Could wwe do a all women show every week?

[Dog Based Gremlin]

fukk no.

The on-screen product simply isn't good enough top to bottom to warrant a show. Some of the women in WWE downright embarrass the business on most nights.

Would be a terrible look.

 

[DANJ!]

They should do Evolution in March for Women's History instead of that throwaway Fast Lane. The men can flesh out their issues on tv to make the weekly more important before WM.

As far as a weekly women's show they might as well try. They tried CWs, luchas, and the Divas show does well on E. Incorporate more of that fukkery into a rasslin show. Instead of a show about rasslin. Do they have women writers? I never hear about women high up in these creative roles outside of Steph.

I think they actually use women specifically for the female-based storylines. But yeah it's not the craziest idea ever... obviously it's not gonna work for smarky people who love their workrate nshyt, but I'd say that with enough drama, fukkery, and fighting, it'd attract a bunch of female viewers.

 

[The Solid One]

No!

 

[PlainSight]

They could do it, but it probably wouldn't be very good. Not because of a lack of talent - there's a lot of very good women in the company now. But because it would just be another terribly booked show from WWE. It's not a good idea.

I think they should just do a bi-annual all women's PPV. Only need 2 of them a year a la Evolution.

 

[Playaz Eyez]

Based on the amount of women they have on the roster, I don’t see a reason why they haven’t already.

 

[Rell Lauren]

No. The gap between the good women and the rest is big. You'd run the risk of overexposure if you keep the big guns out there to cover up for the flawed female talent.

 

[WHolla09]

Should do it for the Nxt women. They have so many talented women on the bench, like Santana Garrett, that need something to do

 

[Mʀ2ᴋDᴇᴇᴢ]

Besides Naomi, Bayley, Sasha and Bianca I dont really care for the rest so no


Even then I wouldnt watch, hell dont even watch weekly now

 

[Reality Check]

No. The gap between the good women and the rest is big. You'd run the risk of overexposure if you keep the big guns out there to cover up for the flawed female talent.

Having an all women's show where they could get reps in (and not be limited to 2-3 minute matches) could be beneficial with helping them develop and get better.

 

[Rell Lauren]

Having an all women's show where they could get reps in (and not be limited to 2-3 minute matches) could be beneficial with helping them develop and get better.

It's one hell of a Catch 22 though. Do you want to make your product look bad while giving them time and exposure to work out of being green?

 

[LastManStanding]

Yes if done correctly and they feature a good mix of wrestling, story lines, and sex appeal. Some of the highest rated and most watched YouTube segments feature the women in non-wrestling segments.

However, a show based strictly just on the wrestling wouldn’t succeed.

 

[Amare's Right Hook]

I would watch WAY more.

 

[RammerJammer]

the best women are better than the best men rn

an all-woman show would suck because once you get past the couple of GOAT-tier female wrestlers, the rest of them range from "supbar" (Charlotte/Becky/Rhea tier) to "legit can't wrestle" (Mandy Rose/Nia Jax tier)

the presentation would be cringey AF too

My main beef with ESPN's women's Basketball coverage, out here treating it like it's the damn special Olympics.

 

[Him]

1 hour show on peacock sure

Came in to say this. A one hour show on Peacock would be the only way for it to work in theory. How would they go about the titles tho? SD, RAW, and NXT all have women's tag titles and single titles now. Knowing WWE they would try to introduce more titles exclusive to that brand.

 

[TRIPLE M]

They could but they should combine the rosters and unify the belts, can’t have the same people wrestling each other
Bring back Velocity and rebrand it as women’s show , 1hr