FloorGeneral
I don't even know anymore...
*uses a mac*
http://www.macworld.com/article/116..._what_you_need_to_know.html#lsrc=twt_macworld
Why most Mac users aren’t at risk
All that said, there are two reasons why Macs are less at-risk than people on other platforms, despite being easy to exploit if the right conditions are in place.
The first, and most important, reason is that relatively few Macs are running the vulnerable version of Java. Any operating system running JRE 1.7 is affected, but the attack doesn’t work against JRE 1.6. That last one is the version that Mac users have installed (assuming they use Java at all).
The only way to update from Java 6 (1.6)—the last version supported by Apple—to Java 7 is by manually downloading and installing it from Oracle. And apparently few Mac users have done so: For example, according to a representative of Crashplan, the online backup service that uses Java for its client app, none of that company’s users (who must have Java installed) are using the vulnerable version.
The second reason you don’t have to worry, even if you do have Java 7 installed, is that Apple by default disabled Java applet support in Web browsers in its most recent Java security update. Starting with OS X 10.7 Lion, Java isn’t installed by default anyway. And even if you do turn on Java, OS X will turn it off again if you don’t use it for a while.
Many users do install Java for websites or applications (like Crashplan) that require it. But, again, even if you did install Java, the odds are very, very good that you aren’t running a vulnerable version.