But neither have you. You seem to be placing a lot of faith on the full report.
Nobody wants Trump impeached more than me, but I’m done being Charlie Brown with the football.
Cold War II: The United States vs Trump and Co. A Russian Affair
- Thread starter LeVraiPapi
- Start date
But neither have you. You seem to be placing a lot of faith on the full report.
Nobody wants Trump impeached more than me, but I’m done being Charlie Brown with the football.
The daily swing of emotions in this thread 
Poetical Poltergeist
Precise and cold hearted
Crazy times.The daily swing of emotions in this thread
i remember saying for a while "what the fukk is collusion, and when is the left gonna define what it means"
in hindsight, it might have served them better to actually do that
in hindsight, it might have served them better to actually do that
The daily swing of emotions in this thread
all the mediums on YouTube said he is going down
Hood Critic
The Power Circle
I really wish someone would do a special about this...collusion was never something Democrats started. The guilty framed it as collusion when all of this started, instead of what it really is, conspiracy. That was intentional but the media and everyone else was too tender to correct them, as "collusion" isn't even a legal term.i remember saying for a while "what the fukk is collusion, and when is the left gonna define what it means"
in hindsight, it might have served them better to actually do that
im gonna have to strongly disagree with this post
what really happened was shell shock from hillary losing. and that led to "well there must have been some reason", which led to "russian collusion". a vague, bullshyt term which didnt really mean anything, and was never going to be proven to have swung the election
do you disagree with any of that? and if so, what stopped the dems from saying "it's not 'collusion' we're after. it's *insert concise and specific term and definition*"
is any of that incorrect?
Hood Critic
The Power Circle
I disagree with your "shell shock" reasoning since Lawfare dug into this and it was actually the Washington Examiner (a conservative publication) who first introduced the term when referring to Manafort and Jr. denying Robby Mooks claims.im gonna have to strongly disagree with this post
what really happened was shell shock from hillary losing. and that led to "well there must have been some reason", which led to "russian collusion". a vague, bullshyt term which didnt really mean anything, and was never going to be proven to have swung the election
do you disagree with any of that? and if so, what stopped the dems from saying "it's not 'collusion' we're after. it's *insert concise and specific term and definition*"
is any of that incorrect?
I do agree, as I stated above, that everyone including the Dems and the media were too scary to use the term conspiracy out of over cautiousness.
ExodusNirvana
Change is inevitable...
This shyt ain't over.
Hood Critic
The Power Circle
Julian Assange is the "middle-man", depending on whose hands he ends up in upon extradition to the US...there are going to be a lot of interesting headlines.