Could’ve had bothThat would be in the same time period as a lot of the HBK vs Bret stuff, so we would've missed out on that
I'd rather have that and all the fukkery its given us over the years than HBK vs Savage as a long term feud
Could’ve had bothThat would be in the same time period as a lot of the HBK vs Bret stuff, so we would've missed out on that
I'd rather have that and all the fukkery its given us over the years than HBK vs Savage as a long term feud
HBK didn’t feud with Bret for the title til 96. Savage and HBK could’ve wrapped up their feud right on time for HBK to still beat Bret at WM 96. Maybe they would have to shorten the feud a bit but it would’ve been the perfect setup for HBK to become champ.That would be in the same time period as a lot of the HBK vs Bret stuff, so we would've missed out on that
I'd rather have that and all the fukkery its given us over the years than HBK vs Savage as a long term feud
Right. Jerry (who was older than Randy) and Bret essentially had the same feud during that time. They could've made it work.Could’ve had both
"So what happened? Pat Patterson says, 'well Randy, we're having a youth movement and the best thing you can do is to stay on the microphone.'"
That would be in the same time period as a lot of the HBK vs Bret stuff, so we would've missed out on that
I'd rather have that and all the fukkery its given us over the years than HBK vs Savage as a long term feud
HBK/Bret is the most important feud in pro-wrestling history brehHBK/Bret was not a good feud.
and they nearly drove the WWF into bankruptcy.
they always hype up that weak ass iron-man bout but never mention how the arena was half-empty during their match.