Type Username Here
Not a new member
I like Indiana's law that was proposed. If a police officer is on your property without the proper legal right and authority, you can treat him/her as a criminal (which at that point they are). Therefore, under that proposed law, self-defense on your property is justifiable and if you were to properly defend yourself, the state should not pay for the criminal cop's benefits, health care, or whatever they are entitled to because he was committing a criminal act.
But truth be told, we don't even need the Indiana law. That's what the 2nd, 3rd (I would argue that it should extend to police officers) and 4th Amendments are for.
