DEEPER rooted than many of you think
A Lightskin women with her features would be considered a "baddie": 'Oh Look at you dap fishing, militant, militant, hotep rah rah
"
No Negro we aint even gonna play that game, we already know the deal is, the further a black women is from close to white (the ones "yall" supposedly claim oppresses "yall" and sought to fight back against go figure
but still procreate and fornicate with but shhhh) the less pretty she is deemed, less feminine she is deemed (a shine in here called her a man) and less fair treatment shes accustomed to. Which me brings to the point of, when it comes to judging
black women, we as black men (
not all) look through dark rose tinted white supremacist glasses and perpetuate it subconsciously, thinking the lighter (close to white)the better :white mans ice is colder etc. So, its almost futile tryna debate if a brown hued female is pretty or not because some of us wearing them Cactiers. But this was preset ever since bobble head, pot belly
west African chieftains allowed
Europeans to come in, infiltrate, slavery, colonialism etc, leading to brainwashing and conditioning to where we think less of ourselves, particularly our unique God given features we have: our hair is no good, nappy, nose wide and ugly, bubble lip name calling, skin too dark etc. So we collectively hold a mirror to ourselves and we see THEIR features and think we are not good enough only because we where
conditioned to think so. So this then rounds back to if a black women has features(mainly facial) that are not close to whiteness (again the ones "yall" claim to hate because they oppress you
but still procreate and fornicate with but shhhhh) her ratings go down.
PS, miss me with hotep, militant stuff