After getting my legs cut off year after year, I must say it's frustrating as hell to see you say that now
As I've said, you're right
After getting my legs cut off year after year, I must say it's frustrating as hell to see you say that now
This is totally wrongheaded. Most legitimate/big money/expert leagues are run without vetoes.
Collusion and clear errors are the only veto worthy situations. "Unfair" deals are not. Trying to get over on another owner is the best part of fantasy. The entirety of the league trying to protect others dion dumb moves....or their own position....has no place in serious leagues
Every big money league I have been in has had league vote on trades to prevent unfair trades and keep things honest. You will always have a couple of idiots that will veto everything out of spite... I only veto unfair trades... And I've been in leagues where it's $250 buy-in's per team...
agree to disagree that all owners of teams shouldn't have a say if a trade is unfair
agreedThere should be a league vote on any rule changes
That's how we've always done it and even when we've voted on favor of something like the two NA spots it still wasn't changed
All of which are worthless to me.Why don't you send me an offer instead and tell me what you want
Ozuna, lemahiu, iglesias, castillo, obrien and swihart are available
All of which are worthless to me.
Lol dude you're so delusional. I view those assets as negative value because I've gotta do something with them. And I know very well that nobody else wants them. So it dilutes what I actually want, which is picks.There are draft picks in play too depending on the quality of the player id be receiving
Got a few deals that are close so I'd appreciate it if you have any serious offers to send them fast
Thank you sir and enjoy your friday
Lol dude you're so delusional. I view those assets as negative value because I've gotta do something with them. And I know very well that nobody else wants them. So it dilutes what I actually want, which is picks.
Hes not even an offensive prospect tho
Every big money league I have been in has had league vote on trades to prevent unfair trades and keep things honest. You will always have a couple of idiots that will veto everything out of spite... I only veto unfair trades... And I've been in leagues where it's $250 buy-in's per team...
agree to disagree that all owners of teams shouldn't have a say if a trade is unfair
I'm gonna throw a real life scenario at you.Those are a rarity, from what I've seen. Why would a league where everyone is putting up $250 need to worry about unfair trades?
What's unfair to many may not be to the two in the deal, like the Trout deal. Out of context it looks ridiculous, but it was with a full understanding, by both owners, of the implications. They both paid, and sone they weren't colluding, they should be allowed to run their team however they want.
The problem with vetoes is that people vote selfishly. They don't necessarily vote the trade as patently unfair, but rather unfair to them and damaging to their individual chances. That is not a valid reason for a veto.
It should take 12.If we have 14 teams it should take 10 teams to veto not 6.