Democratic Party Rebuild

☑︎#VoteDemocrat

The Original
WOAT
Supporter
Joined
Dec 9, 2012
Messages
310,932
Reputation
-34,203
Daps
621,144
Reppin
The Deep State
@FAH1223 can we ban this weirdo, from the thread at the least. He's obviously a paid agent account
You can’t debate so you run to the mods. At least stand on your own two and argue like a man.

Again, stop reaching out to loser voters. You dont even stand for anything viable. You got trannies and single payer healthcare.

Anything else?

We need Get Money democrats….Clinton 2.0 :mjgrin:
 

☑︎#VoteDemocrat

The Original
WOAT
Supporter
Joined
Dec 9, 2012
Messages
310,932
Reputation
-34,203
Daps
621,144
Reppin
The Deep State
Do your government documents say you're Indian
You tell me.

I’ve proven I’m black. Prove you’re black.

:sas1:
:mjpls:



IMG-8223.jpg


:coffee:

:sas2:
 

Schmoove

All Star
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
5,248
Reputation
276
Daps
6,360
The Dems need to understand the Obama coalition is probably never going to happen again. That's step 1

The Obama coalition was built mostly out of desperation. Democrats usually don't win the White House and definitely not the WH + both Congressional chambers unless they're asked to clean up a Republican mess. And the party needs to make THAT part of it's identity. "We don't make the mess. We clean up the mess you vote for Republicans to create."

Someone else said it in here... the party does need a rebrand but it has to be honest about what America truly is.
 

Loose

Retired Legend
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
45,560
Reputation
2,586
Daps
135,214
You can’t debate so you run to the mods. At least stand on your own two and argue like a man.

Again, stop reaching out to loser voters. You dont even stand for anything viable. You got trannies and single payer healthcare.

Anything else?

We need Get Money democrats….Clinton 2.0 :mjgrin:
Yea we need more corporate neoliberal democrats that screw over the people at the bottom :skip:
 

☑︎#VoteDemocrat

The Original
WOAT
Supporter
Joined
Dec 9, 2012
Messages
310,932
Reputation
-34,203
Daps
621,144
Reppin
The Deep State
Yea we need more corporate neoliberal democrats that screw over the people at the bottom :skip:
The people on the bottom said fukk us. I don’t care for this woe is me poor guy shyt anymore.

So now, let let them swim. No more saving them.

I need the dems to get more elite. You can go swim with the trash.
 

☑︎#VoteDemocrat

The Original
WOAT
Supporter
Joined
Dec 9, 2012
Messages
310,932
Reputation
-34,203
Daps
621,144
Reppin
The Deep State
@AquaCityBoy are you daft?

 
Joined
Aug 21, 2014
Messages
3,661
Reputation
1,111
Daps
15,542
Let’s keep it 100 if Kamala ignored progressives on the VP pick she would have gotten more votes.

A lot of moderate cacs thought Walz was gay, a beta, a liar and thought of him as tampon Tim. I completely disagree with them but the electorate are simple minded retards.

If Kamala picked Shapiro or Beshear her probability of winning might have been higher because they wouldn’t have the same “LGBT baggage”.

I say that to say, maybe we aren’t as tapped in to what will work with the more close minded electorate and allow Martin to cook. He seems to be saying the right things on what went wrong
Ive been asking this since the election because the math doesn't check out. How did Kamala lose because enough of the far left protest voted against her, yet if she had ignored that section of her voting bloc completely, she would've done better? I recall you saying that her ignoring the pro-palestine section of the party was good politics so she could pick up the pro-zionist voters (which obviously didn't pan out) and this feels like the same bad math
 

Outlaw

New Hope For the HaveNotz
Joined
May 6, 2012
Messages
6,018
Reputation
328
Daps
19,243
Reppin
Buzz City, NC :blessed:
Ive been asking this since the election because the math doesn't check out. How did Kamala lose because enough of the far left protest voted against her, yet if she had ignored that section of her voting bloc completely, she would've done better? I recall you saying that her ignoring the pro-palestine section of the party was good politics so she could pick up the pro-zionist voters (which obviously didn't pan out) and this feels like the same bad math
Just a gut feeling I have based on asking moderate cacs who voted third party in a swing state and criticism Walz received online from non dem voters.

Walz was seen as in the closet and gay. I completely disagree with that notion obviously but a black woman at the top of the ticket and a closeted gay man as her VP was too much for the vulnerable minded cacs to handle.

IMO Beshear was the best choice


I also don’t see how you can claim it was “bad math” we don’t know how things would play out if she was more pro Palestinian.

She could have lost by bigger margins if she went anti Zionist. The media has been in the bag of Trump for years and any controversy would be weaponized against her
 
Last edited:
Top