Denzel Washington, Tom Hanks Make a Case for Star Power

Street Knowledge

Superstar
Supporter
Joined
May 2, 2012
Messages
24,297
Reputation
1,718
Daps
57,921
Reppin
NYC
Denzel Washington, Tom Hanks Make a Case for Star Power
Denzel Washington, Tom Hanks Make a Case for Star Power

denzel-washington-fences.jpg

Antoine Fuqua knew what it would take to get him to remake “The Magnificent Seven,” John Sturges’ 1960 classic about a band of gunslingers. The film, which was itself a remake of Akira Kurosawa’s 1954 movie “The Seven Samurai,” is an oft-told story about a band of mercenaries who save a town. Its genetic code can be found in everything from “Star Wars” to “The Three Amigos.” But Fuqua knew how to give the familiar yarn a fresh spin.

In an interview with NPR, Fuqua said he turned to studio executives and told them, “Personally, what would make this an event for me to really want to make this movie is to see Denzel Washington on a horse in all black as a cowboy.'”


Of course, getting Denzel to ride into town takes a big check and often a taste of the backend. But in an era of diminishing star power, Washington is one of the only major actors who is still worth his salary. His movies have racked up nearly $2.3 billion at the domestic box office, and despite entering his sixties, the actor’s on a torrid streak at the box office, racking up hits such as “The Equalizer,” “Safe House,” and “Flight.” Add “The Magnificent Seven” to their ranks, after the Western picked up a sterling $35 million this weekend, confirming Washington’s popular appeal.

Promoted by Intel


See How Intel Keeps This Actress And Coder Connected While She Pursues Her Unique Passions

“Denzel is always in the zone and relevant and exciting to watch,” said Rory Bruer, distribution chief at Sony, the studio behind “The Magnificent Seven.” “I think that’s true for women and men.”

Nor is Washington the only actor demonstrating the powerful bond between movie stars and their fans. Tom Hanks, who, like Washington, has been a fixture on screens since the ’80s, has powered “Sully” to nearly $100 million at the box office, largely because his name is above the title. Both films were released within weeks of each other.

ComScore senior media analyst Paul Dergarabedian argues that Washington and Hanks have earned the good will of their audience over decades by mixing in Oscar-bait like “Philadelphia” and “Malcolm X” alongside more commercial plays such as “The Da Vinci Code” and “American Gangster.” In the process, their names have been synonymous with quality. “They’re on the Mount Rushmore of bankable stars,” said Dergarabedian.

As evidence of their favored statues, 27% of customers who saw “The Magnificent Seven” bought tickets because of Washington’s presence, while 39% checked out “Sully” on account of Hanks, according to a comScore survey. In the case of “The Equalizer,” a 2014 vigilante film with Washington administering harsh justice, 51% of people saw the movie thanks to its star. Usually, fewer than 10% of people buy tickets to a movie because of its lead.

But while Washington and Hanks’ endurance is impressive, it also points to the troubling fact that Hollywood has done a terrible job of cultivating the next generation of Tom’s and Denzel’s. Jennifer Lawrence may be the only twenty-something actress who is a reliable draw at the box office, while other promising up-and-comers, such as Ryan Gosling, Joseph Gordon-Levitt, and Shailene Woodley, have been more successful at landing on magazine covers than selling movie tickets.

Chris Pratt, Washington’s co-star in “The Magnificent Seven,” made waves in “Jurassic World” and “Guardians of the Galaxy,” but one was a sequel to a hugely successful franchise, while the other had Marvel’s marketing heft behind it. The true test of his star power will come with the Christmas release of “Passengers,” a sci-fi romance where he’ll get an assist from Lawrence, his co-star in the film.

How things have changed. James Andrew Miller’s recent talent agency expose, “Powerhouse: The Untold Story of Hollywood’s Creative Artists Agency,” recounts an age where star power was everything. During the Reagan and Clinton eras, movie icons were at their zenith. It was a time when Arnold Schwarzenegger, Julia Roberts, Robert Redford, and Tom Cruise were so in demand that studios had to accede to their every whims — from private jets to trainers to trailers that spanned city blocks.

As Hollywood has grown more corporatized, it’s moved away from movies that depend on the charisma of an actor to draw crowds. Instead, studios back comic-book movies and animated fare that don’t rely on big names to find an audience. Those films spawn sequel after sequel, and if an actor gets too demanding, it’s easy to find someone new to slip on Spider-Man’s spandex or Batman’s cowl. But it has also left studios without the kind of talent pool needed to headline smaller budgeted dramas and comedies that can be major sources of profit.

Neither Washington nor Hanks has ever appeared in a superhero film. Like many actors in their generation, they didn’t need to. Their superpower was their charm and their greatest ability was to convey some idealized version of ourselves — more decent, attractive, and humane. No cape required.
 

Rapmastermind

Superstar
Joined
Aug 17, 2012
Messages
10,673
Reputation
3,338
Daps
39,626
Reppin
New York City
This was Denzel's 16th 20+ Million Dollar Opening Weekend. Tom got "Sully" flying high and "DaVinci Code 3: Inferno" about to drop during the holidays. No Hollywood has found it's new Denzel or Hanks or Cruise or the Harrison Ford's. Now even Will is apart of the old guard of Hollywood. The new cast of stars just can't really "Sell" it on their own. They need strong marketing and franchises. Meanwhile Denzel can remake a Classic Western and Tom can drop another Bio-Pic and they both are knocking it out fo the park. Because audiences trust them.

Pratt has a bright future but it's early. I'll give him "Guardians" but "Jurassic World" was definitely bigger than him, he helped to make it a success but he wasn't the focal point reason it was. Ryan Rynalds is very up or down. Chris Hansworth outside of the Mavel more films that flopped or underperformed. Chris has been Captain America for years and hasn't broken out with a different project. So the "Leading Man" hasn't risen up from this generation.
 
Last edited:

the next guy

Superstar
Joined
May 2, 2012
Messages
38,882
Reputation
1,477
Daps
37,281
Reppin
NULL
This was Denzel's 16th 20+ Million Dollar Opening Weekend. Tom got "Sully" flying high and "DaVinci Code 3: Inferno" about to drop during the holidays. No Hollywood has found it's new Denzel or Hanks or Cruise or the Harrison Ford's. Now even Will is apart of the old guard of Hollywood. The new cast of stars just can't really "Sell" it on their own. They need strong marketing and franchises. Meanwhile Denzel can remake a Classic Western and Tom can drop another Bio-Pic and they both are knocking it out fo the park. Because audiences trust them.

Pratt has a bright future but it's early. I'll give him "Guardians" but "Jurassic World" was definitely bigger than him, he helped to make it a success but he wasn't the focal point reason it was. Ryan Rynalds is very up or down. Chris Hansworth outside of the Mavel more films that flopped or underperformed. Chris has been Captain America for years and hasn't broken out with a different project. So the "Leading Man" hasn't risen up from this generation.
Because there was a talent drought in the mid 2000s. So many bad youth movies were made. Let's see if the kids can do because the last youth movement was a bust.
 

Woodrow

Superstar
Joined
May 26, 2012
Messages
8,289
Reputation
1,576
Daps
32,525
Reppin
NULL
The problem was until recently, there was no replacements for them. Let's see what Pratt and MBJ can do like I said in another thread.

with all due respect to MBJ, who is a fantastic young actor on the come-up, he doesnt belong anywhere remotely close to this conversation. not yet.

potentially, could he have next? absolutely. but pratt has two blockbusters to his name, and i wouldnt even put HIM in the tom hanks/denzel discussion yet. that's another level of superstar status. they've literally cranked out so many reliably good-to-great-to-phenomenal flicks that people dont even ask what the next flick is about. if one of those names is on it, ppl go see. the end. does that sound like a status level MBJ is anywhere close to achieving as an actor?
 

the next guy

Superstar
Joined
May 2, 2012
Messages
38,882
Reputation
1,477
Daps
37,281
Reppin
NULL
with all due respect to MBJ, who is a fantastic young actor on the come-up, he doesnt belong anywhere remotely close to this conversation. not yet.

potentially, could he have next? absolutely. but pratt has two blockbusters to his name, and i wouldnt even put HIM in the tom hanks/denzel discussion yet. that's another level of superstar status. they've literally cranked out so many reliably good-to-great-to-phenomenal flicks that people dont even ask what the next flick is about. if one of those names is on it, ppl go see. the end. does that sound like a status level MBJ is anywhere close to achieving as an actor?
Fair enough. He could have next though. Even now the lack of talent still shows beyond that first layer of the new crop. He needs a solo vehicle that's not a superhero movie, like Passengers. He's not there now but if he picks the right parts, things should happen. I don't think any of them are, like you said, but well see in about 1.5 2 years where it's at. I would have laughed 3 years ago if you told me Jonah Hill would be a 2 time oscar nominee.
 

Roman Brady

Nobody Lives Forever
Joined
May 9, 2012
Messages
16,749
Reputation
-1,050
Daps
14,882
Lol at all this mjb talk, ppl are so thirsty for him to have next but he's not the one. Just doesn't have the range nor charisma. You can't be a crossover star only being good at playing sullen characters and mean mugging all the time. In the roles that he thought were white roles (his words) he came off as a phoney
 

the next guy

Superstar
Joined
May 2, 2012
Messages
38,882
Reputation
1,477
Daps
37,281
Reppin
NULL
Lol at all this mjb talk, ppl are so thirsty for him to have next but he's not the one. Just doesn't have the range nor charisma. You can't be a crossover star only being good at playing sullen characters and mean mugging all the time. In the roles that he thought were white roles (his words) he came off as a phoney
I beg to differ. Creed showed a great range of emotions.
 
Top