Business idea: Uber for on demand personal security

[Instant Classic]

It won't work because there's no way you want to put that much trust in a stranger to do this. We already have issues with Uber drivers sexually assaulting women, so I don't think you want to take that big of a risk. Also, the payment structure would have to be lucrative enough for workers to use this app instead of getting a job from an agency.

It might sound decent on paper, but the risk and logistics of it all doesn't seem feasible imo

 

[Jean Jacket]

Ex Marine friend of mine used to be private security for celebrities.

There's already an industry.

The vetting process is most important.

How are you going to leverage flexibility of crowd source/gig contracting against scaling needs for valid, accurate (expensive and lengthy) background investigations?

Seems like you just want to start a security company. Do that first and tailor your marketing to reach those ad hoc clients.

 

[King Poetic]

 

[Suge Shot Me]

It won't work because there's no way you want to put that much trust in a stranger to do this. We already have issues with Uber drivers sexually assaulting women, so I don't think you want to take that big of a risk. Also, the payment structure would have to be lucrative enough for workers to use this app instead of getting a job from an agency.

It might sound decent on paper, but the risk and logistics of it all doesn't seem feasible imo

​

Your objections are valid and highlight some of the critical challenges this startup idea would face.

1. Trust and Vetting: One way to address the issue of trust is by implementing a rigorous vetting process for the bodyguards, such as thorough background checks and necessary training certifications. Additionally, the service could employ bodyguards who are off-duty police officers or military personnel to enhance trust.
2. Legal Liabilities: Comprehensive insurance and legal frameworks would need to be in place to protect both customers and workers. Real-time tracking and emergency features could be added to the app for an extra layer of safety.
3. Financial Incentives: To make the platform attractive for bodyguards, the app could offer competitive pay, flexible hours, or bonuses for high customer satisfaction ratings.
4. Alternatives to Agencies: The on-demand nature could appeal to bodyguards who are looking for supplementary income or more flexible hours than what agencies might offer.

While these solutions don't entirely eliminate the risks, they could mitigate them to a level where the service might become viable.
\
ChatGPT

 

[Umoja]

Any security guard worth his salt is not heading out to protect an unknown in a situation he has zero knowledge of.

The premiums will prevent this from being a legal venture. Anyone looking to implement this shyt would be on some bandulu business.

The people in danger would essentially be running to unvetted people for assistance, assuming it isn't used as a front for hiring mercenaries.

 

[Suge Shot Me]

Ex Marine friend of mine used to be private security for celebrities.

There's already an industry.

The vetting process is most important.

How are you going to leverage flexibility of crowd source/gig contracting against scaling needs for valid, accurate (expensive and lengthy) background investigations?

Seems like you just want to start a security company. Do that first and tailor your marketing to reach those ad hoc clients.

I'm thinking a basic criminal background check, verification of security licensing, personality test, and brief interview should suffice. I don't think it would be very expensive.

 

[Instant Classic]

​

Your objections are valid and highlight some of the critical challenges this startup idea would face.

1. Trust and Vetting: One way to address the issue of trust is by implementing a rigorous vetting process for the bodyguards, such as thorough background checks and necessary training certifications. Additionally, the service could employ bodyguards who are off-duty police officers or military personnel to enhance trust.
2. Legal Liabilities: Comprehensive insurance and legal frameworks would need to be in place to protect both customers and workers. Real-time tracking and emergency features could be added to the app for an extra layer of safety.
3. Financial Incentives: To make the platform attractive for bodyguards, the app could offer competitive pay, flexible hours, or bonuses for high customer satisfaction ratings.
4. Alternatives to Agencies: The on-demand nature could appeal to bodyguards who are looking for supplementary income or more flexible hours than what agencies might offer.

While these solutions don't entirely eliminate the risks, they could mitigate them to a level where the service might become viable.
\
ChatGPT

Essentially, do you want this app to replace security agencies?

I think the major issue is with all of this vetting wouldn't somebody just opt for an agency that would give you guaranteed work?

I feel what makes services like Uber work is the quantity of workers you can attract. The pool of eligible workers for Uber like services is endless and it's easy for somebody to be eligible to work. Sure, you'll get your share of trash workers, but with the large pool of talent, there is a lot of risk on workers side to not screw up. I feel with this app there will be a supply issue because the vetting process will make people opt for reputable firms, and too much risk in not vetting workers to get a large supply of eligible workers.

 

[ReturnOfJudah]

worst idea ever

 

[Suge Shot Me]

Essentially, do you want this app to replace security agencies?

Not at all. The target market for this service is individuals who encounter unforeseen security risks and require immediate assistance. AFAIK this is not a niche served by traditional security agencies.

 

[skylove4]

Imagine one of your female loved ones is out alone and feels threatened by someone. She can use this app to request a 1099 bodyguard to escort her to safety for a reasonable fee.

 

[Vandelay]

This sound like a massive liability/involuntary manslaughter case waiting to happen.

You better have a gang of lawyers on deck. Personal security on-demand is not a good idea, being completely honest. There's so much nuance involved.

 

[Amerikan Melanin]

bytches gonna use this so they can pop shyt and hide behind Brutus.

Good idea especially if the escort came with a female liason.

 

[Savvir]

bytches gonna use this so they can pop shyt and hide behind Brutus.

Brick girl would have went crazy with this shyt.

 

[Waka FICO Flamez]

Liability too much. Also it sets up wolves to feast. Imagine getting an alert that some dude needs security cause he got money on him. Uber driver could contact one of his boys to rob him after drop off.

 

[Double Burger With Cheese]

People who got a need for security typically gonna use somebody recommended from someone else, usually one of they partners.