Comcast considering selling its NBC Sports Regional Networks; Sinclair is bidding

Will NBC RSNs be sold to Sinclair? Even with their bad financials?


  • Total voters
    11
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
179,431
Reputation
22,444
Daps
586,578
Reppin
49ers..Braves..Celtics
Highly suggest y'all do your research on Sinclair. Prepare for subtle (and not so subtle) right wing hits mixed in with your sports coverage

They let everything die too. i remember when they bought up ROH wrestling.. it was popular at the time even though it was niche but growing.. All Sinclair did was place them on bad syndicated TV spots and call it a day. Now they are pretty much a dead company.
 

FAH1223

Go Wizards, Go Terps, Go Packers!
Staff member
Supporter
Joined
May 16, 2012
Messages
72,026
Reputation
8,192
Daps
218,050
Reppin
WASHINGTON, DC
Here's the full WSJ article:

NBCUniversal has explored putting its regional sports channels on the streaming service Peacock or selling them off, as the company tries to figure out a future for a business under increasing stress, people familiar with the situation said.

Early this spring, NBCUniversal planned to start streaming NBC Sports Philadelphia, which broadcasts the city’s pro basketball, baseball and hockey games, the people said. The goal was to be up and running in time for the Major League Baseball season that began in April.

The plan was halted over concerns that it would conflict with the broader streaming strategy of NBCUniversal, a unit of Comcast Corp. , the people said.

NBCUniversal is still considering options for streaming its sports channels on Peacock, the people familiar with the situation said. The company also is exploring whether to sell off the networks and sees the teams associated with them as potential buyers, some of the people said. Teams often hold an equity stake in the networks that air their games.

Regional sports channels were once an engine of growth and profit for media companies, because of the high fees owners were able to charge cable and satellite TV providers to distribute them. Now, the business is eroding as consumers cancel pay-TV subscriptions or switch to traditional or online packages that don’t include the sports networks.

In 2020, regional sports networks collectively had 145.8 million subscribers, down 23% from 190.2 million in 2014, according to S&P Global Market Intelligence. The pandemic pummeled the industry. More than $1 billion in rebates were given to pay-TV subscribers when leagues paused their seasons, according to S&P.
b7bdd6bc991abc474680caba348e86a703f5d15a.png

Meanwhile, some channels are on the hook to pay billions of dollars of media-rights fees annually, meaning they will face a financial squeeze in coming years.

Building streaming businesses has become a popular option for traditional TV networks. Sinclair Broadcast Group Inc. , owner of the Fox Sports family of regional sports channels—rebranded as Bally Sports in a licensing deal with casino operator Bally’s Corp. —plans to sell streaming subscriptions for 19 of its networks, with an aim to launch in 2022.

One major challenge for the networks is to build an audience for their streaming apps without jeopardizing their traditional TV business. “In the short term, does this cannibalize some of these other cable-TV subscriptions, which are very profitable?” said Rose Oberman, an analyst at S&P.

The economics of streaming will be tough. In traditional cable-TV, households pay for many channels in their bundle that they don’t watch. In direct-to-consumer streaming, only the people who want to watch sign up and pay, so networks will likely need to set a much higher price in order to collect the same revenue as they do on cable.

The sports world is moving toward streaming, gradually but inexorably. Amazon.com Inc. will stream a package of National Football League games exclusively starting in the 2022-2023 season, under a deal reached with the league. Walt Disney Co.’s ESPN has been investing in its ESPN+ service, which also will add a few NFL games and stream some National Hockey League games.

Regional sports channels are under more pressure to adapt, because they have been hit harder by cord-cutting than bigger cable channels and face high costs. Collectively, regional sports channels spend more than $4 billion yearly on sports rights fees, according to consulting firm Octagon Sports and Entertainment Network.

Under the plan NBCUniversal was developing for its local sports channels, in addition to having them available on pay-TV providers in a given region, the channels would be added to Peacock, a streaming service that carries an array of the company’s TV shows and movies.

Philadelphia was a natural choice for the test market because Comcast is based there. NBC Sports Philadelphia is profitable, but it may not be as early as next year and has long-term media-rights deals that will require it to pay billions of dollars in the coming years, a person familiar with its finances said.

NBCUniversal, which operates seven regional sports networks, doesn’t break out financial results for them.

If the plan had moved forward, fans in the Philadelphia market would be able to stream the local teams’ games. To offer the games to fans outside Philadelphia, NBCUniversal would need permission from leagues, which have their own apps offering such “out of market” viewing.

One issue for executives at the company was pricing, people familiar with the situation said. Peacock subscribers in Philadelphia would have to pay more for the service than Peacock subscribers in markets without a regional sports network, a situation the executives feared would confuse the service’s marketing, the people said.

For NBCUniversal, selling the networks to teams has proven challenging because teams haven’t emerged as serious bidders in recent auctions of sports networks.

Sinclair, the largest owner of regional sports networks in the U.S., is working on offering two streaming tiers, one without games but with content associated with the teams and another at a higher price that would show live games, Chief Executive Chris Ripley said in an interview.

“Look at how much fandom is outside of the pay-TV bundle—it’s quite significant and it’s been growing faster over the last couple of years,” Mr. Ripley said. “We think there’s millions and millions of subscribers just for our service alone.” Sinclair’s sports networks had 52 million subscribers in late 2020.

Pricing has yet to be decided for Sinclair’s regional sports networks, but analysts and industry experts estimate an individual channel with live games could cost $30 or more a month.

Sinclair placed a big bet on regional sports channels in 2019 when it acquired a group of Fox-branded networks from Walt Disney. in a deal valued at $10.6 billion including roughly $8 billion in debt.

At the time of the acquisition, Sinclair didn’t signal plans to get into streaming, instead focusing on the potential of the traditional TV business. But Covid-19 accelerated the deterioration of the networks. The company’s debtholders began to consider a restructuring of its hefty debt load, given the mounting pressure, The Wall Street Journal previously reported.

The Sinclair channels remain profitable, but analysts say it is only a matter of time before they start losing money. The company last year wrote down $4.2 billion on the sports networks.

Sinclair’s goal is to make regional channels’ existing Bally Sports streaming apps—which can be accessed by people with a pay-TV subscription—available to cord-cutters, Mr. Ripley said.
Sinclair’s Mr. Ripley said the goal isn’t to upend the pay-TV model, but complement it and reach cord-cutters.

“I don’t see this system with the pay-TV distributors collapsing, I see it evolving and the structure changing,” said Patrick Crakes, a sports media consultant.
 

FAH1223

Go Wizards, Go Terps, Go Packers!
Staff member
Supporter
Joined
May 16, 2012
Messages
72,026
Reputation
8,192
Daps
218,050
Reppin
WASHINGTON, DC
If Comcast decides to sell regional sports networks, these buyers make the most sense - CNBC

By Jabari Young @JABARIJYOUNG
  • NBCUniversal, the parent company of CNBC, is reportedly considering selling its regional sports networks, according to The Wall Street Journal.
  • If it does, potential buyers like private investment firms and sports owners could benefit.
106882173-1620849408525-gettyimages-945449074-DBK1804110002_REDS_AT_PHILLIES.jpeg

Baseball gloves waiting for action above the NBC Sports Philadelphia logo before the MLB game between the Cincinnati Reds and the Philadelphia Phillies on April 11, 2018 at Citizens Bank Park in Philadelphia PA.
Gavin Baker | Icon Sportswire | Getty Images


Give legendary sports owner Ed Snider credit – he was one of the first to see the business opportunity around regional sports networks.

Snider combined a regional sports network and movie channel in 1976 when he launched PRISM. If you’re a longtime Philadelphian, you remember the network well. PRISM was an extra cable charge. The channel aired the National Hockey League’s Flyers franchise and the National Basketball Association’s 76ers.

Major League Baseball’s Phillies games were also shown on the network, which eventually turned into NBC Sports Philadelphia, one of the few RSNs operated by NBCUniversal parent company, Comcast.

“To me, Ed Snider is definitely in the top 10 of all-time, pure sports visionaries,” said former sports executive Andy Dolich. “Did he see everything 100 percent? Probably not. But he saw the buildings. He saw the teams. He saw the fanbases, especially in Philadelphia, and he saw the crazy DNA that fans have for the teams. And he was able to organize it in a strategic fashion.”

Last week, the Wall Street Journal reported Comcast is exploring selling its stakes and exiting the RSN business, which it got into with the help of Snider, the former chairman of Comcast-Spectator. The speculation shouldn’t be too much a surprise as cord-cutting continues, and RSNs rely on cable subscribers. AT&T has been trying to sell its stash of RSN’s, too.

Dolich said RSNs were once “the best sports microscopes – meaning, you could find out everything, tune in during the day and get information about the local franchise. Now it’s flipped and becoming a telescope where fans want to see the big picture.”

“They don’t need the small picture,” he added. “It’s who won, who lost, and seeing highlights of Steph Curry going for 49 points. That’s all they care about. All the other stuff, they can get in many different forms on their phone, laptop, iPad, etc.”

If NBCUniversal decides to auction some of its RSNs, a few names and companies are circulating as intriguing buyers in the sports business world. And they include sports owners who could expand what Snider helped build.

Owning the railroad tracks
Back in 1976, Snider bet local fanbases would pay to watch teams. He died in 2016, but not before he and Comcast won that bet. Fans no longer need to rely solely on RSNs to reach sports leagues, now that there are lots of streaming options.

Though the WSJ report noted that sports owners have historically been uninterested in owning RSNs, that could change. The RSN traditionists suggest the model isn’t dead, but in need of innovation.

Apollo Global Management co-founder Josh Harris is an interesting name who’s linked to the NBC Sports Philly operation. To those familiar with his business dealings, Harris likes to explore and take risks. NBC Sports Philly could make perfect sense.

He owns the 76ers, which he purchased from Comcast-Spectator in 2011, and though separate from his personal balance sheet, Apollo purchased Verizon properties earlier this month, including Yahoo, for $5 billion.

Whether Comcast sells the property is the question. When reached on Tuesday, an NBC affiliate stations spokesperson declined to comment on the WSJ report but said the company is in a strong position with profitable RSNs.

In Washington, Ted Leonsis, the Wizards and Capitals owner, set up a digital RSN in the Monumental Sports Network and appears well-positioned for the future with sports gambling and esports. Since he already has a 30% stake in the NBC Sports Washington property, he aligns as a suitor to own the network outright. (@mastermind @JACK! @Black @lochead @L&HH @Blackrogue)

Dolich suggested team owners should look to buy RSN properties to prepare for what’s ahead, like virtual reality and augmented reality. He linked it to owning the railroad tracks.

“If you look at the billionaires of railroads 100 years ago, what did they control? They controlled the railroad tracks,” Dolich said. “So in this circumstance, what do the owners of a sports team have? They have the property, the athletes and the games.

“Fans want control,” Dolich added. “They want to be in the game. And how many ways can you follow your team? It’s hundreds. Owners, they can set the kind of tracks they want for people to view the game.”

Added Octagon media executive Dan Cohen: “You get synergy between the team and content production and engagement with fans. If you’re able to merge the data you have on people that come to the arena with your viewership audience, that’s some really strong currency to trade on. There is value in that.”

RedBird Capital could consider Boston RSN
Investment firm RedBird Capital has a minority stake in Fenway Sports Group (FSG), the ownership group of the Red Sox and Liverpool FC. RedBird also has a stake in the media sector as an investor of YES Network, the RSN that airs Yankees games.

RedBird could explore buying NBC Sports Boston, consolidating and transforming the station to align with New England Sports Network (NESN), which already airs Red Sox and Bruins games.

“It’s a very strong market with a strong fanbase and it’s profitable,” Cohen said of the Boston RSN.

RedBird declined to comment on the matter when reached by CNBC on Tuesday.

105106707-GettyImages-941498830.jpg

The headquarters of the Sinclair Broadcast Group in Hunt Valley, Maryland.
Getty Images


Is Sinclair an option?

Sinclair made a massive bet on RSNs when it purchased 21 networks from Disney in 2019 for $10.6 billion, making it the largest RSN provider. Media pundits are still unsure about the move, and Sinclair needed to write down over $4 billion in debt associated with the acquisition.

In March, Sinclair officially rebranded the networks to Bally Sports under a deal with Bally’s Corporation. That could alienate marketing dollars from rival sports betting firms, which are still spending wildly to grow brands.

But the company is positioned well to capitalize on sports wagering and sources, who wish to remain anonymous due to ongoing talks, say it’s close to renewing the NBA’s and NHL’s local streaming rights, which will benefit their direct-to-consumer streaming model via the Bally Sports app.

Sinclair has a $2.5 billion market capitalization and can’t afford to purchase the entire fleet of NBC RSNs. And anti-trust concerns, which forced Disney to unload the properties, would arise, too. But gaining a stake in one more RSN market wouldn’t hurt.

“It could make sense,” Lee Berke of LHB Sports, a sports media consultancy firm, said. “There may be specific markets that are adjunct to markets they already have and increase their national footprint.”

Keeping an eye on Amazon
In the San Francisco Bay Area, another profitable NBC RSN has rights to the Golden State Warriors, Giants, Oakland A’s and 49ers shoulder programming. Cohen mentioned tech giant Amazon as a perfect suitor should NBC sell the property.

“If I’m Amazon and getting a taste of the RSN fruit with YES Network, my next move would be to go make a splash in Silicon Valley,” Cohen said. “They’d have Steph Curry for a few more years, and the Giants, which has a good fanbase. It’s a good market.”

It’s down, but the RSN business isn’t dead yet, and if NBC exits, there should be buyers willing to invest and experiment, especially with top sports markets available.

“As far out as you can see in the future, RSNs will still be a part of the game,” said former Turner Sports president Dr. Harvey Schiller. “It’s all about the content they provide to the viewer. Regionals have to come up with other things they can offer as part of it, and it’s probably going to be gambling and gaming,” he added. “If they align that with their product – that’s the future.”

Disclosure: Comcast is the owner of NBCUniversal, the parent company of CNBC.
 
Joined
May 9, 2012
Messages
1,111
Reputation
10
Daps
2,423
Reppin
Miami Beach, the 305
Get they shyt together and bring this shyt back to YouTubeTV and others. I nearly went back to cable over this bs but fuk Sinclair. I was willing to give it a year before they got right. Let’s hope this is the first of many dominos falling
 

rantanamo

All Star
Joined
Jun 7, 2012
Messages
4,370
Reputation
490
Daps
8,017
Reppin
NULL
fukk Sinclair. Can't even watch local teams anymore in Dallas unless you have a specific carrier. Will be worse when they launch their stand alone service. So we will only be able to see Mavs and Rangers if we get that bullshyt.
 

Absolut

Legal Bookie
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
15,250
Reputation
530
Daps
53,769
Reppin
Las Vegas
We aren’t very far away from sports leagues partnering with betting platforms and showing the games thru the betting apps/site with live betting options right next to the live game feed
 

lochead

All Star
Joined
May 14, 2012
Messages
1,461
Reputation
621
Daps
3,507
Reppin
I'm from where Petey come from
In Washington, Ted Leonsis, the Wizards and Capitals owner, set up a digital RSN in the Monumental Sports Network and appears well-positioned for the future with sports gambling and esports. Since he already has a 30% stake in the NBC Sports Washington property, he aligns as a suitor to own the network outright. (@mastermind @JACK! @Black @lochead @L&HH @Blackrogue)

Man if Uncle Ted gets totally control… :snoop:

I might have to switch teams :mjcry:
 

Anerdyblackguy

Gotta learn how to kill a nikka from the inside
Supporter
Joined
Oct 19, 2015
Messages
61,206
Reputation
17,195
Daps
342,660
So with NBC sports collapsing how many more sports networks are going to make it? Only CBS & ESPN are hanging in there
 

Morethan1

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
49,698
Reputation
10,652
Daps
159,843
Reppin
Midwest
Sinclair is trying to develop an Bally Sports streaming service that would cost 20 bucks, it’s smart to get more RSNs if that is their goal. Comcast is basically focusing mostly on NFL, EPL, Golf, IndyCar, and the Olympics on their sports department for the time being as Peacock is their main concern.


I understand other people problems with it but I understand Sinclair wanting all rsn under one roof
 
Top