Can HL Still Be a "Liberal Circle Jerk" Despite the Biggest Liberal/Dem Shill Winning WOAT?

[Serious]

Low-key @The Black Panther got @4d 6f 6e 65 79 jammed up in this thread for no reason at all.

That bipartisanship

 

[Pressure]

“Trolling” has become an easy(and the proffered) way for HL liberals to dismiss conservative arguments.

It was my time as Mod that showed me this and just how bias the forum is...and it’s not something that can be modded away.

How Libertarian of you.

 

[Serious]

Which conservative posters on here do you respect and/or think aren’t trolls?

@ogc163

 

[Wargames]

The only real issue with HL is that it's obsessed with the soap opera of partisan politics.

These are Partisan times breh. Like the1960's but it's still under the surface.

 

[the cac mamba]

I got bushed for talking bad about the dept of education

 

[Alpha Male]

For the record I used to lean left. The first time I voted was Kerry, then I voted Obama both times. I thought republicans were evil, I thought democrats were for the people...all that stuff.

Then I grew up.

 

[Worthless Loser]

I don't mind black conservatives if they aren't c00ns but I have zero tolerance for any Trump supporter.

 

[Black Panther]

I got bushed for talking bad about the dept of education

It was a little more than that. :bpumad:

 

[Alpha Male]

It was a little more than that. :bpumad:

You must be the one that reported me then

 

[Shogun]

These are Partisan times breh. Like the1960's but it's still under the surface.

Hard to compare a bunch of people posting anonymously on the internet to the sit-ins, freedom riders, black panthers, vietnam war protesters, etc.
These are self aggrandizing times.

 

[Black Panther]

You must be the one that reported me then

Nope, but I should have.

You were advocating for eliminating the Department of Education and fracturing the US educational system in the name of increasing collective educational results for the nation, which is an utterly insane argument.

And yes, you should have been bushed for that.

 

[Alpha Male]

Nope, but I should have.

You were advocating for eliminating the Department of Education and fracturing the US educational system in the name of increasing collective educational results for the nation, which is an utterly insane argument.

And yes, you should have been bushed for that.

Good to know where you stand.

Case in point.

Higher Learning

 

[Tom Foolery]

The problem here is not left or right.

There's a group of bytch ass posters hiding behind agendas here.

When we are ready to have a real discussion let me know.

 

[Black Panther]

Good to know where you stand.

Case in point.

Higher Learning

You are the most obtuse poster on this sub. I have yet to see one of your posts that didn't seem disingenuous in some way.

You ask so many questions, and then complain about the answers. The questions you ask aren't for the purpose of seeking information; they're whiny whataboutisms.

Also, you have yet to answer my question on that.

Schools that have adequate (or more than adequate) funding for their students stand to benefit more from privatized education, whereas underfunded schools would suffer. This is entirely due to the inherent inequality that already exists under our current system.

What mechanism would we have to ensure that underfunded schools get the help they need?

 

[88m3]

higher learning as a liberal circle jerk has been greatly exaggerated