Did atheism cause this professor to lose his mind and strip naked

[The Real]

Any ideology can lead to what you say here. Replace religion with science. Many men, many many many many men, have been driven mad by their endeavors in the scientific community. The term mad scientist, is real. Watch "The Reanimator". Its so demonic, friend.

Any positive ideology, yes, because they actually make positive claims. Atheism does not fall into that category because it is a lack of belief in something without any necessary belief in something else.

For example, many Buddhists are atheists because they do not believe in a creator God, or any gods as we understand them, but they are not the same as Dawkins, because they still believe in reincarnation, enlightenment, and other spiritual and supernatural ideas. What unites Dawkins and Buddhists is a negative idea, a lack of something, rather than any positive one.

Science as a practice doesn't fall into this category either. Some elements of scientific institution might, though, because some scientists do believe that certain positive and normative claims are part of science (there are religious scientists, after all.) The difference between that and religion is that all religion is that way, because religion as a whole is defined by such claims.

 

[Julius Skrrvin]

what is this from

 

[Mr. Somebody]

Any positive ideology, yes, because they actually make positive claims. Atheism does not fall into that category because it is a lack of belief in something without any necessary belief in something else.

For example, many Buddhists are atheists because they do not believe in a creator God, or any gods as we understand them, but they are not the same as Dawkins, because they still believe in reincarnation, enlightenment, and other spiritual and supernatural ideas. What unites Dawkins and Buddhists is a negative idea, a lack of something, rather than any positive one.

Science as a practice doesn't fall into this category either. Some elements of scientific institution might, though, because some scientists do believe that certain positive and normative claims are part of science (there are religious scientists, after all.) The difference between that and religion is that all religion is that way, because religion as a whole is defined by such claims.

Buddhist still believe in the spirit realm and i personally know many that still believe in a creator of all things. Buddhism doesnt require you to not believe in God friend because it concerns itself more with philosophy then the origin of creation, friend

Men have been driven mad by their idealological pursuits in science. There is no way around that. But, to be driven mad as you claim, you should already be unstable, not that science or relgion in itself, will drive you crazy. It seems like your eyes are opening finally, friend.

 

[Dusty Bake Activate]

Clearly atheism removes barriers of restraint necessary for men to keep their mind out of a demonic zone. With these barriers removed, demons from the pagan era are allowed to enter him and influence him to live out their satanic traditions.

Still, friend, this man should be tested for drugs before any further conclusions can be drawn because these arent the actions of a man with the types of responsibilities that he had.

Spoiler

You probably just pissed your fuschia gi, you carton of juicy fruit.

 

[Gallo]

what is this from

[ame=http://youtu.be/0z6xGU2_g9s]FEWDIO Horror: Bedfellows - YouTube[/ame]