Kane/Undertaker was good though
Watch Cornette's timeline. He gives many instances of how Russo's booking fukked up the original plans for Kane/Taker to be seperated until Wrestlemania (or atleast for a longer period of time). The original plans sounded better imo.
I think we cannot take away credit from Russo for the work he did during the Attitude era. However, I do not believe that Russo is the sole creator of many of the big ideas. It was a combination of a group effort and just having talented guys (e.g. Rock, SCSA, Foley).
I also do not think we should romanticize the Attitude Era. It had it's amazing highs, but also it's terrible lows. Some of the storys were just really out there if you go back and watch it.
Clearly Russo did not start the downfall of WCW. Obviously he inherited some problems from the past, as do many leaders. But under his watch he still fukked up a lot of things. So while he may not be the sole reason for WCW's demise, he contributed to it.
Cornette isn't perfect. One poster earlier stated he can pinpoint the problems of the business in a shoot interview but in practice he repeats his own flaws. I totally agree with this. His time may have passed also, but I believe he can still contribute it some ways.
I believe both Cornette and Russo are both useful, in a controlled environment.
Just my 2 cents
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/eb9c6/eb9c6cbcd09e7f53c7c78349e84a8b8e1c67422a" alt="manny :manny: :manny:"
.