How about you eat a bag of covid infested dikks. Fukk you, your family and your kids(they should've been swallowed). Your illiterate ass needs hooked on phonics
Aziz Sheikh, professor of primary care research & development at the University of Edinburgh, drove home the point in a briefing that the risk is considerably higher if someone contracted the virus. For example, the risk of low platelets (thrombocytopenia) is nearly nine times higher with a COVID-19 infection than with the Oxford/AstraZeneca vaccine in the eight to 28 days post-vaccination. That's comparable to the risk from a flu vaccine, he said.
In cases of ischemic stroke, the risk is nearly 12 times higher after a COVID-19 infection than after the BioNTech/Pfizer jab.
This effort is the largest study to look at this question, and unlike other studies that often look at only one vaccine, these researchers compared two jabs side by side. Peter English, a retired consultant in communicable disease control and former editor of Vaccines in Practice, described the study as “very important.”
The report comes on the heels of a study published in the New England Journal of Medicine this week using Israeli data on the rollout of the BioNTech/Pfizer vaccine. It found that while the vaccine increased the risk of heart inflammation, the risk was higher among those infected with the virus.
MORE FROM ... ASHLEIGH FURLONG
Directly above the paragraph you are quoting was this paragraph:
If you follow the link, it will take you to the actual study itself.The results of the study, published in the British Medical Journal Friday, found that the Oxford/AstraZeneca vaccine is tied to an increased risk of low platelets and blood clots in veins. For the BioNTech/Pfizer vaccine, there’s an increased risk of an ischaemic stroke and blood clots in arteries.
Once there, you can read it for yourself.
This graph shows the population of the study:
As you can clearly see, the study was only conducted on people who had received the vaccine.
That's what "Population: 29.1 million people vaccinated with first doses in England" means.
It means that for this study, the authors looked at 29.1 million people in England who had received the first dose of the vaccine.
Every finding from this study could (for people who are slow on the uptake, such as yourself) be preceded by that statement.
So when you quoted some big block of text from the article interpreting the study for you, you'll see statements like this:
For example, the risk of low platelets (thrombocytopenia) is nearly nine times higher with a COVID-19 infection than with the Oxford/AstraZeneca vaccine in the eight to 28 days post-vaccination.
What that means is that the risk of thrombocytopenia is nine times higher for the vaccinated when they get COVID than it is for the vaccinated in the period 28 days post-vaccination.
What this study really shows is: for the vaccinated, there is a 900% increase in the likelihood of developing thrombocytopenia following a COVID infection.
The likelihood of this happening for the unvaccinated is as it has always been--extremely low, and extremely rare. They don't need to study my risk of thrombocytopenia, because I have done nothing to change my risk factors for thrombocytopenia. I am the control group, and my risk for thrombocytopenia is exactly as it has always been.