I am just saying that sometimes, blood must flow.
DEI for white guys
- Thread starter yung Herbie Hancock
- Start date
I am just saying that sometimes, blood must flow.
O.T.I.S.
Veteran
They’re just bowing to their new king
Roger king
Superstar
The conservatives and republicans never cared about meritocracy, they are fine with nepotism and favor and bias as long as it favors white men not black people
King_Kamala61
TheColi's Favorite Artist
You not American bytch
Gary, Indiana is a predominately black city, OP
2020 was an anomaly. The voting conditions that year produced unusual results. You should not expect them again.Nah they didnt come out its the fact 18 million fukkin democrats stayed home
In The Zone '98
Superstar
Marketing cutting jobs is wild
UnQuantized
Superstar
The people around Trump realize that a cult of personality has formed around him, so they can do as they please because MAGA cultist will accept anything as long as Trump is the figurehead. However, we will see how far MAGA are willing to be pushed until they snap. There is going to be a lot of angry people.
2 Up 2 Down
Veteran
Voter turnout in United States presidential elections - Wikipedia
2024 turnout was still higher than pre2020 numbers
Before we get up in arms about something, we should first make a determination of exactly how helpful it actually was to us. We hear something that should help our people, but we don't look deeper to see if it really is helping our people at a rate that is significant enough to bemoan it being removed. In the realm of corporate efforts..
"Overall, white women have benefited disproportionally from corporate DEI efforts."
"Racial disparities were once the result of explicit policy and discrimination — think “Whites Only Need Apply” signs — but today, it’s subtle cultural processes that lead to unequal outcomes for Black workers, Adia Harvey Wingfield, a professor at Washington University in St. Louis and the author of “Gray Areas: How the Way We Work Perpetuates Racism and What We Can Do to Fix It,” argues in her book."
We judge stuff too much from a surface level, expressing anger and disappointment based on a very limit amount of knowledge concerning the issue. We are told, DEI is good. So taking it away is seen as a loss to us. Though, when you research deeper on the issue, you find out that it was mainly good for White women, and it was not accomplishing anything near what its stated purpose is suppose to be.
We need policies tailored to help our particular issues, but unfortunately at the moment neither party has the desire nor will to do that. For the Democrats, every policy they make stating it will help us, is always diluted with measures to make sure there is a backdoor that allows the policy to actually help others more. As for the Republicans, well they do not feel the need to even fake the funk about the issue, and will just tell us to build our own. (Which WS will seek to destroy if our own becomes too successful in uplifting us).
Still, in the end, the true solution is to uplift ourselves no matter the costs. As long as we are waiting on those who benefit from our present circumstances to do it, we will always receive little to no support in doing it. It will always be just window dressing to mullify the masses who are not apt to look any deeper than the surface.
"Overall, white women have benefited disproportionally from corporate DEI efforts."
Who Benefits From Diversity And Inclusion Efforts?
Who Benefits From Diversity And Inclusion Efforts?
With all the financial investment, time and attention put into advancing diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI) in corporations, it is crucial to understand who benefit...www.forbes.com
"Racial disparities were once the result of explicit policy and discrimination — think “Whites Only Need Apply” signs — but today, it’s subtle cultural processes that lead to unequal outcomes for Black workers, Adia Harvey Wingfield, a professor at Washington University in St. Louis and the author of “Gray Areas: How the Way We Work Perpetuates Racism and What We Can Do to Fix It,” argues in her book."
We judge stuff too much from a surface level, expressing anger and disappointment based on a very limit amount of knowledge concerning the issue. We are told, DEI is good. So taking it away is seen as a loss to us. Though, when you research deeper on the issue, you find out that it was mainly good for White women, and it was not accomplishing anything near what its stated purpose is suppose to be.
We need policies tailored to help our particular issues, but unfortunately at the moment neither party has the desire nor will to do that. For the Democrats, every policy they make stating it will help us, is always diluted with measures to make sure there is a backdoor that allows the policy to actually help others more. As for the Republicans, well they do not feel the need to even fake the funk about the issue, and will just tell us to build our own. (Which WS will seek to destroy if our own becomes too successful in uplifting us).
Still, in the end, the true solution is to uplift ourselves no matter the costs. As long as we are waiting on those who benefit from our present circumstances to do it, we will always receive little to no support in doing it. It will always be just window dressing to mullify the masses who are not apt to look any deeper than the surface.
King_Kamala61
TheColi's Favorite Artist
fukk dat Pugsley ass bytch
OperationNumbNutts
Superstar
You hit on some good points.
Racist, white supremacy, etc are all rooted to one thing. It's about preserving resources for themselves. Moving federal agencies to the mid-west is one of those initiatives. One thing they are great doing is rebranding and ultimately seeking the same outcome.OperationNumbNutts
Superstar
Nah............Too many are willing to kiss the ring. We are evening seeing Jim Clyburn who is a Dems starting to kiss the ring. Republicans including some Democrats will have no problem moving agencies to their districts.
