D'Angelo Russell traded to the Nets for Brook Lopez & 27th pick

Sterling Archer

Spider Mane
Supporter
Joined
May 16, 2012
Messages
34,935
Reputation
10,828
Daps
171,351
Reppin
Chicago
Why not just offer dlo and mozgov fukking bytches the pacers could've picked up his rookie contract this shyt was fixed on God and heaven
Because they'll get better offers than fukking Deangelo Russell for Paul George. And won't have to have a black hole in Mozgov to do it. You'd be a horrible GM nikka.

:mjlol:
 

Rekkapryde

GT, LWO, 49ERS, BRAVES, HAWKS, N4O...yeah UMAD!
Supporter
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
148,538
Reputation
26,489
Daps
499,239
Reppin
TYRONE GA!
WAS THIS THE fukkIN BEST WE COULD DO TO GET RID OF MOZZY'S CONTRACT????
f84899b79213b34fa985a720106a7954.gif
 

AVXL

Laughing at you n*ggaz like “ha ha ha”
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
40,851
Reputation
645
Daps
76,393
Reppin
Of course the ATL
They're banking on LeBron. fukk waiting on that wish washy ass nikka. PG wants to be here now. I don't like DLo much but he's worth more than a salary dump. If you're banking on Bron and PG playing here next year based on their word it's stupid AF

Breh y'all cleared room for Lonzo to come in & start Day 1, got a legit, All Star level C and picked up another first rounder. Your team got better and before you add PG or Bron you gotta have a squad around them. Y'all gotta have some perspective



I hate that yall got me caping for Russell but this was a bad trade :scust:


Ball's ceiling is higher than Russell tho so in the grand scheme of things who cares about those Russell stats. Lakers got better today and will be better after Thurs night
 

Loose

Retired Legend
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
44,021
Reputation
2,191
Daps
129,079
Why would he get rid of Ingram when ingram has shown more potential than dlo? Breh :hhh:
i personally don't think Ingram will be shyt and yall should move on. i would have attached the pick to mozgov and moved baxk even if that meant 15th
 
Top