Democratic Party Rebuild

the cac mamba

Veteran
Joined
May 21, 2012
Messages
105,039
Reputation
13,995
Daps
304,995
Reppin
NULL
more soft, pathetic euphemisms from the left, in the CR bill. we're supposed to call criminals "justice-involved individuals" now :laff:

GfG9bnYW8AAO_Ve
 

No1

Retired.
Supporter
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
31,118
Reputation
5,025
Daps
70,183
Republicans swept the government and they still at each other necks while Dems fell in line to their old guard.


It's supposed to be the other way around. :why:
 

the cac mamba

Veteran
Joined
May 21, 2012
Messages
105,039
Reputation
13,995
Daps
304,995
Reppin
NULL
now that Trump won Hispanic men outright, will Democrats finally stop pandering to people who come here illegally?

maybe one of the Allstars can explain the political payoff to me
 

Loose

Retired Legend
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
48,056
Reputation
2,887
Daps
140,631
Don't see where this phrasing change becomes problematic.
Its cac mamba , he's white he considers anything " woke" and soft typical Ron desantis cac.

Anyway democrat voters should be putting their neck on democrats neck under no circumstances biden raise the debt ceiling for trump tax cuts.
 

Rice N Beans

Junior Hayley Stan
Supporter
Joined
May 5, 2012
Messages
11,363
Reputation
1,706
Daps
23,628
Reppin
Chicago, IL
Its cac mamba , he's white he considers anything " woke" and soft typical Ron desantis cac.

Anyway democrat voters should be putting their neck on democrats neck under no circumstances biden raise the debt ceiling for trump tax cuts.

Even with the skewed viewpoint, the new wording better fits the definition as written in the act.

But I bring attention to it since it is both a good program and the new verbiage is better on point. To be fake-outraged over it is disingenuous at best, but you're right I forget who the poster is. :dead:
 

the cac mamba

Veteran
Joined
May 21, 2012
Messages
105,039
Reputation
13,995
Daps
304,995
Reppin
NULL
Even with the skewed viewpoint, the new wording better fits the definition as written in the act.

But I bring attention to it since it is both a good program and the new verbiage is better on point. To be fake-outraged over it is disingenuous at best, but you're right I forget who the poster is. :dead:
judges and bailiffs are also "justice affected people". it's a stupid fukking term :dead:
 

the cac mamba

Veteran
Joined
May 21, 2012
Messages
105,039
Reputation
13,995
Daps
304,995
Reppin
NULL
If california can't lead us into the 20th century( yes I said that right) no one else will. They should ban all gas trains by some date too fukk it. Our infrastructure is straight up garbage compared the rest of devleoped world
so rolling blackout california, is gonna magically electrify the whole state? for every car? adequately replace the convenience of gas stations, for every single apartment renter? :laff:good luck with that

but if anyone can do it, it's the same people who spent 24 billion to increase homelessness :wow:
 

Loose

Retired Legend
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
48,056
Reputation
2,887
Daps
140,631
so rolling blackout california, is gonna magically electrify the whole state? for every car? adequately replace the convenience of gas stations, for every single apartment renter? :laff:
Called infrastructure investment, I know you're the typical " america first" republican who is ironically ok with America being behind every single developed country :dead:


good luck with that

but if anyone can do it, it's the same people who spent 24 billion to increase homelessness :wow:
We spend 800 billion on the military and this cac think spending on infrastructure is too much :laff:
 

the cac mamba

Veteran
Joined
May 21, 2012
Messages
105,039
Reputation
13,995
Daps
304,995
Reppin
NULL
Called infrastructure investment,
yeah? how are california democrats doing on that bullet train? :laff:

you're just writing off the obscene level of union corruption, grift, and cost overrun that's gonna come of this? what is california's track record on infrastructure? :laff:
 
Top