Disney (ABC/ESPN) has put an $18M per year contract renewal offer to Stephen A. Smith

Does this nikka take it


  • Total voters
    68

Thavoiceofthevoiceless

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
Aug 26, 2019
Messages
42,945
Reputation
3,065
Daps
132,369
Reppin
The Voiceless Realm
The most important thing he can cling to is he is the reason the network gets views and discussed outside of actual live sports, which they are awful at broadcasting regardless of the sport. Without Stephen A there is little reason to tune into ESPN from 7am to 7pm.

The casual audience does listen to him. It's the "hardcore, I listen to multiple podcasts dedicated to a single sport, and discuss sports on message boards audience" that has a problem with him. And guess what, those folks don't move the needle. Those are the same people who don't think CC is important in growing the WNBA...............as she proceeds to sell out the Atlanta Hawks arena. :mjlol:
If the casual audience did rock with him like that then his endeavors outside of sports would be more of a successful than they have been.

It’s a reason why he changed his podcast name from No Mercy after McAfee came into the fold as that shyt was a flop otherwise. His Disney+ show was a flop as hell hence why you never hear it mentioned by him at all.
 
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
180,199
Reputation
22,616
Daps
588,762
Reppin
49ers..Braves..Celtics
There was a study that showed whoever is calling the NFL games means basically nothing to the bottom line. I think broadcasters are starting to figure that out. The idea they gave Tom Brady that kind of money is wild because the study suggests that he won't attract more viewers than some regular ass play-by-play team.
 

Tribal Outkast

Veteran
Joined
Nov 22, 2016
Messages
30,898
Reputation
3,663
Daps
94,006
There was a study that showed whoever is calling the NFL games means basically nothing to the bottom line. I think broadcasters are starting to figure that out. The idea they gave Tom Brady that kind of money is wild because the study suggests that he won't attract more viewers than some regular ass play-by-play team.
You don’t give Tom Brady money like that if you don’t care who’s in the booth. They obviously care more about viewers than putting somebody up there who knows what they’re doing. Why demote Greg Olsen when he was doing a great job for them? CBS got Romo which helped them big time no matter what people think about Romo. Of course you’re going to throw money at Tom Brady, the guy considered the greatest QB ever. Fox just better hope it works out well for them.
 

Thavoiceofthevoiceless

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
Aug 26, 2019
Messages
42,945
Reputation
3,065
Daps
132,369
Reppin
The Voiceless Realm
There was a study that showed whoever is calling the NFL games means basically nothing to the bottom line. I think broadcasters are starting to figure that out. The idea they gave Tom Brady that kind of money is wild because the study suggests that he won't attract more viewers than some regular ass play-by-play team.
It doesn’t, but for someone like ESPN, paying Aikman and Buck brought stability to that MNF booth. It matters and why they backed the brinks truck to lure them from Fox even if it meant paying a premium.

Even ESPN could use that in the case of Countdown and their announce team as it makes a shytty viewing experience as a fan even if you’re going to watch it regardless.
 

Rekkapryde

GT, LWO, 49ERS, BRAVES, HAWKS, N4O...yeah UMAD!
Supporter
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
148,729
Reputation
26,579
Daps
499,962
Reppin
TYRONE GA!
Nobody is going to watch Fox over CBS because Tom Brady is calling the game. They are going to watch whichever game they have more interest in regardless of who is calling it.

Not to mention the majority of people will not even have access to watch the Tom Brady game depending on the week.

It's a joke he got that much money for a job he has no experience performing.

Stephen A carries ESPN. They don't have any personalities that drive a conversation or brings eyes like he does.
shyt is insane
 
  • Dap
Reactions: No1

Street Knowledge

Superstar
Supporter
Joined
May 2, 2012
Messages
24,312
Reputation
1,718
Daps
57,981
Reppin
NYC
There’s track record of his non-sports endeavors flopping.

His Disney+ show flopped and his podcast did as well hence him having to change the name.

$25 million is entertainment level bread and the casual audience has shown they don’t care about sports like that. They don't view him on the level of people like Kelly Ripa, Roberts and Strahan who command that type of bread.
Yeah he’s tried desperately the last decade to go outside the sports realm and it always flops
 

Still Benefited

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
39,563
Reputation
8,371
Daps
99,357
Stephen A has carried that network for years. But for some reason nikkas here think he should have been pushed out for more Tim Legler air time.

:mjlol:



Time for Stephen A to move around. Not for Tim Legler,but plenty of talent in the sports podcast space you could probably pay 3 million a year to.
 

K-Apps

Superstar
Supporter
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
14,168
Reputation
1,202
Daps
24,090
Reppin
Brick City/Happy Valley

K-Apps

Superstar
Supporter
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
14,168
Reputation
1,202
Daps
24,090
Reppin
Brick City/Happy Valley


ESPN’s biggest star doesn’t simply covet McAfeebucks—he also wants a McAfee-style deal structure that would pay him out like he’s running his own production company. What should Pitaro do?

stephen a. smith

Say what you will about Norby Williamson, ESPN’s recently defenestrated jack-of-all-trades who helped revolutionize the network during the past two decades until he ran into the Pat McAfee buzz saw. Williamson was a renowned talent whisperer who was known for making unpopular decisions and cleaning up Bristol micro-scandals, like the SC6 drama involving Jemele Hill and Michael Smith. But it’s hard to imagine that even Norby would have had the special sauce to manage the latest mushrooming talent challenge at ESPN.
As I reported last week, Stephen A. Smith, the network’s top talent, appears unwilling to countenance its recent five-year, $90 million offer, which would pay the voluble star $18 million per year. Instead, Smith covets the blockbuster deal that the network used to persuade McAfee to decamp last year from FanDuel. Notably, ESPN pays McAfee’s production company, which operates his talk show, $25 million a year—a fee that covers all its operating costs: salaries, insurance, fixed costs, etcetera. ESPN has also offered him about $5 million a year to appear on College GameDay, sources told me. (McAfee has yet to sign the deal.)
 
Top