Colombian president says cocaine 'no worse than whisky'

⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐

Superstar
Joined
Jan 29, 2014
Messages
8,394
Reputation
184
Daps
14,551
He's hundred percent correct, it's self-evident and blatantly obvious to anyone with any sense and experience but most peoples experience with cocaine amounts to a cheesy joke and perhaps a friend who once did a key bump of baking soda in the bathroom
 

⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐

Superstar
Joined
Jan 29, 2014
Messages
8,394
Reputation
184
Daps
14,551
"I can't handle drugs, my limits are the proper measure of limitations for everyone else" - :wrist: (how you look when you start supporting the war on drugs because you think "drugs are dangerous" :pacspit:)
 

Swirv

Superstar
Supporter
Joined
Jul 1, 2012
Messages
17,304
Reputation
2,921
Daps
54,575

Findings​

MCDA modelling showed that heroin, crack cocaine, and metamfetamine were the most harmful drugs to individuals (part scores 34, 37, and 32, respectively), whereas alcohol, heroin, and crack cocaine were the most harmful to others (46, 21, and 17, respectively). Overall, alcohol was the most harmful drug (overall harm score 72), with heroin (55) and crack cocaine (54) in second and third places.
Sounds like meth should be legalized instead
 

Capitol

Did this work
Joined
Jun 21, 2012
Messages
15,078
Reputation
1,906
Daps
35,534
I do remember seeing a study that cheese and white sugar were more addicting than some "street drugs" actually. Alcoholics have been acting like straight deviants, but it's legal.and normalized so people don't bat an eye:patrice:
 
Last edited:

⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐

Superstar
Joined
Jan 29, 2014
Messages
8,394
Reputation
184
Daps
14,551
The war on drugs is an ineffective policy that hurts more than it helps and to be committed to it represents the blatant support of tyranny and opposition to everything that personal liberty and freedom stand for
A country engaged in a war on drugs is a country engaged in a war on its own people ... and a war on freedom. The war on drugs is an ineffective policy that acts as economic protectionism for those engaged in the criminal element, in that sense it is a counterproductive policy ..
The war on drugs hurts more than it helps. It endangers citizens, emboldens the criminal element, inflates crime rates domestically, and the exportation of these policies acts as de-facto economic protectionism for violent cartels who reek havoc in their respective homelands

The war on drugs acts as economic protectionism for those engaged in the criminal element, counterproductively enabling the profiteering of the very culprits it swears to take down

it also subjects drug users to black market conditions, denying basic consumer protections

Put simply, the war on drugs amounts to economic protectionism for violent cartels that are able to profit within the parameters set by these ineffective laws. Domestically these laws inflate our crime rates while limiting consumer protections



"But drugs are bad, I couldn't handle them" you people saying this are an example of the worst of the worst because you know so little about a subject and you have such little experience in that field but yet your limited experience and emotionally arrived position is what you think is a good basis for legislating the rights of other people. UltraCac behavior, basically Karens - :wrist: :pacspit:
 
Top