But seriously, did O.J. do it?
- Thread starter levitate
- Start date
Concerned Citizen
HxH, LoSH 5YG, WW, DS9, IYKYK
Not only did he NOT DO IT he has been on the hunt for the real killer for decades 
OJ is all about turning the fictional story of "Othello" into true-crime entertainment money
Let's get this straight. ...
For OJ to be guilty all of of these would have to be true:
A) OJ had a motive to kill the mother of his children
B) OJ had a motive to kill his ex-wife with a knife
C) OJ planned to do this in a small window of time before a plane trip across country
D) in the process of his aim to kill his children's mother, OJ unexpectedly comes across a fit young man
E) OJ manages to keep his composure and manages to kill the young man and Nicole the same way
F) There's a lot of fight back, but somehow OJ doesn't get marked up
G) Then OJ manages to immediately get on the plane and remain composed
Evidence was clearly tainted at the criminal trial.
The so-called Bruno Magli shoes proof used in the civil trial was based on speculation not technological fact.
The reason OJ was accused is clear if you look at White culture.
White men historically believed they owned their women. (see the reason for White feminism)
And the White husband is typically to be blamed when the wife gets murdered.
Just do a search of "Man murders wife" or "Man murders ex-wife" or "Domestic homicide"
Or start with "Murder-suicide" and find white celebrities like Chris Benoit and more.
There was a window to look at other killers but LAPD rejected all of it.
As soon as the news media got a hold of this big story, everybody knew this would butter their bread for years.
Why was it immediately called "Trial of the Century?"
It wasn't because Nicole Simpson was famous or accomplished.
Nicole Simpson stopped being a regular person with faults but a pure princess (eg. Desdemona in the Othello play).
If LAPD focused on anybody but OJ for Nicole's murder, it would have been quickly forgotten and there is no trial of the century.
It was 'Trial of the Century' because they could easily make OJ into 'Othello' and stand in for all Black men.
Nicole could easily stand in for all pure White womanhood.
Therefore this $tory demand$ the attention of everybody.
Just Follow the money.
Let's get this straight. ...
For OJ to be guilty all of of these would have to be true:
A) OJ had a motive to kill the mother of his children
B) OJ had a motive to kill his ex-wife with a knife
C) OJ planned to do this in a small window of time before a plane trip across country
D) in the process of his aim to kill his children's mother, OJ unexpectedly comes across a fit young man
E) OJ manages to keep his composure and manages to kill the young man and Nicole the same way
F) There's a lot of fight back, but somehow OJ doesn't get marked up
G) Then OJ manages to immediately get on the plane and remain composed
Evidence was clearly tainted at the criminal trial.
The so-called Bruno Magli shoes proof used in the civil trial was based on speculation not technological fact.
The reason OJ was accused is clear if you look at White culture.
White men historically believed they owned their women. (see the reason for White feminism)
And the White husband is typically to be blamed when the wife gets murdered.
Just do a search of "Man murders wife" or "Man murders ex-wife" or "Domestic homicide"
Or start with "Murder-suicide" and find white celebrities like Chris Benoit and more.
There was a window to look at other killers but LAPD rejected all of it.
As soon as the news media got a hold of this big story, everybody knew this would butter their bread for years.
Why was it immediately called "Trial of the Century?"
It wasn't because Nicole Simpson was famous or accomplished.
Nicole Simpson stopped being a regular person with faults but a pure princess (eg. Desdemona in the Othello play).
If LAPD focused on anybody but OJ for Nicole's murder, it would have been quickly forgotten and there is no trial of the century.
It was 'Trial of the Century' because they could easily make OJ into 'Othello' and stand in for all Black men.
Nicole could easily stand in for all pure White womanhood.
Therefore this $tory demand$ the attention of everybody.
Just Follow the money.
XannyWarbucks
Superstar
He was certainly there, but I do feel like his son did it. OJ wasn't in shape for any of that and the first person he spoke to after the chase was his kid.
In the end, this was more about the LAPD bungling the case and cacs finally getting their just deserts.
In the end, this was more about the LAPD bungling the case and cacs finally getting their just deserts.
he hated her in the beging...then he became obsessed with her..she put a restraining order on him...he had an event at his restuarant nobody showed up...he was mentally unstable..he was off his meds..
in both of his aggravated assault cases vs his girlfriend n former manger...he tried to kill both of them with a knife..
he was trained...
he was there after he got a called....
Lots of men get violently angry at a woman being intimate with another man, even when the aggrieved doesn’t even want the woman
Flywin Lannister
Superstar
Come on man
“I grabbed the knife..”
“Hypothetically!”
What sane and innocent person would role play this AFTER a not guilty verdict?
He even says someone else was there, his friend “Charlie”
Come on, how can adults watch this video and still say no
My brother. I love my people too, but plenty brothers in the chi and ATL are killers. Murder is not limited to non-Black people. OF COURSE he did it or orchestrated it, which might as well be the same thing as it caused their deaths.
Or how about the fact Ron Goldman had fought with attacker for at least 5min ..had bruised knuckles yet OJ had no marking on him that would indicate a fight for his or anyone else’s life..also if he did it where did all the blood go?That crime scene as pure carnage yet OJ managed to not track any blood in his carpeted home.. the cops went as far as examining the pipes in his shower and found no blood? Why were the socks in his room planted?
Corny Batman
Caped Crusader
The LAPD attempted to frame OJ Simpson for a murder he committed.
Come on man
“I grabbed the knife..”
“Hypothetically!”
What sane and innocent person would role play this AFTER a not guilty verdict?
He even says someone else was there, his friend “Charlie”
Come on, how can adults watch this video and still say no
My brother. I love my people too, but plenty brothers in the chi and ATL are killers. Murder is not limited to non-Black people. OF COURSE he did it or orchestrated it, which might as well be the same thing as it caused their deaths.
How did he do it and got away with it?
Luxury Tax
Middleman Money
wouldn't Furhman be more of a suspect than Jason?
So OJ was at the scene of the crime and dipped to Chicago....Leaving his 5 and 8 year old kids in the house?
Instead of calling the police or a family member to get his children, OJ was like "fukk it, let me chip some golf balls before this limo gets here".
Besides, what guilty man willingly talks to homicide detectives without his lawyer.... During that interview with the detectives OJ thought Nicole was shot to death.
malbaker86
Gators
just asking but where did they get his blood from?
edit: i shoulda just googled this which i just did and found the answer
Some say his son did it and he took the fall to cover for him.
OJ ain’t taking the fall for no nikkas.
Half breed or otherwise
Nah but for real once I was old enough to read up on the shyt I don’t think he killed her or even wanted her dead. I DO think he knows who actually did it and its bigger than just him so he’s just kept it moving