper, I pay for printing, I pay for publishing and distribution but you can now claim ownership over my property and what I do with it because you soneo how have a right to an idea, ue something intangible. This is no different than a patent, you claim you have ownership of a idea which allows you under the guide of government intrusion to steal my physical private property and take ownership of it away from me

There has never been a legal basis for that that satisfies the basic concepts of the common law that created our legal system

You simply can not own a idea as it's not possible to, and the only thing you can own is your owned, physically, execution of said idea, the actual product

This never existed until the British made it to curry favor from the elites to grant themselves government privilege and artificial profit and protection from competition.

You know copyrights and parents are literally in the Constitution right?

 

[David_TheMan]

You know copyrights and parents are literally in the Constitution right?

Did i state they were unconstitutional or did I state they aren't supported by the common law tradition the US was built off of?

It's literally a late British tradition that came over unfortunately, but the reality is copyrights and patents are government vehicles to steal private property and make the claim that ideals are tangibly and able to be physically safeguarded.

 

[T’Challa’s Heir]

Did i state they were unconstitutional or did I state they aren't supported by the common law tradition the US was built off of?

It's literally a late British tradition that came over unfortunately, but the reality is copyrights and patents are government vehicles to steal private property and make the claim that ideals are tangibly and able to be physically safeguarded.

I’m saying your entire common law rant sounds like sovereign citizen garbage. The documents that literally the US government included the protections. There’s a ton of stuff in the constitution that wasn’t in the common law; like a president for example.

 

[David_TheMan]

I’m saying your entire common law rant sounds like sovereign citizen garbage. The documents that literally the US government included the protections. There’s a ton of stuff in the constitution that wasn’t in the common law; like a president for example.

No it doesn't, because I have never said the law didn't apply.

I'm simply stating it doesn't align historically with origins of us law from it's common law origins.

Us constitutionality of the law was never questioned.

Us presidency or construction of government isn't a matter of common law but statue law.

 

[Deltron]

you know this dev was patiently waiting for 12 AM Jan 1 2024

 

[FromStLouis]

The same snowflakes who couldn't handle a black mermaid couldn't wait to turn Mickey into this shyt

 

[MenacingMonk]

These "film makers" were just waiting.

Spoiler: Poster

Expect lots of cease a desist letters to be printed.

 

[Artificial Intelligence]

These "film makers" were just waiting.

Spoiler: Poster

Expect lots of cease a desist letters to be printed.

As long as it’s steamboat mickey they’ll be good

 

[MenacingMonk]

As long as it’s steamboat mickey they’ll be good

But wouldn’t Disney have a case with how “similar” it looks to Mickey?

 

[Artificial Intelligence]

But wouldn’t Disney have a case with how “similar” it looks to Mickey?

If they add things like the gloves which aren’t in steamboat Willie they are fukked… they can also just say it’s a parody

 

[MenacingMonk]

If they add things like the gloves which aren’t in steamboat Willie they are fukked… they can also just say it’s a parody

The trailer of the movie I posted basically says it’s a MM ripoff. They actually use Mickey Mouse stuff that inspires the killer.

 

[CHICAGO]

The trailer of the movie I posted basically says it’s a MM ripoff. They actually use Mickey Mouse stuff that inspires the killer.

ALL THE OF STUFF THEY USE
IS RELATED TO STEAMBOAT WILLIE
VERSION OF MM.







​

 

[Roid Jones]

For clarification Steamboat Willie goes into public domain. Mickie Mouse himself is trademarked and remains Disney’s.

Is that it, so this is a non story

 

[MenacingMonk]

ALL THE OF STUFF THEY USE
IS RELATED TO STEAMBOAT WILLIE
VERSION OF MM.







​

There's a magazine in the trailer that says "Mickey Mouse" tho.