Democratic Party Rebuild

the cac mamba

Veteran
Joined
May 21, 2012
Messages
103,245
Reputation
13,763
Daps
301,005
Reppin
NULL
No she didn't she was an EXTENSION OF BIDEN and his economy and ran a rightward campaign that catered to republicans. You centrist kill me with this bullshyt.
you lie shamelessly

of course she was seen as an extension of bidenflation, but kamala got buried for all the clips of her in 2020, running on the weird, fakkity progressive nonsense that you espouse on here daily. america perceived her as a radical leftist, period.
 

Loose

Retired Legend
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
46,480
Reputation
2,686
Daps
137,722
you lie shamelessly

of course she was seen as an extension of bidenflation, but kamala got buried for all the clips of her in 2020, running on the weird, fakkity progressive nonsense that you espouse on here daily. america perceived her as a radical leftist, period.
Kamala wasn't even liked by her own party you fukking idiot, she lost the primary in 2020 because she was seen as TOO tough on crime, even with not being loved by her own party, and running a right wing campaign she still did better than biden would have done with his own base. We ran 3 fukking moderates and had to change candidates 3 times in a 12 year period. We ran 3 losers who want to appeal to people who stand for nothing and guess what? Those losers who dont stand for anything didn't vote for her biden or Hillary. Keep chasing this imaginary both sides republican if you want too
 

the cac mamba

Veteran
Joined
May 21, 2012
Messages
103,245
Reputation
13,763
Daps
301,005
Reppin
NULL
Kamala wasn't even liked by her own party you fukking idiot, she lost the primary in 2020 because she was seen as TOO tough on crime, even with not being loved by her own party, and running a right wing campaign she still did better than biden would have done with his own base. We ran 3 fukking moderates and had to change candidates 3 times in a 12 year period. We ran 3 losers who want to appeal to people who stand for nothing and guess what? They didn't vote for her
your fakkit ass, lunatic candidates on the far left will never even sniff 20% in a democrat primary. because you're too fukking weird. and you refuse to change your weird, voter-repellent behavior

keep crying.
 

Loose

Retired Legend
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
46,480
Reputation
2,686
Daps
137,722
your fakkit ass, lunatic candidates on the far left will never even sniff 20% in a democrat primary. because you're too fukking weird. and you refuse to change your weird, voter-repellent behavior

keep crying.
Bernie sniffed 39% in a Primary with the party being AGAINST HIM you fukking idiot :dead: you can't even get your lies together
 

the cac mamba

Veteran
Joined
May 21, 2012
Messages
103,245
Reputation
13,763
Daps
301,005
Reppin
NULL
Bernie sniffed 39% in a Primary with the party being AGAINST HIM you fukking idiot :dead: you can't even get your lies together
that 1 on 1 primary in 2016, that hillary bought? :laff:

no, idiot. a real, full primary, with 10 people. there will never be a 2016 primary again
 

Loose

Retired Legend
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
46,480
Reputation
2,686
Daps
137,722
that 1 on 1 primary in 2016, that hillary bought? :laff:

no, idiot. a real, full primary, with 10 people. there will never be a 2016 primary again
Did you forget he was whipping biden ass in 2020 too before the party decided they wanted a centrist and went down to 3 and forced a bunch of endorsements/$ :dead:. Your argument is proving my point
 

☑︎#VoteDemocrat

The Original
WOAT
Supporter
Joined
Dec 9, 2012
Messages
314,417
Reputation
-34,223
Daps
624,161
Reppin
The Deep State
Bernie sniffed 39% in a Primary with the party being AGAINST HIM you fukking idiot :dead: you can't even get your lies together
Bernie’s plan was to win a plurality of votes then he got tanked when the other dozen candidates dropped out. Thats not a “winning” strategy.



:gucci:
 

the cac mamba

Veteran
Joined
May 21, 2012
Messages
103,245
Reputation
13,763
Daps
301,005
Reppin
NULL
Did you forget he was whipping biden ass in 2020 too before the party decided they wanted a centrist and went down to 3 and forced a bunch of endorsements :dead:. Your argument is proving my point
winning a few states before all 50 vote is totally meaningless, idiot.

you basically just bragged about democrats getting NY and CA called for them early on election night :mjlol:

fukk bernie. he is irrelevant. and in 2016 and 2020, he was not running on the weird fakkitry progressives run on today
 

King Kreole

natural blondie like goku
Joined
Mar 8, 2014
Messages
15,975
Reputation
4,513
Daps
43,843
A biological woman calling herself a man is enough for you to call them a man?
For me personally? Absolutely, I was raised with basic social graces so I default to referring to people in the way they wish to be referred to if it's not harming anybody. It is absolutely no skin off my back to give basic human dignity and respect to a transgender man by accepting their desire to be called a man.

In terms of the broader social/academic discussion around what constitutes a gender, a person with biological components of a female but self-identifies as a man and has the social lived experience of a man is enough to consider them a man.
 

Loose

Retired Legend
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
46,480
Reputation
2,686
Daps
137,722
winning a few states before all 50 vote is totally meaningless, idiot
U brought up a primary idiot. We seen a 2x that a progressive could win 40% of the primary votes while the party theyre supposed to be running with has paid for them to lose.
 

☑︎#VoteDemocrat

The Original
WOAT
Supporter
Joined
Dec 9, 2012
Messages
314,417
Reputation
-34,223
Daps
624,161
Reppin
The Deep State
For me personally? Absolutely, I was raised with basic social graces so I default to referring to people in the way they wish to be referred to if it's not harming anybody. It is absolutely no skin off my back to give basic human dignity and respect to a transgender man by accepting their desire to be called a man.

In terms of the broader social/academic discussion around what constitutes a gender, a person with biological components of a female but self-identifies as a man and has the social lived experience of a man is enough to consider them a man.

Why should transgenders be permitted to change their government documents when medical interventions are sex specific?

 

☑︎#VoteDemocrat

The Original
WOAT
Supporter
Joined
Dec 9, 2012
Messages
314,417
Reputation
-34,223
Daps
624,161
Reppin
The Deep State
Because the purpose of government documents is not solely for the domain of medical intervention. :dahell:
Wrong. Your drivers license shows your organ donor status. It should reflect reality, not social accommodation. In the event of an emergency, ground-truth matters, no a shifting social convenience

 
Top