The war on drugs is an ineffective policy that hurts more than it helps and to be committed to it represents the blatant support of tyranny and opposition to everything that personal liberty and freedom stand for
A country engaged in a war on drugs is a country engaged in a war on its own people ... and a war on freedom. The war on drugs is an ineffective policy that acts as economic protectionism for those engaged in the criminal element, in that sense it is a counterproductive policy ..
The war on drugs hurts more than it helps. It endangers citizens, emboldens the criminal element, inflates crime rates domestically, and the exportation of these policies acts as de-facto economic protectionism for violent cartels who reek havoc in their respective homelands
The war on drugs acts as economic protectionism for those engaged in the criminal element, counterproductively enabling the profiteering of the very culprits it swears to take down
it also subjects drug users to black market conditions, denying basic consumer protections
Put simply, the war on drugs amounts to economic protectionism for violent cartels that are able to profit within the parameters set by these ineffective laws. Domestically these laws inflate our crime rates while limiting consumer protections
"But drugs are bad, I couldn't handle them" you people saying this are an example of the worst of the worst because you know so little about a subject and you have such little experience in that field but yet your limited experience and emotionally arrived position is what you think is a good basis for legislating the rights of other people. UltraCac behavior, basically Karens -
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2e031/2e031f8cb3c8042c63ce4b17ebc40c4390a71d54" alt="pacspit :pacspit: :pacspit:"