of course it is, they won championships outside of their golden age. just that is enoughI can’t argue that their history is more illustrious than the Bulls. It’s on the same level, if anything.
of course it is, they won championships outside of their golden age. just that is enoughI can’t argue that their history is more illustrious than the Bulls. It’s on the same level, if anything.
Pistons have been awful for 35 of the last 45 years
Warriors ? Really
They let the GDs in the door
Dope to see I know the exact spots you're talking about. Even got the N in your username. Can tell you got a Big dikk word to @KnickstapeCity.
Whoa why the Chicago hate i thought we was better than that famBulls have one championship era. All those other teams won titles in more than one era, so you can say they all got better history than the trash can Chicago franchise:
Boston
Detroit
Golden State
Los Angeles
Miami
Milwaukee
San Antonio
The Bulls are 59 years old. Aside from the 15-year Jordan era they've been mostly hot garbage and they weren't even great that entire 15 years, basically 10 years of real relevancy from 1988 to 1998. They been trash otherwise...
On the boss
Ayyyooooo
Whoa why the Chicago hate i thought we was better than that fam
But i get it championship wise it’s mj, and chasing a dragon since, the franchise cares more about money than wins,
if thib could find balance instead of grinding nikkas down to a nub (pause) our teams could have been even greater
scumville
Oregon
Bulls
Bears
You all ova the damn map, playa. Am I missing anyone?
That’s it, and thank you for minding my business sir
Strengthens his case for what?His topline stats with the Bulls are:
7 seasons, 19.7ppg, 3.7 rb, 6.2 ast, 3 x all-star
BUT he did win an MVP which I think strengthens his case a bit.
Even if that MVP goes to Bron that year, Rose is still the greatest guard Chicago had not named Jordan.His topline stats with the Bulls are:
7 seasons, 19.7ppg, 3.7 rb, 6.2 ast, 3 x all-star
BUT he did win an MVP which I think strengthens his case a bit.