Can we have an earnest discussion about the femcel issue we have in the Black community?

Still Benefited

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
41,301
Reputation
9,002
Daps
102,256
I shortened it up but Black women especially before the civil rights era really went through it. They had to take abuse from cacs and hide it from Black Men so they wouldn’t crash.


Black men were abusive during the civil rights movement. But they stood behind them because what we consider being abusive today was normal back then. Plus it was for the greater good. Black men of today want to be abusive without any of the good qualities those men had in the civil rights era,in terms of leadership. Is there a movement led by black men that hasnt abused black women?This is our first order of business to fix as righteous black men :respect:#TheChildOfMan
 

Still Benefited

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
41,301
Reputation
9,002
Daps
102,256
At the end of the day we have to let people do them.

One reason why the passport bro and nigcel issue is so corny is because a Man fixes his problems.

If a Man has jump through hoops for women in one place that he doesn’t have to in another place then he should take his campaign on the road in peace and silence.

If a woman is campaigning for dikk that’s crazy. Not being somewhere and falling on dikk but going to Jamaica for the sole purpose of tricking off no doubt about it that’s weird and the brainwashing to get her to overlook the old horny nigcels to pay for dikk is crazy.

Men are problemsolvers are supposed to be.


If our problem is our women,we are the problem. And wherever you go,there you are. So we essentially are preventing black men from going to other countries and creating new problems. Black men need to do self work before leaving to spread the cancer as trojan horses of white supremacy. But if they want to move as colonizers,it just speaks to my point. Obviously this doesnt apply to all black men who leave the country. But passport boys is not a movement i am behind:respect:
 

Still Benefited

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
41,301
Reputation
9,002
Daps
102,256
I'll expand a bit. Throw out the terms for a second. There is a growing number of folks who feel entitled to relationships with a certain caliber of male or female(or any relationship at all) and the lack of fulfillmemt of this entitlement is leading to new unseen levels of bitterness. I'll fold here and say social medis is making this worse by allowing echo chambers for this bitterness that offer 0 solutions.


Applying a term seems to get people bogged down into whether or not they are having sex. I'm focusing more on the psychological erosion attached to these unfulfilled entitlements. Yes a woman can get sex easier than a man but that doesn't mean she isn't developing the same negative mental state as the incel(term used to refer to certain mental viewpoints...sorry it's just convenient).



You broke this down perfectly. Ill add my two cents

These are the children of narciccist,they are the narcissist supremes.


Gen-x were narcisst,who had children with other narcissist,but felt guilty about their narcissism due to upbringing. So Gen-x built a world where there narcissist children(millenials) could live guilt free. As well as create delusional egos about ourselves not based in reality,And this would be welcomed and considered empowering. Gen-z is merely the finished product,and by that I mean Babylon is finished:respect:.



It goes way deeper than this, if spiritually you understand that as a collective that we are the mind of God. An extreme state of narcissism in the mind leads to psychosis and delusion. Men allowed to believe they are women,fat women allowed to believe they are thin,idiots allowed to think their opinions matter. Gen-z is the physical manifestation of psychosis in the mind of God. Dont be alarmed if none of it makes sense,you might be sane.



In the end who can blame us,we live in zoo created by the European. The zoo/white supremacy rewards narcisstic personality traits.
 

Ɀoᥱɣ

All Star
Joined
Mar 11, 2022
Messages
1,220
Reputation
505
Daps
4,672
Now, here is why I have an issue with this argument— you can’t bring up what happened to Black women in slavery/what may have shaped behavior without discussing the full picture. Black women were not alone in slavery. Black women were not strong enough to fight off white slave owners.


So when that white slave owner sent someone down to tell that Black women to make herself “available” to that white man, WHO WAS SUPPOSED TO STOP IT FROM HAPPENING?

When Black women had to get work as maids, etc, WHO WAS SUPPOSED TO MAKE SURE WE DIDN’T HAVE TO WORK FOR THE WHITE FAMILIES? Or be our protection and be in the area/neighborhood if we had to go to work in those homes to help provide for our families?

If Black women “got used to being used by cacs”, as you say, it’s because no one stopped it and made sure that wasn’t the Black woman’s experience.

You do realize that 16, 18, 20, 22, 30+ yo black teens/women doing domestic work in these white homes…they didn’t want to be there. :what:

I mean if “divesting” started in slavery then so did “pawging” because same way we have Black women who clearly have issues with brehs and they don’t know how to act, we ALSO have Black men who think brehettes are beneath white women, Asian women and Latinas and will let the whole world know.

____________________________


I say all that to say, YES there are weird ass Black women who probably don’t look that great and have shytty personalities who have issues with Black men, and you’re fine to call them out.


But we don’t need to reach back in history and blame it on the experience of women who were ENSLAVED and unprotected from white men.


It can just simply be that these are women who weren’t socialized properly and are lame as fukk. 🤷🏾‍♀️




Same way you can put a man in the gym, put him in a new career and give him some interesting hobbies and all of a sudden :gladbron: he getting women cuz he looks better, has money and has shyt to talk about, is the same way you can improve some key shyt with these women and make them the kind of women men actually want to be around.




Yes them chicks in the OP are weird for singling out a little 2YO Black boy. Yes. Weird as hell. Lame as hell. They are bitter for whatever reason and can be called out. Slavery doesn’t need to be cited.
 

Ozymandeas

Veteran
Joined
Jan 28, 2013
Messages
16,099
Reputation
2,689
Daps
75,755
Reppin
NULL
Man, this has a dangerous tone sis.

Now, here is why I have an issue with this argument— you can’t bring up what happened to Black women in slavery/what may have shaped behavior without discussing the full picture. Black women were not alone in slavery. Black women were not strong enough to fight off white slave owners.


So when that white slave owner sent someone down to tell that Black women to make herself “available” to that white man, WHO WAS SUPPOSED TO STOP IT FROM HAPPENING?

When Black women had to get work as maids, etc, WHO WAS SUPPOSED TO MAKE SURE WE DIDN’T HAVE TO WORK FOR THE WHITE FAMILIES? Or be our protection and be in the area/neighborhood if we had to go to work in those homes to help provide for our families?

If Black women “got used to being used by cacs”, as you say, it’s because no one stopped it and made sure that wasn’t the Black woman’s experience.

You do realize that 16, 18, 20, 22, 30+ yo black teens/women doing domestic work in these white homes…they didn’t want to be there. :what:

I mean if “divesting” started in slavery then so did “pawging” because same way we have Black women who clearly have issues with brehs and they don’t know how to act, we ALSO have Black men who think brehettes are beneath white women, Asian women and Latinas and will let the whole world know.

____________________________


I say all that to say, YES there are weird ass Black women who probably don’t look that great and have shytty personalities who have issues with Black men, and you’re fine to call them out.


But we don’t need to reach back in history and blame it on the experience of women who were ENSLAVED and unprotected from white men.


It can just simply be that these are women who weren’t socialized properly and are lame as fukk. 🤷🏾‍♀️




Same way you can put a man in the gym, put him in a new career and give him some interesting hobbies and all of a sudden :gladbron: he getting women cuz he looks better, has money and has shyt to talk about, is the same way you can improve some key shyt with these women and make them the kind of women men actually want to be around.




Yes them chicks in the OP are weird for singling out a little 2YO Black boy. Yes. Weird as hell. Lame as hell. They are bitter for whatever reason and can be called out. Slavery doesn’t need to be cited.

I understand where you're coming from but, I have to be honest, I don't know how I feel about the not being protected part. Jewish women don't go in on Jewish men for not protecting them from the Holocaust. Native American women don't go in on their men for losing an entire continent and having mass genocide committed against them.

Our ancestors were the victims of war, kidnapping, etc. We took an L. I just don't think it's constructive to imply that our forefathers were weak for letting it happen when we should be focusing on how to put ourselves in a better position going forward. It's not just Black men who dropped the ball. Whites killed off the Natives and took their land, killed off the Aboriginals, took over India, took over China, and to a lesser extent, a group of whites tried to exterminate the Jews. It wasn't just Black men that got fukked over, we just got fukked over the worst.
 

Barlow

He,Him,Nigguh
Joined
Aug 7, 2015
Messages
6,967
Reputation
3,017
Daps
49,855
So one therapist out of the thousands is the flag that all of them are like that? Is that what you're saying? You sound like a goofy spook lol. Again I have yet to encounter a chic like that in real life or one that's bold to voice those views in my face. So why would I be sitting around foaming at the mouth like you clowns because of a post that y'all sought out to give y'all confirmation bias about your silly P.O.V. if you truly were so concerned about race issues like that the first thing you wouldn't be doing is even using Twitter because of its owner and their viewpoint and yet you still are. But you need Twitter for that dopamine hit lol.
I've never encountered a doctor that says "hey I hate black women and will give them a c section for no reason and believe they don't feel as much pain."

I guess their issues in hospitals don't exist.
 

Jaguar93

Veteran
Joined
Jan 28, 2016
Messages
15,925
Reputation
4,365
Daps
77,643


Here are some of the terms that they use for black men: nakers, bullet bags, felony fairy, conquered male, apes, nig nogs, nigcels, gorillas, dindu nuffins, and tyrones. The women that defend black men are called ‘mamm’es’, ‘pick me’s’, and ‘guard dogs’. They use terms and phrases like “blackistan” to refer to black areas, “struggle love” to describe dating a black man, and “burn the cape” to advocate against defending black men. One of their favorite phrases is the use of “holding black men accountable” when referencing any violence that black women experience at the hands of black men, often going as far to advocate for more black men to die at the hands of the police. They use hashtags like #notyourmule #divest #burnthecape #divestordie

The biggest problem with Divestors is that they market racist ideas about black men as black women’s empowerment. You will have writers, bloggers, youtubers and influencers who are Divestors, as well as people parroting divestor talking points for engagement. Individuals who are divestor adjacent will stop just short of saying things explicitly racist and will delete their comments if they get caught openly expressing their disdain for black men.
 

Gloxina

Veteran
Joined
Mar 11, 2022
Messages
23,165
Reputation
8,767
Daps
84,107
I understand where you're coming from but, I have to be honest, I don't know how I feel about the not being protected part. Jewish women don't go in on Jewish men for not protecting them from the Holocaust. Native American women don't go in on their men for losing an entire continent and having mass genocide committed against them.

Our ancestors were the victims of war, kidnapping, etc. We took an L. I just don't think it's constructive to imply that our forefathers were weak for letting it happen when we should be focusing on how to put ourselves in a better position going forward. It's not just Black men who dropped the ball. Whites killed off the Natives and took their land, killed off the Aboriginals, took over India, took over China, and to a lesser extent, a group of whites tried to exterminate the Jews. It wasn't just Black men that got fukked over, we just got fukked over the worst.
Here’s the thing— I’m not implying that our forefathers just stood by and “didn’t care” or “let it happen”. Obviously they all would’ve been murdered and we wouldn’t be here. Full stop.


I go hard when the topic of slavery comes up because, very conveniently, a lot of men want to reference what Black women “did with the slave masters” as if it was possibly consensual. And they want to attribute current day Black women’s potentially negative or damaging behavior, attitudes, desires, etc to “interactions” with white men slavery— I.e. being forced into situations against their will by the most powerful people (white men).

Saying Black women might be divestors and have attitudes with Black men because they are used to being used by cacs and have Stockholm syndrome, so that makes them (divestors) want to deal with white men is a WILD TAKE.

To your point- does anyone say there are Japanese-American women who are into white guys because of Stockholm syndrome dating back to when the Japanese were forced into American internment camps during WWII? Nah. No one would think that of Japanese American women, no one would think that of Jewish women, no one would think that of Native women…so why think that is a possibility for BLACK AMERICAN women? How is that even a thought?

Referencing women who were beaten, raped by their literal OWNERS, forced to breed non-stop, have their children stripped away, forced to breastfeed and rear the next generation of their owners, marry and then have their husbands and children sold to other plantations to never be seen again, never have a day of peace until their literal death…

Fast forward- then the descendants of those enslaved women had to serve these ppl in their homes after slavery was over— where the same dynamics were at play: you were spoken to like an animal while serving white women, still rearing their children, possibly being groped or raped by the white man who was the one paying you, his wife knowing/suspecting it and treating you even worse because of it (akin to the type of shyt happening right now to many of the African women who traveled to the Middle East for domestic work— stuck in slavery getting raped by the husbands and beaten by the wives)………


There are men who say Black women enjoyed dealing with “massa”. There are men who reference those times as “what happened with the white man”, etc, as if Black women in those times possibly had any other choice. There are men who don’t detail what that lived experience was like for enslaved women.


Like I said— people desire whites because they are the “dominant” culture and they literally subjugated the globe and made themselves the image of all that is right. That’s why Asian chicks go crazy for white dudes here, but Asian women in their home countries…it ain’t as drastic. Because they aren’t surrounded by the messaging of White Supremacy.


Those simple ass broads on social media talking about that little boy/liking the tweet- those women are trash.
But we don’t have to bring up slavery and say that Black women are accustomed to being abused by white men so that’s why divestors exist and talk about Black men.
That is beyond extreme.

Are we able to call out negative behavior of some current day Black men and say “Oh, they’re like that because of slavery”? Black men who like PAWGs (:mjlol::bryan:) and disparage Black women, that’s because of slavery. Y’all know plantation owners’ wives had male slaves they were attracted to and the same way female slaves couldn’t turn down their owners, male slaves couldn’t turn down the white women either.

Would that NOT sound crazy to you? To blame it on that? To even reference that?


That was my point.

It has nothing to do with slavery. Some ppl are lame and they display it on social media. Black folks have a lot of pain that we need to sort through, but sometimes, sometimes the issue is a socialization problem. We can call them out without bringing up women who were living in time when it was survival or death.
 

Gloxina

Veteran
Joined
Mar 11, 2022
Messages
23,165
Reputation
8,767
Daps
84,107
Man, this has a dangerous tone sis.
I know the exact tone you are referring to (which is NOT how I feel about our men, now or in that time period, but I went there to make my point), but that’s the tone I thought the breh was leaning into, which is why I said what I said.

I think my post above ⬆️ ⬆️ gives further detail/explanation tho.
 
Top