Charles Barkley: "MLK never spoke about black rights, but about civil rights"

TAYLONDO SAMSWORTHY

Veteran
Verified
Supporter
Joined
May 18, 2012
Messages
13,612
Reputation
30,040
Daps
111,025
HR2KPXe.jpg
 

Professor Emeritus

Veteran
Poster of the Year
Supporter
Joined
Jan 5, 2015
Messages
51,330
Reputation
19,666
Daps
203,849
Reppin
the ether
Martin Luther King is one of the best things to happen to black folks when he was alive but post mortem he has been turned into one of the worst. They have turned him and his message into the image of the docile negro we should all strive to be by liberal white folks.

This what happens when you give a big dumb ass athlete a mic and tell him his opinion means something smh

By time Dr king was assassinated, he was sounding damn near more militant than malcolm lol

Time to reclaim him and his message. Especially in the times we are living in.

Yeah the last 3 or 4 years Bomani has done this and even spoken how MLK was more radical and militant than folks give him credit for (calling for boycotts and calling out the military industrial complex).

All THIS.

I've even seen it happen here in The Coli. The problem is that some people equate nonviolent activism with moderation or a lack of intense commitment. They don't realize that the intense form of nonviolent activism that Dr. King practiced, that Gandhi practiced, was far MORE committed and far more opposed to the system than most of his critics were.

Also frustrating as hell that they can't differentiate lack of hatred for the enemy with lack of hatred for the enemy's evil. Dr. King refused to hate people, but he absolutely despised the evil that people did and was far more committed to rooting it out and destroying it than almost anyone else was. Even today, a lot of the people who claim to hate White people or whoever else will turn around and act just like them, or buy into their systems, without a second thought.

MLK and his leadership worked better than just about any other leader's activism in American history. The reason that it's not happening right now isn't because anyone has tried and failed. It's because most wannabe activists and internet militants realize that it is too hard, takes too much commitment, and thus they don't want to try.

Be willing to give up the system of White supremacy. Be willing to take an economic hit in order to give them an economic hit. Be willing to get beat or go to jail or get killed for the struggle. Care THAT much, and then shyt will happen.





1. “Why is equality so assiduously avoided? Why does white America delude itself, and how does it rationalize the evil it retains?

The majority of white Americans consider themselves sincerely committed to justice for the Negro. They believe that American society is essentially hospitable to fair play and to steady growth toward a middle-class Utopia embodying racial harmony. But unfortunately this is a fantasy of self-deception and comfortable vanity.”



2. “I contend that the cry of “Black Power” is, at bottom, a reaction to the reluctance of white power to make the kind of changes necessary to make justice a reality for the Negro. I think that we’ve got to see that a riot is the language of the unheard. And, what is it that America has failed to hear? It has failed to hear that the economic plight of the Negro poor has worsened over the last few years.”




4. “When machines and computers, profit motives and property rights are considered more important than people, the giant triplets of racism, extreme materialism and militarism are incapable of being conquered.”


5. “Again we have deluded ourselves into believing the myth that Capitalism grew and prospered out of the Protestant ethic of hard work and sacrifice. The fact is that capitalism was built on the exploitation and suffering of black slaves and continues to thrive on the exploitation of the poor – both black and white, both here and abroad.”


Comrade King :banderas:






9 Radical MLK Quotes The Mainstream Media Won't Mention

6. “A nation that continues year after year to spend more money on military defense than on programs of social uplift is approaching spiritual death.”

—“Beyond Vietnam,” 1967

“Whites, it must frankly be said, are not putting in a similar mass effort to reeducate themselves out of their racial ignorance. It is an aspect of their sense of superiority that the white people of America believe they have so little to learn. The reality of substantial investment to assist Negroes into the twentieth century, adjusting to Negro neighbors and genuine school integration, is still a nightmare for all too many white Americans…These are the deepest causes for contemporary abrasions between the races. Loose and easy language about equality, resonant resolutions about brotherhood fall pleasantly on the ear, but for the Negro there is a credibility gap he cannot overlook. He remembers that with each modest advance the white population promptly raises the argument that the Negro has come far enough. Each step forward accents an ever-present tendency to backlash.”

Where Do We Go From Here, 1967

7. “The problems of racial injustice and economic injustice cannot be solved without a radical redistribution of political and economic power.”

— “The Three Evils of Society,” 1967

8. “The evils of capitalism are as real as the evils of militarism and evils of racism.”

— Southern Christian Leadership Conference speech, 1967

9. “First, I must confess that over the past few years I have been gravely disappointed with the white moderate. I have almost reached the regrettable conclusion that the Negro’s great stumbling block in his stride toward freedom is not the White Citizen’s Counciler or the Ku Klux Klanner, but the white moderate, who is more devoted to “order” than to justice; who prefers a negative peace which is the absence of tension to a positive peace which is the presence of justice; who constantly says: “I agree with you in the goal you seek, but I cannot agree with your methods of direct action”; who paternalistically believes he can set the timetable for another man’s freedom; who lives by a mythical concept of time and who constantly advises the Negro to wait for a “more convenient season.” Shallow understanding from people of good will is more frustrating than absolute misunderstanding from people of ill will. Lukewarm acceptance is much more bewildering than outright rejection.”


Letter From a Birmingham Jail, 1963
 

Originalman

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
May 15, 2014
Messages
47,127
Reputation
12,150
Daps
204,799
All THIS.

I've even seen it happen here in The Coli. The problem is that some people equate nonviolent activism with moderation or a lack of intense commitment. They don't realize that the intense form of nonviolent activism that Dr. King practiced, that Gandhi practiced, was far MORE committed and far more opposed to the system than most of his critics were.

Also frustrating as hell that they can't differentiate lack of hatred for the enemy with lack of hatred for the enemy's evil. Dr. King refused to hate people, but he absolutely despised the evil that people did and was far more committed to rooting it out and destroying it than almost anyone else was. Even today, a lot of the people who claim to hate White people or whoever else will turn around and act just like them, or buy into their systems, without a second thought.

MLK and his leadership worked better than just about any other leader's activism in American history. The reason that it's not happening right now isn't because anyone has tried and failed. It's because most wannabe activists and internet militants realize that it is too hard, takes too much commitment, and thus they don't want to try.

Be willing to give up the system of White supremacy. Be willing to take an economic hit in order to give them an economic hit. Be willing to get beat or go to jail or get killed for the struggle. Care THAT much, and then shyt will happen.







6. “A nation that continues year after year to spend more money on military defense than on programs of social uplift is approaching spiritual death.”

—“Beyond Vietnam,” 1967

“Whites, it must frankly be said, are not putting in a similar mass effort to reeducate themselves out of their racial ignorance. It is an aspect of their sense of superiority that the white people of America believe they have so little to learn. The reality of substantial investment to assist Negroes into the twentieth century, adjusting to Negro neighbors and genuine school integration, is still a nightmare for all too many white Americans…These are the deepest causes for contemporary abrasions between the races. Loose and easy language about equality, resonant resolutions about brotherhood fall pleasantly on the ear, but for the Negro there is a credibility gap he cannot overlook. He remembers that with each modest advance the white population promptly raises the argument that the Negro has come far enough. Each step forward accents an ever-present tendency to backlash.”

Where Do We Go From Here, 1967

7. “The problems of racial injustice and economic injustice cannot be solved without a radical redistribution of political and economic power.”

— “The Three Evils of Society,” 1967

8. “The evils of capitalism are as real as the evils of militarism and evils of racism.”

— Southern Christian Leadership Conference speech, 1967

9. “First, I must confess that over the past few years I have been gravely disappointed with the white moderate. I have almost reached the regrettable conclusion that the Negro’s great stumbling block in his stride toward freedom is not the White Citizen’s Counciler or the Ku Klux Klanner, but the white moderate, who is more devoted to “order” than to justice; who prefers a negative peace which is the absence of tension to a positive peace which is the presence of justice; who constantly says: “I agree with you in the goal you seek, but I cannot agree with your methods of direct action”; who paternalistically believes he can set the timetable for another man’s freedom; who lives by a mythical concept of time and who constantly advises the Negro to wait for a “more convenient season.” Shallow understanding from people of good will is more frustrating than absolute misunderstanding from people of ill will. Lukewarm acceptance is much more bewildering than outright rejection.”


Letter From a Birmingham Jail, 1963

Brotha I will say it once and I will say it again. Folks like MLK and others knew the end game was to die, be in jail for life or die broke.....period for the betterment of everyone else.

Folks now a days aint trying to do that shyt. They may get on twitter and forums and talk that shyt but they ain't trying to do none of that stuff above.

That is why I give folks the :camby:when they talking that crap about Dr. King. You can't even get jokers to boycott more than a day or more than one brand. Let alone be willing to be broke for they life and die for the betterment of others.

Jokers ain't trying to die for their neighbors let alone folks they don't even know or who haven't been born who ain't part of their family.

Edit - And when I say the betterment of others in this post I am talking about black folks. But I know I got to spell shyt out on here or jokers will make it seem like I am on some all lives matter mess.
 
Last edited:

jdashmaj

Sixers/Bulls Fan
Supporter
Joined
May 2, 2012
Messages
6,600
Reputation
3,385
Daps
15,575
Reppin
New Jersey in a new jersey
Yall need to do like me and stop watching them pregame, half time and post game shows. shyt bad for your health as a black person.

Just watch the damn game and that is it.
Yeah I stopped giving Barkley's rhetoric the time of day. All I watch is the game and switch the channel when c00n summit starts. Kenny holds it down but not enough to watch Shaq and Barkley tap dance.
 

thenatural

Superstar
Joined
Feb 11, 2014
Messages
8,981
Reputation
1,111
Daps
28,167
Plenty of idiots say shyt everyday about women.
Its him purposely arguing against a black male who was done wrong by a white woman and then attacked by the legal system that makes me angry.
Like I said in that thread, Bomani Jones is a liberal defender of white supremacy.
I think you're wrong, but you're entitled to your opinion chief
 

J-Fire

Banned
Joined
Jul 5, 2012
Messages
6,701
Reputation
-1,375
Daps
7,681
Reppin
NULL
All THIS.

I've even seen it happen here in The Coli. The problem is that some people equate nonviolent activism with moderation or a lack of intense commitment. They don't realize that the intense form of nonviolent activism that Dr. King practiced, that Gandhi practiced, was far MORE committed and far more opposed to the system than most of his critics were.

Also frustrating as hell that they can't differentiate lack of hatred for the enemy with lack of hatred for the enemy's evil. Dr. King refused to hate people, but he absolutely despised the evil that people did and was far more committed to rooting it out and destroying it than almost anyone else was. Even today, a lot of the people who claim to hate White people or whoever else will turn around and act just like them, or buy into their systems, without a second thought.

MLK and his leadership worked better than just about any other leader's activism in American history. The reason that it's not happening right now isn't because anyone has tried and failed. It's because most wannabe activists and internet militants realize that it is too hard, takes too much commitment, and thus they don't want to try.

Be willing to give up the system of White supremacy. Be willing to take an economic hit in order to give them an economic hit. Be willing to get beat or go to jail or get killed for the struggle. Care THAT much, and then shyt will happen.


You do realize the most apathetic person in a relationship is in control. The other just looks extra stupid. White apathy is/was winning....
 

J-Fire

Banned
Joined
Jul 5, 2012
Messages
6,701
Reputation
-1,375
Daps
7,681
Reppin
NULL
Brotha I will say it once and I will say it again. Folks like MLK and others knew the end game was to die, be in jail for life or die broke.....period for the betterment of everyone else.

Folks now a days aint trying to do that shyt. They may get on twitter and forums and talk that shyt but they ain't trying to do none of that stuff above.

That is why I give folks the :camby:when they talking that crap about Dr. King. You can't even get jokers to boycott more than a day or more than one brand. Let alone be willing to be broke for they life and die for the betterment of others.

Jokers ain't trying to die for their neighbors let alone folks they don't even know or who haven't been born who ain't part of their family.

Edit - And when I say the betterment of others in this post I am talking about black folks. But I know I got to spell shyt out on here or jokers will make it seem like I am on some all lives matter mess.

Black Americans have a top 10 amount of wealth world wide in the face of our current situation. We wouldn't be broke....
 

Originalman

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
May 15, 2014
Messages
47,127
Reputation
12,150
Daps
204,799
Black Americans have a top 10 amount of wealth world wide in the face of our current situation. We wouldn't be broke....

I hear you brotha. What I mean by broke is being an activist as MLK or Malcolm were. They gave up money, material things and eventually their lives to be on the front line fighting for black folks (This is something most folks aren't willing to do today). Those brothas could have made plenty of money going on college tours, speaking engagements and writing books and would have lived long lives with money in their pockets.

That is what I mean not that if black folks became separated from society that we couldn't cycle our money around.
 

hostsamurai

Demon King Of Salvation
Supporter
Joined
Nov 18, 2016
Messages
4,774
Reputation
8,965
Daps
23,198
Reppin
London
Being reactionary to the thoughts of entertainers uneducated in civil issues is not the best way to get them to shut up.
 

3:30

Thread Killer
Joined
May 30, 2012
Messages
3,487
Reputation
508
Daps
8,552
Reppin
3:30
All THIS.

I've even seen it happen here in The Coli. The problem is that some people equate nonviolent activism with moderation or a lack of intense commitment. They don't realize that the intense form of nonviolent activism that Dr. King practiced, that Gandhi practiced, was far MORE committed and far more opposed to the system than most of his critics were.

Also frustrating as hell that they can't differentiate lack of hatred for the enemy with lack of hatred for the enemy's evil. Dr. King refused to hate people, but he absolutely despised the evil that people did and was far more committed to rooting it out and destroying it than almost anyone else was. Even today, a lot of the people who claim to hate White people or whoever else will turn around and act just like them, or buy into their systems, without a second thought.

MLK and his leadership worked better than just about any other leader's activism in American history. The reason that it's not happening right now isn't because anyone has tried and failed. It's because most wannabe activists and internet militants realize that it is too hard, takes too much commitment, and thus they don't want to try.

Be willing to give up the system of White supremacy. Be willing to take an economic hit in order to give them an economic hit. Be willing to get beat or go to jail or get killed for the struggle. Care THAT much, and then shyt will happen.







6. “A nation that continues year after year to spend more money on military defense than on programs of social uplift is approaching spiritual death.”

—“Beyond Vietnam,” 1967

“Whites, it must frankly be said, are not putting in a similar mass effort to reeducate themselves out of their racial ignorance. It is an aspect of their sense of superiority that the white people of America believe they have so little to learn. The reality of substantial investment to assist Negroes into the twentieth century, adjusting to Negro neighbors and genuine school integration, is still a nightmare for all too many white Americans…These are the deepest causes for contemporary abrasions between the races. Loose and easy language about equality, resonant resolutions about brotherhood fall pleasantly on the ear, but for the Negro there is a credibility gap he cannot overlook. He remembers that with each modest advance the white population promptly raises the argument that the Negro has come far enough. Each step forward accents an ever-present tendency to backlash.”

Where Do We Go From Here, 1967

7. “The problems of racial injustice and economic injustice cannot be solved without a radical redistribution of political and economic power.”

— “The Three Evils of Society,” 1967

8. “The evils of capitalism are as real as the evils of militarism and evils of racism.”

— Southern Christian Leadership Conference speech, 1967

9. “First, I must confess that over the past few years I have been gravely disappointed with the white moderate. I have almost reached the regrettable conclusion that the Negro’s great stumbling block in his stride toward freedom is not the White Citizen’s Counciler or the Ku Klux Klanner, but the white moderate, who is more devoted to “order” than to justice; who prefers a negative peace which is the absence of tension to a positive peace which is the presence of justice; who constantly says: “I agree with you in the goal you seek, but I cannot agree with your methods of direct action”; who paternalistically believes he can set the timetable for another man’s freedom; who lives by a mythical concept of time and who constantly advises the Negro to wait for a “more convenient season.” Shallow understanding from people of good will is more frustrating than absolute misunderstanding from people of ill will. Lukewarm acceptance is much more bewildering than outright rejection.”


Letter From a Birmingham Jail, 1963
:sas2:
Please don't lump in Ghandi w MLK

Ghandi was an extreme exclusivist racist and sexual abuser
 

Professor Emeritus

Veteran
Poster of the Year
Supporter
Joined
Jan 5, 2015
Messages
51,330
Reputation
19,666
Daps
203,849
Reppin
the ether
:sas2:
Please don't lump in Ghandi w MLK

Ghandi was an extreme exclusivist racist and sexual abuser

I am talking about methodology and techniques. Dr. King (and pretty much every African nation-builder and revolutionary of the age as well) had enormous respect for Gandhi and learned a lot from him and gave him enormous props. You go to the museum at MLK's childhood home in Atlanta, a good 1/3 of the museum is strictly devoted to Gandhi. Even though they couldn't meet before Gandhi was killed, Dr. King went to India anyway to meet with Gandhi's family and spent significant time there.


And like I said, the focus is on methodology, but the "Gandhi was an extreme exclusivist racist" claim was already debated in another thread and the evidence was clear. Gandhi was certainly racist for the first half of his life, until he had a budding awakening around 1909-1912, where the combination of his personal experiences with Africans in war and a book he read on the falsehood of racism turned his mind around. For the second half of his life, the last 35-40 years, he rejected racism. Look at the dates - Gandhi died in 1948, but all of his racist quotes are always from 40+ years before that. By the time he left Africa, he had enormous respect for Black Africans, and all his quotes about Africans and Black folk after that are extremely positive.

Just look at what the Black leaders of his time, from Africa and the USA both, had to say about him. They knew him MUCH better than we do, and they are quite heavy in their praise. To claim that we know Gandhi better than them because of a couple of quotes, when they were reading his work and seeing everything he did and even corresponding with him personally, is beyond arrogant and naive.



I haven't seen any evidence that he was a sexual abuser, but his sexual practices were weird as hell. Celibacy for the last 50 years of marriage or some shyt and doing enemas on himself and sleeping naked in the same bed as young women to prove his commitment to celibacy was total.
I ain't caping for any of that shyt. :scust:
 
Top