Christians make me uncomfortable

[Blackout]

What is a deity then? Whatever you redefine the term to be?

If so, why use the word deity?

Redefine? Lets go to our good ol buddy the dictionary:

http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/deity

Basically all powerful being or beings.

We according to them in the simulation we would be their creator, we would be all powerful and also would be able to intervene the universe at will.

Which basically would put us in diety status.

If its a creation it might be a bit of a reach to call us a deity to them but if we did create them and have enough technology to be considered all powerful to them then arguably we would be deitys in that scenario as well.

For all we know this god person could be a species that evolved like us but farther to the point where they can affect the universe on a mass scale.

 

[MikelArteta]

He is a troll that gets a good laugh out of post like this.

probably, just sitting here waiting for the insults and some copy and pasted google article or youtube video.

 

[☑︎#VoteDemocrat]

Ah More insults.

what you are using is silly word play, in essence you are saying you do not believe in God.

However by you proclaiming yourself as atheist, your assertion that there is No God.. that I Don't believe is the opposite of what I believe my assertion that There is a God, and I do believe.

Both assertions require justification.

Only the agnostic makes no claim at all whether God exists or not, as they believe they do not know whether there is a God or not

So all this time you are screaming atheism when in turn you are a agnostic

A+theism = lack of belief

A+knowledge = lack of knowledge.

I keep telling you this and you keep missing the fukking definition.

I'm an agnostic-atheist.

I do not know if there is a god, but I do not (based on current evidence) believe the claim you're asserting

 

[☑︎#VoteDemocrat]

Redefine? Lets go to our good ol buddy the dictionary:

http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/deity
Basically all powerful being or beings.

We according to them in the simulation we would be their creator, we would be all powerful and also would be able to intervene the universe at will.

Which basically would put us in diety status.

If its a creation it might be a bit of a reach to call us a deity to them but if we did create them and have enough technology to be considered all powerful to them then arguably we would be deitys in that scenario as well.

For all we know this god person could be a species that evolved like us but farther to the point where they can affect the universe on a mass scale.

Just because we create something doesn't mean we're all powerful.

 

[Snitchin Splatter]

This nikka @Napoleon all over the place now.

Ya want me to finish him or ya wanna do this yaselves

He has finished himself already. Allow him to keep flailing around like a fish out of water.

 

[Blackout]

Just because we create something doesn't mean we're all powerful.

So your saying that if we created a simulation those in the simulation shouldnt consider us all powerful?

Are you stupid?

 

[☑︎#VoteDemocrat]

So your saying that if we created a simulation those in the simulation shouldnt consider us all powerful?

Are you stupid?

Son, thats what YOU said.

I made NO such claim

i see no need for them to see us as "all powerful"

Just because you can do SOME thigns doesn't mean you can do ALL things.

 

[kevm3]

lol@'agnostic atheist'. That's just a get out easy pass. It's easy to criticize others but when asked about how a world of order and logic can come out of complete disorder, the answer is "well I don't profess to know everything!" But you're free to profess and ridicule others like you do.

 

[MikelArteta]

A+theism = lack of belief

A+knowledge = lack of knowledge.

I keep telling you this and you keep missing the fukking definition.

I'm an agnostic-atheist.

I do not know if there is a god, but I do not (based on current evidence) believe the claim you're asserting

ah there are the pictures, straight from google

scrolls for a insult ah there it is as wsell

so basically your letting us all know your a p*ssy atheist

 

[Blackout]

Son, thats what YOU said.

I made NO such claim

I said that we would be considered all powerful to those in the simulation. What you highlighted is the opposite of that.

Can you read?

 

[Blackout]

i see no need for them to see us as "all powerful"

Just because you can do SOME thigns doesn't mean you can do ALL things.

We would still be powerful.

The amount of power you have when you can control anything in a simulation is deity status worthy.

 

[☑︎#VoteDemocrat]

ah there are the pictures, straight from google

scrolls for a insult ah there it is as wsell

so basically your letting us all know your a p*ssy atheist

Its called being intellectually honest and consistent.

I can't claim to know, what I do not know.

The same way you can't disprove the loch ness monster, I can't disprove the existence of your god.

 

[MikelArteta]

Its called being intellectually honest and consistent.

I can't claim to know, what I do not know.

The same way you can't disprove the loch ness monster, I can't disprove the existence of your god.

really?

should i really dig up all your threads of you denying that God doesn't exist?

you went from 100% sure to now eh I'm not sure

 

[☑︎#VoteDemocrat]

We would still be powerful.

The amount of power you have when you can control anything in a simulation is deity status worthy.

You're just being incoherent.

"Power" is a relative and vapid term unless we're talking joules/second

and you're just playing with the word deity after you already showed that just because you create something it doesn't make you all powerful.

Just drop it already.

 

[Icantspell]

​