Kell Brook's win over Porter wasn't an easy win nikka..
Are you stupid??!!.. Khan used his straight jab very effectively, BUT he held the fukk out of Porter anytime he got inside and the ref allowed it.. It was a close good fight.. Kell Brook beats Canelo and Cotto as well
Kell Brook beat Shawn Porter easily...fukk you talking about?
A simple jab and straights from the outside and holding on the inside neutralized Shawn Porter
Beat Porter 8 rounds to 4 with a basic ass gameplan, what the hell fight were YOU watching
Then you say Kell Brook beats Miguel Cotto (the one who Floyd fought) and Canelo Alvarez as well
Canelo's win over Lara was gift decision breh.. Lara outlanded him the entire fight.
No...Lara out RAN him the whole night
Dude was on his bike the entire fight and Canelo rightfully won the fight. Lara outlanded Canelo only by 10 punches anyways...not enough for you to be bringing it up like it matters
Act like Shane wasn't washed the fukk up and way over the hill when Canelo fought him, and it still wasnt a struggle victory..
It was a STRUGGLE victory?
Canelo Alvarez destroyed Shane Mosley...fukk are you talking about breh?
Canelo won 11 rounds to 1 round on 2 of the judge's cards and 10 rounds to 2 rounds on another judge's card.....I had it 10 rounds to 2 rounds myself.
Canelo landed 348 punches at 52% in that fight compared to Mosley's 183 at 25%....and you call that a STRUGGLE win?
Man GTFOH with this "the Cotto that Floyd fought" Nonsense. You sound silly.. He's the same Cotto that Pac beat... The same Cotto that Trout beat nikka.. The little trouble Cotto put Floyd in was only because Floyd decided to get off his bike and go toe to toe where it cost him... Floyd looked vulnerable against a washed up Cotto.. Yes the cotto Floyd fought was washed up.. Act like he wasn't brehs.
Act like Margarito and Sergio weren't done when Cotto beat them .
Nigguhhh please..
Who brought up Sergio Martinez?
Secondly, the Cotto that Floyd beat was better than May 2013 Shawn Porter AND Devon Alexander....what the HELL ARE YOU TALKING ABOUT?
Yes, Cotto wasnt in his prime, but he was STILL better than those 2. Again, he was RING ranked #1 at 154 and the Champion at 154. Why the hell would Floyd fight no-name Shawn Porter who's best win was Alfonso Gomez or Devon Alexander who was MOST known for quitting against Timothy Bradley, over Miguel Cotto who was 8-2 in his last 10 fights against names like Zab Judah, Shane Mosley, Alfonso Gomez, Joshua Clottey, Ricardo Mayorga, Yuri Foreman, and Antonio Margarito ?
Lara, Porter, Devon, would not get completely dominated for 12 rounds the way Canelo did.. Even Cotto washed up ass held his own better than Canelo... Get off his tip breh
How the hell do YOU know? nikka, you was the SAME ONE SAYING FLOYD WOULDNT FIGHT CANELO AND WOULD DUCK HIM!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Floyd fought him, beat his ass convincingly with a boxing clinic, and then you try and change the narrative....fukk outta here with that shyt
The difference was there was no belt on the line
Oscar wasn't a champion
Aint no difference except that you are a Pacquiao stan who lies over and over and over again in regards to Floyd Mayweather to the point your opinion on anything Floyd related is null and void.
You cant even give the dude credit for beating the guy YOU said he would duck.....and beating him convincingly.
There is NO difference between ODLH fighting Manny Pacquiao at 147 in his 1st fight there than it would be if Floyd fought Danny Garcia at 147 in his first fight there except Danny is the man at 140....Pacquiao jumped the division.
And he didn't fight Canelo straight up... he demanded a catchweight after fighting at the full limit twice before already
Canelo's team said they would fight Floyd at 150 before Floyd even looked into the fight
And who cares anyways. How dare a Pacquiao fan brings up catchweights anyways...... you was giddy over Pacquiao fighting Margarito at a catchweight of 150 for the 154 title, but NOW you got a problem with Floyd fighting Canelo at a catchweight (that Canelo brought up FIRST) because Floyd beat a MUCH better fighter at 154 for the belt than Pacquiao did?
What was Broner rank @ WW though Newzz??
His only win at anything past 135 was against washed up Pauletta
nikka...he was ranked #6 P4P and was the WBA Welterweight Champion of the world, you're killing me
And you say Paulie was washed up, but yet HE was the WBA Welterweight Champion, 5-0 in his last 5 fights, including beating Senchenko (who was the undefeated champion and the 4-1 favorite) for the belt
His win against maidan was more recent, and it was in THIS weight class.. not JWW.. Yea he got tired of getting head butted over and kver by Bradley and said fukk it. So what.. Maidana was only in the runnings because he's more known.. Now you're being honest.. Never had anything to do with his skills, wins, or losses... When they pose a threat, its always, "you got _______ and ________problems.
Maidana aint beat a real opponent at WW. Ill never consider that victory over AB anything of significance, because he's not a WW and is barely a JWW.. they scared to even put him in vs top guys at 140.. over ther fighting Zach Ryder leftovers
why you only going back 5 fights with Devon, but you go 10 fights back to make a case for Cotto..
your agenda
There's no agenda on my end....I dont fukk with Floyd, BUT I can be unbias
I can go through Devon's whole career and compare it to Miguel's career up until the point he fought Floyd.......there's no comparision. Only a fool would say that fukking Devon Alexander was/is better than Miguel Cotto leading up to the fight with Floyd
We already know your agenda though, so it's pointless.
but everyone who poses a threat all of a sudden has to beat every single person they ever lost to..
He wasnt even considered "legit" until he beat Shawn Porter THIS year.....you're saying Floyd should've fought him in September 2011 (when he fought Ortiz) or May 2013 (when he fought Guerrero)?
